Review Symposium : Douglas W. Hands G. C. Archibald Joseph Agassi On S. J. Latsis,ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1976. Pp. viii + 218. $17.50 The Methodology of Economic Research Programmes

Agassi, J. and Klappholz, K. (1959) 'Methodological Prescriptions in Economics', Economica, 26 , 60-74.

— (1960) 'A Rejoinder', Economica , 27, 160-61.

Blaug, M. (1976a) 'Kuhn Versus Lakatos or Paradigms Versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics', in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge, pp. 149-80.

— (1976b) 'The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey', Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 827-55.

Coats, A.W. (1976) 'Economics and Psychology: The Death and Resurrection of a Research Programme', in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge, pp. 43-64.

DeMarchi (1976) 'Anomaly and the Development of Economics: The Case of the Leontief Paradox' , in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics , Cambridge, pp. 109-27.

Feyerabend, P.K. (1974) 'Popper's Objective Knowledge', Inquiry, 17, 475-507.

— (1975a) Against Method, London.

— (1975b) 'Imre Lakatos', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26, 1-18.

Friedman, M. (1953) 'The Methodology of Positive Economics', in M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, pp. 3-43.

Harré, R. (1972) The Philosophies of Science, London.

Hicks, J.R. (1976) 'Revolutions in Economics.' in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge, pp.207-18.

Hutchison, T.W. (1960) 'Methodological Prescriptions in Economics: A Reply' , Economica , 27, 158-60.

— (1976) 'On the History and Philosophy of Science and Economics' , in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics , Cambridge, pp. 181-205.

Kuhn, T.S. (1970a) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 2nd ed., Chicago .

— (1970B) 'Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?' , in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, pp. 1-12.

— (1970c) 'Reflections on my Critics', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, pp. 231-78.

— (1971) 'Notes on Lakatos', Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8 , 137-46.

Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1970a) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambrdige.

Lakatos, I. (1970b) 'Falsfication and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, pp. 91-196.

— (1971a) 'History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions' , Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science , 8, 91-136.

— (1971b) 'Replies to Critics', Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, 174-82.

Latsis, S.J. (1976a) Method and Appraisal in Economics , Cambridge.

— (1976b) 'A Research Programme in Economics', in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics , Cambridge, pp. 1-41.

Laudan (1965) 'Grunbaum on "The Duhemian Argument"', Philosophy of Science , 32, 295-99.

Leijonhufvud, A. (1976) 'Schools, "Revolutions" and Research Programmes in Economic Theory', in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge, pp. 65-108.

Lipsey, R.G. (1966) An Introduction to Positive Economics , 2nd ed.

— and Steiner, P.O. (1975) Economics 4th ed., New York.

O'Brian, D.P. (1976) 'The Longevity of Adam Smith's Vision: Paradigms, Research Programmes and Falsifiability in the History of Economic Thought' , Scottish Journal of Political Economy , 23, 133-51.

Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations, New York.

— ( 1970) 'Normal Science and its Dangers', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , Cambridge, pp. 51-58.

— ( 1972) 'The Bucket and the Searchlight: Two Theories of Knowledge' , in K. Popper, Objective Knowledge, Oxford, pp. 341-61.

Salmon, W.C. (1966) The Foundations of Scientific Inference , Pittsburgh.

Simon, H.A. (1976) 'From Substantive to Procedural Rationality', in S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics , Cambridge, pp. 129-48.