In this essay, I examine the usage of the term “just-so story.” I attempt to show that just-so storytelling can be seen as an epistemic concept that, in various ways, tackles the epistemological and methodological problems relating to evolutionary explanations qua historical/narrative explanations. I identify two main, yet mutually exclusive, strategies of employing the concept of a just-so story: a negative strategy and a positive strategy. Subsequently, I argue that these strategies do not satisfactorily capture the core of the “original” meaning advanced by Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin at the end of the 1970s. I revisit the foundation(s) of their anti-adaptationist critique in order to reframe it as a critique of distinctive methodological manners and epistemic maxims related to historical inquiry. Last but not least, I suggest that contemporary evolutionary thinkers have two conceptually different options: they can either adhere to the “original” meaning of the term “just-so story” or accept that “just-so story” is a term equivalent to “implausible narrative explanation.”
AndrewsP. W.GangestadS. W.MatthewsD.2002. “Adaptationism—How to Carry Out an Exaptationist Program.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences25 (4): 489-504.
2.
BarashD. P.LiptonJ. E.2010. How Women Got Their Curves and Other Just-So Stories: Evolutionary Enigmas. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
BeattyJ.1984. “Chance and Natural Selection.” Philosophy of Science51 (2): 183-211.
4.
BeattyJ.1986. “Pluralism and Panselectionism.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by AsquithP.D.KitcherP.. Vol. 2, 113-28. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
5.
BeattyJ.CarreraI.2011. “When What Had to Happen Was Not Bound to Happen: History, Chance, Narrative, Evolution.” Journal of the Philosophy of History5 (3): 471-95.
BockW. J.1979. “The Synthetic Explanation of Macroevolutionary Change—A Reductionist Approach.” Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History13:20-69.
8.
BonninT.2019. “Evidential Reasoning in Historical Sciences: Applying Toulmin Schemes to the Case of Archezoa.” Biology & Philosophy34 (2): 30.
9.
BrandonR. N.1990. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.
BullerD. J.2006. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT press.
11.
BussD. M.HaseltonM. G.ShackelfordT. K.BleskeA. L.WakefieldJ. C.1998. “Adaptations, Exaptations, and Spandrels.” American Psychologist53 (5): 533-48.
12.
CarrollJ.JohnsonJ. A.SalmonC.Kjeldgaard-ChristiansenJ.ClasenM.JonssonE.2017. “A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of Beliefs about Human Nature, Culture, and Science.” Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture1 (1): 1-32.
13.
ClelandC. E.2011. “Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science62 (3): 551-82.
14.
CurrieA.SterelnyK.2017. “In Defence of Story-Telling.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science62:14-21.
15.
CurrieA.TurnerD.2016. “Introduction: Scientific Knowledge of the Deep Past.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A55:43-46.
16.
DarwinC. (1871) 1889. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: D. Appleton.
17.
DennettD. C.1996. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
18.
DesjardinsE.2011. “Historicity and Experimental Evolution.” Biology & Philosophy26 (3): 339-64.
19.
EldredgeN.1983. “A la recherche du docteur Pangloss.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences6 (3): 361-62.
20.
Godfrey-SmithP.2001. “Three Kinds of Adaptationism.” In Adaptationism and Optimality, edited by OrzackS. H.SoberE., 335-57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GoodenoughW. H.1976. “On the Origin of Matrilineal Clans: A ‘Just So’ Story.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society120 (1): 21-36.
23.
GottschallJ.2008. Literature, Science, and a New Humanities. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
24.
GouldS. J.1978. “Sociobiology: The Art of Storytelling.” New Scientist80 (1129): 530-33.
25.
GouldS. J.1980. The Panda’s Thumb. New York: W.W. Norton.
26.
GouldS. J.1983. “The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis.” In Dimensions of Darwinism: Themes and Counterthemes in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Theory, edited by GreneM.71-93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GouldS. J.1989. Wonderful Life. New York: W.W. Norton.
28.
GouldS. J.1991. “Exaptation: A Crucial Tool for an Evolutionary Psychology.” Journal of Social Issues47 (3): 43-65.
29.
GouldS. J.1997. “The Exaptive Excellence of Spandrels as a Term and Prototype.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences94 (20): 10750-55.
30.
GouldS. J.2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
GouldS. J.LewontinR. C.1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences205 (1161): 581-98.
32.
GouldS. J.VrbaE. S.1982. “Exaptation—A Missing Term in the Science of Form.” Paleobiology8 (1): 4-15.
33.
GriffithsP. E.1996. “The Historical Turn in the Study of Adaptation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science47 (4): 511-32.
34.
GriffithsP. E.1997. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
HeyesC.2018. Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36.
HullD.1975. “Central Subjects and Historical Narratives.” History and Theory14 (3): 253-74.
