This article is a reply to Richard Lauer’s “Is Social Ontology Prior to Social Scientific Methodology?” and an attempt to contribute to the meta-social ontological discourse more broadly. In the first part I will give a rough sketch of Lauer’s general project and confront his pragmatist approach with a fundamental problem. The second part of my reply will provide a solution for this problem rooted in a philosophy of the social sciences in practice.
KivinenO.PiiroinenT.2006. “Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism: From Philosophizing Sociology to Sociologizing Philosophy.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences36 (3): 303-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393106289794
7.
LauerR.2019. “Is Social Ontology Prior to Social Scientific Methodology?”Philosophy of the Social Sciences49(3): 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393119840328
8.
LittleD.2009. “The Heterogeneous Social: New Thinking about the Foundations of the Social Sciences.” In Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, edited by MantzavinosC. 154-78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
LohseS.2017. “Pragmatism, Ontology, and Philosophy of the Social Sciences in Practice.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences47 (1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116654869
10.
LohseS.2019. Die Eigenständigkeit des Sozialen. Zur ontologischen Kritik des Individualismus. Heidelberg: Mohr Siebeck.
ReydonT. A. C.ScholzM.2009. “Why Organizational Ecology Is Not a Darwinian Research Program.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences39 (3): 408-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393108325331
13.
SearleJ. R.1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
14.
SearleJ. R.2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
SolerL.ZwartS.LynchM.Israel-JostV., eds. 2014. Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science. New York: Routledge.
TsilipakosL.2012. “The Poverty of Ontological Reasoning.”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour42 (2): 201-19.
18.
van BouwelJ. 2004. “Individualism and Holism, Reduction and Pluralism: A Comment on Keith Sawyer and Julie Zahle.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences34 (4): 527-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104269198
19.
van BouwelJ.WeberE. 2008. “De-ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based on Epistemic Interests.”Human Studies31 (4): 423-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-008-9102-0
