Social ontology studies the nature and properties of social reality while social metaontology examines the relationship between ontology and the social sciences, which is often treated as a normative question. However, social sciences themselves contain ontological theses, raising the descriptive question of how these internal ontologies relate to the rest of the social sciences. This paper argues that important parts of sociology have an anti-foundationalist metaontology. This descriptive claim is used to build a normative argument against foundationalism and is supported by examining the works of Durkheim and Weber and how their metaontological beliefs continue to influence many sociologists.
BabbieEarl R.1998 (2014). The Basics of Social Research. 6th ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
BeiserFrederick C.2011. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BerthelotJean-Michel. 2000. “Sociologie et ontologie.” In L’enquête ontologique: Du mode d’existence des objets sociaux, edited by LivetPierreOgienRuwen, 65-84. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
4.
DurkheimÉmile. 1895 (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. Edited by LukesSteven. Translated by W. D. Halls. New York: Free Press.
5.
DurkheimÉmile. 1897 (2002). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Edited by SimpsonGeorge. Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. London: Routledge.
6.
EpsteinBrian. 2015. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
KincaidHarold. 2021. “Concrete Ontology: Comments on Lauer, Little, and Lohse.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences51 (1): 40-47.
8.
KivinenOsmoPiiroinenTero. 2006. “Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism: From Philosophizing Sociology to Sociologizing Philosophy.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences36 (3): 303-329.
9.
LauerRichard. 2019. “Is Social Ontology Prior to Social Scientific Methodology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences49 (3): 171-189.
10.
LauerRichard. 2021. “Instrumentalizing and Naturalizing Social Ontology: Replies to Lohse and Little.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences51 (1): 24-39.
11.
LohseSimon. 2017. “Pragmatism, Ontology, and Philosophy of the Social Sciences in Practice.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences47 (1): 3-27.
12.
LohseSimon. 2021. “Ontological Investigations of a Pragmatic Kind? A Reply to Lauer.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences51 (1): 3-12.
13.
NeumanW. Lawrence. 1991 (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th ed.Essex, UK: Pearson.
14.
RayVictor. 2019. “A Theory of Racialized Organizations.” American Sociological Review28 (1): 26-53.
15.
SaundersDaniel. 2020. “Optimism for Naturalized Social Metaphysics: A Reply to Hawley.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences50 (2): 138-160.
16.
SearleJohn R.2008. “Language and Social Ontology.” Theory and Society37 (5): 443-459.
17.
SmallMario L.AdlerLaura. 2019. “The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties.” Annual Review of Sociology45: 111-132.
18.
WeberMax. 1904 (1949). “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy.” In Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited by ShilsEdward A.FinchHenry A., 50-112. Translated by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
19.
WeberMax. 1905–6 (1975). “Knies and the Problem of Irrationality (I: The Irrationality of Action).” In Roscher and Knies: The Logical Problem of HistoricalEconomics, 93-207; 236-281. Translated by Guy Oakes. New York: Free Press.