KingR. J.2008. “Fishing into Our Past: [A review of Neil Shubin’s ‘Your Inner Fish’: Allen Lane, London, 2008.].” Evolutionary Psychology6:365-68.
39.
KiplingR.1902. Just So Stories for Little Children. London: McMillan.
40.
KuukkanenJ.-M.2015. Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
LevyG.2013. “The Prospects and Pitfalls of ‘Just-So’ Storytelling in Evolutionary Accounts of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion25 (4-5): 451-59.
42.
LewensT.2009. “Seven Types of Adaptationism.” Biology & Philosophy24 (2): 161-82.
43.
LewontinR. C.1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
LewontinR. C.1976a. “Sociobiology–A Caricature of Darwinism.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by SuppeF.AsquithP. D.. Vol. 2, 22-31. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.
45.
LewontinR. C.1976b. “Sociobiology—A Caricature of Selection Theory.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Philosophy of Science Association. https://www.matierevolution.fr/spip.php?article286.
LewontinR. C.1979. “Sociobiology as an Adaptationist Program.” Behavioral Science24 (1): 5-14.
48.
LewontinR. C.1990. “The Evolution of Cognition.” In Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, edited by OshersonD. N.SmithE. E., 229-46. Cambridge: MIT Press.
49.
LewontinR. C.1991. “Facts and the Factitious in Natural Sciences.” Critical Inquiry18 (1): 140-53.
50.
LloydE. A.2015. “Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly about Evolutionary Causes.” Biological Theory10 (4): 343-62.
51.
LososJ. B.2017. Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, and the Future of Evolution. New York: Penguin.
52.
LoveG. A.2003. Practical Ecocriticism: Literature, Biology, and the Environment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
53.
MacheryE.2008. “A Plea for Human Nature.” Philosophical Psychology21 (3): 321-29.
54.
MayrE.1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
55.
MayrE.2000. “Darwin’s Influence on Modern Thought.” Scientific American283:78-83.
56.
MercierH.SperberD.2017. The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
57.
MorganM. S.WiseN. M.2017. “Narrative Science and Narrative Knowing. Introduction to Special Issue on Narrative Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A62:1-5.
58.
NelsonL. H.2003. “The Descent of Evolutionary Explanations: Darwinian Vestiges in the Social Sciences.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by RothP. A.TurnerS. 258-90. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
59.
NovaesC. D.2018. “The Enduring Enigma of Reason.” Mind & Language33 (5): 513-24.
60.
OmanM. C.2012. “Are Evolutionary Hypotheses for Motion Sickness ‘Just-So’ Stories?” Journal of Vestibular Research22 (2): 117-27.
61.
PearsonC.2018. “How-Possibly Explanation in Biology: Lessons from Wilhelm His’s ‘Simple Experiments’ Models.” Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology10:1-15.
62.
PortmannA.1964a. Animals as Social Beings. Translated by CoburnO.New York: Harper & Row.
63.
PortmannA.1964b. New Paths in Biology. Translated by PomeransA. J.New York: Harper & Row.
64.
RichardsonR. C.2017. Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
65.
RosenbergA.2002. “Reductionism in an Historical Science.” In Promises and Limits of Reductionism in the Biomedical Sciences, edited by Van RegenmortelM. H.HullD. L.Hoboken: John Wiley.
66.
RosenbergA.2005. “Lessons from Biology for Philosophy of the Human Sciences.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences35 (1): 3-19.
67.
RosenbergA.2018. How History Gets Things Wrong: The Neuroscience of Our Addiction to Stories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
68.
RosenbergA.McSheaD. W.2008. Philosophy of Biology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
69.
RothP. A. 2019. The Philosophical Structure of Historical Explanation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
70.
RothP. A.2017. “Essentially Narrative Explanations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A62:42-50.
71.
SegerstraleU.2000. Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
SesardicN.2003. “Evolution of Human Jealousy: A Just-So Story or a Just-So Criticism?” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science33 (4): 427-43.
73.
SmithR. J.2016a. “Explanations for Adaptations, Just-So Stories, and Limitations on Evidence in Evolutionary Biology.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews25 (6): 276-87.
74.
SmithR. J.2016b. “Freud and Evolutionary Anthropology’s First Just-So Story.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews25 (2): 50-53.
WittgensteinL.1975. Philosophical Remarks. Edited by BlackwellB.RheesR., Translated by HargreavesR.WhiteR.Oxford: Blackwell.
80.
WoeseC. R.1980. “Just So Stories and Rube Goldberg Machines: Speculations on the Origin of the Protein Synthetic Machinery.” In Ribosomes: Structure, Function and Genetics, edited by ChamblissG.CravenR. G.DaviesJ.DavisK.KahanL.NomuraM., 357-73. Baltimore: University Park Press.
81.
WongT. W.2019. “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis and Evolutionary Idiosyncrasies.” Biology & Philosophy34 (2): 22.
