This comment discusses the suggestions made in Mahoney’s “Constructivist Set-Theoretic Analysis: An Alternative to Essentialist Social Science” (2023). Mahoney presents an approach to cases of intersectionality or confounding which produce causal results unlike those that result from traditional net effects causal modeling. He presents it as an alternative to “essentialism,” which he describes as a cognitive error. These alternatives have the same problems as those he attributes to net effects analysis, with one exception: the method does allow for the identification of subpopulations with different causal mechanisms producing different outcomes for this subpopulation.
CartwrightNancy.2022 (2006). “From Causation to Explanation and Back.” In The Future for Philosophy, edited by Brian Leiter, 230–45, Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/73975.pdf.
3.
GigerenzerGerd. 2002. Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
HartmannStephanWouterMeijs. 2012. “Walter the Banker: The Conjunction Fallacy Reconsidered.” Synthese184 (1): 73-87. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9694-6
5.
HempelCarl G.PaulOppenheim. 1948. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science15 (2): 135-75. doi:10.1086/286983
6.
HerrnsteinRichard J.CharlesMurray. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
7.
HollandPaul W.1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association81 (396): 945-60. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354
8.
KahnemanDaniel. 2011. Thinking: Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
9.
KantImmanuel. 1781 (1958). Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan.
10.
KantImmanuel. 1790 (1968). Critique of Judgment, translated by J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.
11.
McKimVaughnStephenTurner. 1997. Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
12.
MahoneyJames. 2023. “Constructivist Set-Theoretic Analysis: An Alternative to Essentialist Social Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences53 (4): 327-66. doi:10.1177/00483931231178100
13.
RaginCharles C.Peer C.Fiss. 2017. Intersectional Inequality: Race, Class, Test Scores, and Poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
SalmonWesley C.1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
SalmonWesley C.1994. “Causality Without Counterfactuals.” Philosophy of Science61 (2): 297-312. doi:10.1086/289801
16.
TurnerStephen. 1980. “Modeling and Evaluating Theories Involving Sequences: Description of a Formal Method.” Quality and Quantity14 (4): 511-18. doi:10.1007/BF00184717
17.
TurnerStephen. 1982. “On the Relevance of Statistical Relevance Theory.” Theory and Decision14 (2): 195-205. doi:10.1007/BF00133977
18.
TurnerStephen. 1997. “Net Effects: A Short History.” In Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences, edited by McKimVaughnTurnerStephen, 23-45. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
19.
TurnerStephen. 2018. “What Do Narratives Explain? Roth, Mink and Weber.” In Towards a Revival of Analytic Philosophy of History: Around Paul Roth’s Vision of Historical Sciences, edited by BrzechczynKrzysztof, 130-47. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
20.
TurnerStephenRegisFactor. 1981. “Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Weber’s Methodological Writings.” Sociological Review29 (1): 5-29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1981.tb03019
