Popper’s philosophy of science and economic imperialism are “correctly” formulated. Popper’s philosophy contrasts with the author’s interpretation. The reliance on situational analysis is dubious; one needs to break with it. Three tasks are bringing Popper’s theory in conformity with scientific research and practices of social scientists and explaining how Popper could have endorsed a theory of how institutions function. The description of problems Popper’s view raises is too narrow, as is situational analysis. Merten had sympathy for Popper’s philosophy. Popper’s theory is incorrectly described, due to the absence of philosophical considerations.
CaldwellBruce J.1991. “Clarifying Popper.” Journal of Economic Literature29 (1): 1–33.
2.
CaldwellBruce J.1998. “Situational Analysis.” In Handbook of Economic Methodology, edited by DavisJohn B.HandsD. W.MäkiUskali, 462–68. Edward Elgar.
3.
CaldwellBruce J.2001. “HES Presidential Address Hayek: Right for the Wrong Reasons?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought23 (2): 141–51.
4.
CaldwellBruce J.2006. “Popper and Hayek: Who Influenced Whom?” In Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, edited by JarvieIanMilfordKarlMillerDavid, 1: 111–24. Ashgate.
5.
ColemanJames S.1986. “Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action.” American Journal of Sociology91 (6): 1309–35.
6.
ColemanJames S.1987. “Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behavior.” In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by AlexanderJeffrey C.GiesenBernhardMunchRichardSmelserNeil J., 153–73. University of California Press.
7.
HacohenMalachi Haim. 2000. Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902-1945. Cambridge University Press.
8.
HedströmPeter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press.
9.
HedströmPeterBearmanPeter. 2009. “What Is Analytical Sociology all About? an Introductory Essay.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 3–24. Oxford University Press.
10.
HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: an Introductory Essay.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard, 1–31. Cambridge University Press.
11.
HedströmPeterUdehnLars. 2009. “Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle Range.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 25–48. Oxford University Press.
12.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology36: 49–67.
13.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2011. “Analytical Sociology.” In The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by JarvieIan C.Zamora-BonillaJesús, 386–98. Sage.
14.
HedströmPeterSwedbergRichardUdehnLars. 1998. “Popper’s Situational Analysis and Contemporary Sociology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences28 (3): 339–64. doi:10.1177/004839319802800302
15.
JarvieIan C.1998. “Situational Logic and Its Reception.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences28 (3): 365–80.
16.
MengerCarl.1883 (1985). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. Edited by Louis Schneider and translated by Francis J. Nock. New York University Press.
17.
MengerCarl.1871 (2007). Principles of Economics. Translated by James Dingwall andBertF. Hoselitz. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
18.
MertonRobert K.1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review1 (6): 894–904.
19.
MertonRobert K.1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Antioch Review8 (2): 193–210.
20.
MisesLudwig von. 1949 (1963). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 2nd ed.Yale University Press.
21.
Palacio-VeraAlfonso. 2025. Popper and Situational Analysis: Theory and Method for Contemporary Economics and Sociology. Routledge.
22.
SwedbergRichardMatznerEgon. 1998. “Introduction to the Special Issues on Situational Analysis.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences28 (3): 333–38.
23.
WetterstenJ.1980. “Procrustean Beds of Scientific Style.” Dialogos36: 97–116. Reprinted in John Wettersten. Fallibilist Solutions to Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 318–338, 2022.
24.
WetterstenJohn.1982. “The Philosophy of Science and the History of Science: Separate Aspects Versus Separate Domains.” Philosophical Forum14 (1): 59–79. Reprinted in John Wettersten. A Fallibilist Social Methodology for Today's Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 108–129, 2022.
25.
WetterstenJohn. 1992. The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Rodopi.
26.
WetterstenJohn.2005. “New Insights on Young Popper.” Journal of the History of Ideas66 (4): 603–31. Reprinted in John Wettersten. The Deepening and Widening of Understanding through Continued Criticism by Critical Rationalists of Critical Rationalist Theories. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, forthcoming.
27.
WetterstenJohn. 2006. How Do Institutions Steer Events? an Inquiry into the Limits and Possibilities of Rational Thought and Action. Ashgate.
28.
WetterstenJohn.2011. “Partial Fallibilist Social Rationality and the Social Sciences Today.” In Karl Popper Oggi: Una riflessione multidisciplinare, edited by BorghiniAndreaGatteiStefano, 21–60. Salomone Belforte. Reprinted in John Wettersten. The Deepening and Widening of Understanding through Continued Criticism by Critical Rationalists of Critical Rationalist Theories. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, forthcoming.
29.
WetterstenJohn.2012. “Beyond Methodological Individualism: Social Scientific Studies of Rational Practice.” European Journal of Sociology53 (1): 97–118; Reprinted in John Wettersten. A Fallibilist Social Methodology for Today’s Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 365–388, 2022.
30.
WetterstenJohn.2013. “Die Inkompatibilität von Poppers Theorie der Rationalität mit dem methodologischen Individualismus.” In Kritischer Rationalismus heute: Zur Aktualität der Philosophie Karl Poppers, edited by NeckReinhardStelzerHarald, 79–108. Peter Lang. English translation printed in John Wettersten, A Fallibilist Social Methodology for Today’s Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 335–364, 2022.
31.
WetterstenJohn.2014. “New Social Tasks for Cognitive Psychology; Or, New Cognitive Tasks for Social Psychology.” American Journal of Psychology127 (4): 403–18; Reprinted in John Wettersten. Fallibilist Solutions to Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 152–173, 2022.
32.
WetterstenJohn.2019a. “Bühler und Gomperz: Zwei zentrale Hintergründe von Poppers früher Forschung.” In Handbuch Karl Popper, edited by FrancoGiuseppe, 177–88. Springer. Reprinted in John Wettersten. The Deepening and Widening of Understanding through Continued Criticism by Critical Rationalists of Critical Rationalist Theories. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, forthcoming.
33.
WetterstenJohn.2019b. “How to Integrate Economic, Social and Political Theory: Revise the Rationality Principle.” In The Impact of Critical Rationalism: Expanding the Popperian Legacy through the Works of Ian C. Jarvie, edited by SassowerRaphaelLaorNathaniel, 81–94. Palgrave Macmillan. Reprinted in John Wettersten. Fallibilist Solutions to Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 416–430, 2022.
34.
WetterstenJohn.2019c. “Wie viel hat Karl Popper von Carl Menger gelernt?” In Handbuch Karl Popper, edited by FrancoGiuseppe, 239–50. Springer. English translation printed in John Wettersten. Fallibilist Solutions to Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 201–214, 2022.
35.
WetterstenJohn.2019d. “The Würzburg School Today: the Three—Now Four—World Theory and New Psychological Research.” Theory & Psychology 29 (3): 396–416. Reprinted in John Wettersten. Fallibilist Solutions to Institutional Problems. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 174–200, 2022.
36.
WetterstenJohn. 2022. “Herbert Simon’s Failed Attempt to Explain How Carnapian Psychological Research Could Be Conducted.” In Fallibilist Solutions to Institutional Problems, 78–91. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
37.
WetterstenJ.Forthcoming. “How Popper’s Würzburg Three-World Theory Arose and Developed: a Neglected but Important Aspect of the History of Cognitive Psychology for Psychology Today.” In The Deepening and Widening of Understanding Through Continued Criticism by Critical Rationalists of Critical Rationalist Theories. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
