The paper examines Robert Sugden’s arguments for contractarian economics, which exclude objective valuation. From a metaethical stance we claim that it is possible and desirable to enrich the axiology of contractarian economics to make it more convincing and applicable. Analyzing Sugden’s argument against paternalism, we show that adopting a richer axiology is compatible with the contractarian framework. Examining Sugden’s claim for redistribution, we demonstrate that explaining the psychological stability of a market economy is problematic without a richer axiology. Considering sweatshop problem, we argue that without a richer axiology, contractarian economists are unable to recognize mutually advantageous exploitation. The paper concludes with the postulates on contractarian economics.
BaghramianMariaJ. AdamCarter. 2022. “Relativism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2022 Edition, edited by ZaltaEdward N.. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/relativism
2.
BaileyAdam D.2011. “The Nonworseness Claim and the Moral Permissibility of Better-than-Permissible Acts.” Philosophia39 (2): 237-250.
3.
BinmoreKen. 2007. Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BrennanGeoffreyHartmutKliemt. 2021. “Sugden’s Community of Advantage.” Journal of Economic Methodology28 (4): 374-384.
DanielColdwell,III. 1990. “Pure Neoclassical Exploitation and the Level of Wages.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology49 (1): 21-34.
7.
DeboveStéphaneBaumardBaumardJean-BaptisteAndré. 2016. “Models of the Evolution of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game: A Review and Classification.” Evolution and Human Behavior37 (3): 245-254.
8.
MayerRobert. 2007. “What’s Wrong with Exploitation?” Journal of Applied Philosophy24 (2): 137-150.
9.
MeyersChris. 2004. “Wrongful Beneficence: Exploitation and Third World Sweatshops.” Journal of Social Philosophy35 (3): 319-333.
10.
OstapiukAleksander. 2021. The Eclipse of Value-Free Economics. The Concept of Multiple Self versus Homo Economicus. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
11.
QizilbashMozaffar. 2021. “Reconciling the Liberal Tradition in Normative Economics with the Findings of Behavioural Economics: On J. S. Mill, Libertarian Paternalism and Robert Sugden’s The Community of Advantage.” Journal of Economic Methodology28 (4): 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1988131
12.
RawlsJohn. 1971 (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
SenAmartya. 1985. “Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy82 (4): 169-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
14.
SenAmartya. 1993. “Positional Objectivity.” Philosophy and Public Affairs22 (2): 126-145.
15.
SugdenRobert. 2004. “The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences.” American Economic Review94 (4): 1014-1033.
16.
SugdenRobert. 2008. “Why Incoherent Preferences Do Not Justify Paternalism.” Constitutional Political Economy19 (3): 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9043-7
SugdenRobert. 2018a. “What Should Economists Do Now?” In James M. Buchanan: A Theorist of Political Economy and Social Philosophy, edited by WagnerR. E., 13-37. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3
19.
SugdenRobert. 2018b. The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
TatarkiewiczWładysław. 1971. Droga do filozofii. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
21.
WertheimerAlan. 1999. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
ZwolinskiMattBenjaminFergusonAlanWertheimer. 2022. “Exploitation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2022 Edition, edited by ZaltaEdward N.NodelmanUri. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/exploitation/
