Brian Epstein has recently argued that a thoroughly microfoundationalist approach towards economics is unconvincing for metaphysical reasons. Generally, Epstein argues that for an improvement in the methodology of social science we must adopt social ontology as the foundation of social sciences; that is, the standing microfoundationalist debate could be solved by fixing economics’ ontology. However, as I show in this paper, fixing the social ontology prior to the process of model construction is optional instead of necessary and that metaphysical-ontological commitments are often the outcome of model construction, not its starting point. By focusing on the practice of modeling in economics the paper provides a useful inroad into the debate about the role of metaphysics in the natural and social sciences more generally.
AhmedArif. 2016. “Grounded.” TLS: The Times Literary Supplement, April 27, 25.
2.
AlexandrovaAnna. 2006. “Connecting Economic Models to the Real World: Game Theory and the FCC Spectrum Auction.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences36(2): 173–92.
3.
Bailer-JonesDaniela M.2003. “When Scientific Models Represent.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science17: 59–74.
4.
BattermanRobert W.2009. “Idealization and Modeling.” Synthese169(3): 427–46.
5.
BoumansMorgan. 1999. “Built-in Justification.” In Models as Mediators: Perspective on Natural and Social Science edited by MorrisonMary, pp. 66–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CartwrightNancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
CartwrightNancy. 2007. The Vanity of Rigour in Economics: Theoretical Models and Galilean Experiment. Hunting causes and using them, (pp. 31–66). Cambridge: Cambridge Universuty Press.
8.
ContessaGabriele. 2007. “Representation, Interpretation, and Surrogative Reasoning.” Philosophy of Science, 71: 48–68.
9.
Di IorioFrancesco. 2018. “Book Review: The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences, by Brian Epstein.” Philosophy of the Social Science48(1): 105–135.
10.
ElginCatherine. 2011. “Understanding’s Tethers.” In Epistemology: Context, Values, and Disagreement edited by LöfflerWinifrid, Berlin:De Gruyter 131–146. Ontos Verlag.
EpsteinBrain. 2014. “Why Macroeconomics does not Supervene on Microeconomics.” Journal of Economic Methodology21(1): 3–18.
15.
EpsteinB Brain. 2015. The ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford Studies in Philosophy o.
16.
FriggRoman. 2009. “Models and Fiction.” Synthese172(2): 251–268.
17.
FrydmanRomanPhelpsEdmund S. (eds). 2013. Rethinking Expectations: The Way Forward for Macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
GiereRonald N.2004. “How Models are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science (Symposia)71: 742–752.
19.
GindisDavid. 2009. “From Fictions and Aggregates to Real Entities in the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Institutional Economics5: 25–46.
20.
HausmanDaniel1990. “Supply and Demand Explanation and their Ceteris Paribus Clauses.” Review of Political Economy2:168–87.
21.
HausmanDaniel. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HempelCarl. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.
23.
HooverKevin. 2001. Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge University Press.
JevonsWilliam Stanely. 1871. The Theory of Political EconomyLondon: Penguin.
26.
JonesCharles. 2002. An Introduction to Economic Growth (2nd ed.), New York: Norton.
27.
KhalifaKareem. 2012. “Inaugurating Understanding or Repackaging Explanation?” Philosophy of Science79(1): 15–37.
28.
KincaidHarold. 2013. “Introduction: Pursuing a Naturalist Metaphysics.” In Scientific Metaphysics edited by KincaidHarold, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/663235
29.
KnuuttilaTarja. 2011. “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A42(2): 262–271.
30.
KnuuttilaTarjaMorganMary S.2019. “De-idealization: No Easy Reversals.” Philosophy of Science86(4): 641–61.
31.
LauerRichard. 2017. “Predictive Success and Non-Individualists Models in Social Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences47(2): 145–61.
32.
LohseSimon. 2017. “Pragmatism, Ontology, and Philosophy of the Social Sciences in Practice.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences47(1): 3–27.
33.
LoweE. J.2002. Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
LukesSteven. 1977. “Methodological Individualism Reconsidered.” In LukesS., (Ed.), Essays in social theory (pp. 177–186). New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
McMullinErnan. 1985. “Galilean Idealization.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A16(3): 247–73.
36.
MorganMary S.MargaretMorrisonQuentinSkinner. (eds.). 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science (Vol. 52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MorganMary S.2006. “Economic Man as Model Man: Ideal Types, Idealizations and Caricatures.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought28(1): 1–27.
38.
MorganMary S.2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Pérez-GonzálezSaúl. 2020. “Mechanistic Explanations and Components of Social Mechanism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science10(3): 1–18.
40.
PotochnikAngela. 2015. “Causal Patterns and Adequate Explanations.” Philosophical Studies172(5): 1163–82.
41.
RicardoDavid. 1815. “The Influence of a Low Price of Corn of the Profits of Stock”. In Sraffa, Vol. IV.
42.
RomerPaul M.1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy98(5, Part 2): S71–102.
43.
RuizNadia (forthcoming). Microfoundations and Methodology: A Complexity-Based Reconceptualization of the Debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
44.
SalmonWesley. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45.
SchafferJonathan. (forthcoming). Anchoring as grounding: On Epstein’s the ant trap. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research99(3): 749–767.
46.
SchulzArmin. 2016. “Firms, Agency, and Evolution.” Journal of Economic Methodology23(1): 57–76.
47.
SearleJohn. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
48.
SearleJohn. 2009. “Language and Social Ontology.” In Philosophy of the Social Sciences edited by MantzavinosC., (pp. 9–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
SuárezMauricio. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Isomorphism and Similarity.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science17(3): 225–244.
50.
SugdenRobert. 2016. “Ontology, Methodological Individualism, and the Foundations of the Social Sciences.” Journal of Economic Literature54(4): 1377–1389.
51.
WeisbergMichael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
WeisbergMichael. 2007. “Who is a Modeler?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science58(2): 207–233.
53.
WilsonMark. 2006. Wandering Significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
