This paper discusses Agassi’s critique of Popper’s theory of the “empirical basis”. It argues that Popper’s theory should be interpreted with emphasis on its realism and anti-subjectivism, and as stressing a tentative inter-subjective consensus as to what is observed when tests are made. It agrees with Agassi’s critique of “sensationalism”, disagrees that there are residues of “sensationalism” in Popper’s approach, and argues that Popper’s view should be supplemented by a tentative realist metaphysics.
AgassiJoseph. 1956. The Function of Interpretations in Physics. PhD thesis, University of London.
2.
AgassiJoseph. 1964. “The Nature of Scientific Problems and their Roots in Metaphysics.” In The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, edited by BungeMario, 189-211. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
3.
AgassiJoseph. 1966. “Sensationalism.” Mind N.S75(297): 1-24.
4.
AgassiJoseph. 1971. Faraday as Natural Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
AnderssonGunnar. 2016. “The Problem of the Empirical Basis in Critical Rationalism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Popper, edited by ShearmurJ.StokesG., 125-142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
KantImmanuel. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, tr. SmithNorman Kemp. London: Macmillan.
7.
NozickRobert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
PopperKarl. 1934. Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Julius Springer.
9.
PopperKarl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
10.
PopperKarl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
11.
PopperKarl. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 3rd ed.London: Routledge.
PopperKarlJohnEccles. 1983(1977). The Self and Its Brain. London: Routledge.
14.
PopperKarl. 1994. The Myth of the Framework, edited by NotturnoMark. London: Routledge.
15.
PopperKarl. 2012. After the Open Society edited by Jeremy Shearmur and Piers Norris Turner. London: Routledge.
16.
ShearmurJeremy. 1996. The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.
17.
ShearmurJeremy. 2006. “Karl Popper and the Empirical Basis.” In Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, volume II, edited by JarvieIanMilfordKarlMillerDavid, 197-210. Aldershot: Ashgate.
18.
ShearmurJeremy. 2009. “Critical Rationalism and Ethics.” In Rethinking Popper, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272, edited by ParusnikováZuzanaCohenRobert S., 339-356. Dordrecht and London: Springer.
19.
WatkinsJohn. 1984. Science and Scepticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
ZaharElie. 1989. “John Watkins on the Empirical Basis and the Corroboration of Scientific Theories.” In Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins, edited by D’AgostinoF.JarvieI., 325-341. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21.
ZaharElie. 1995. “The Problem of the Empirical Basis.” In Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems, edited by O’HearA., 45-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
