AdornoTheodor W. (1976) The Postivist Dispute in German Sociology. New York.
2.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1975) Against Method. New York.
3.
GewirthAlan (1974) ‘The “Is-Ought” Problem Resolved’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association47, 34–61.
4.
GoodmanNelson (1972) Problems and Projects. Indianapolis.
5.
HabermasJürgen (1971) Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston.
6.
HintikkaJaakko (1973) Logic, Language-Games and Information. London.
7.
KuhnThomas (1970a) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago.
8.
KuhnThomas (1970b) ‘Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?', and ‘Reflections on My Critics’, in LakatosImreMusgraveAlan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London, pp. 1–12, 231–78.
9.
LinskyLeonard (ed.) (1971) Reference and Modality. London.
10.
LorenzKuno (1968) ‘Dialogspiele als semantische Grundlage von Logikkalkülen’, Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung11, 32–55 and 73–100.
LuceR. DuncanRaiffaHoward (1957) Games and Decisions. New York.
13.
MartinR. M. (1943) ‘A Homogeneous System for Formal Logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic8, 1–23.
14.
PopperKarl R. (1961) The Poverty of Historicism. New York.
15.
PopperKarl R. (1968) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York.
16.
PopperKarl R. (1972) Objective Knowledge. London.
17.
QuineW. V. (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge.
18.
QuineW. V. (1969) Ontological Relativity. New York.
19.
QuineW. V. (1970) Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
20.
QuineW. V. (1974) The Roots of Reference. La Salle, Il.
21.
QuineW. V. (1975a) ‘On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World’, Erkenntnis, 9, 313–28.
22.
QuineW. V. (1975b) ‘Replies’, in DavidsonD.HintikkaJ. (eds.), Words and Objections. Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 292–352.
23.
ReichenbachHans (1938) Experience and Prediction. Chicago.
24.
RileyGresham (ed.) (1974) Values, Objectivity and the Social Sciences. Reading, Mass.
25.
SchefflerIsrael (1967) Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis.
26.
SearleJohn R. (1969) Speech Acts. London.
27.
ShapereDudley (1964) ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, Philosophical Review73, 383–94.
28.
StegmüllerWolfgang (1964) ‘Remarks on the Completeness of Logical Systems Relative to the Validity-Concepts of P. Lorenzen and K. Lorenz’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic5, 81–112.