BarryBrian. 1994. The Liberal Theory of Justice: A Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in A Theory of Justice by John Rawls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
FeyerabendPaul. 1975. Against Method: An Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. New York: New Left Books.
3.
FoucaultMichel. 1977. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, Edited by GordonColin; translated by Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon Books.
4.
FullerSteve. 2016. The Academic Caesar: University Leadership is Hard. London: Sage Swifts.
5.
FullerSteve. 2018. Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. London and New York: Anthem Press.
6.
KhorDarius. 2021. “The Game and How Play It: A Review of Fuller’s A Player’s Guide to the Post-Truth Condition.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective10 (5): 52‐55.
7.
LatourBruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry30 (Winter 2004): 225‐248.
8.
LyotardJean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge [1979]. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
MassimiMichaela. 2018. “Four Kinds of Perspectival Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchXCVI (2): 342‐359.
10.
MertonRobert k. 1973/1942. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267‐278. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
PopperKarl R. 1962. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
12.
RawlsJohn. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
SassowerRaphael. 2015. Compromising the Ideals of Science. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
SassowerRaphael. 2020. The Specter of Hypocrisy: Testing the Limits of Moral Conduct. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
ScottJoan W. 1988. “Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism.” Feminist Studies14 (No. 1 (Spring, 1988)): 32‐50.
