In this short discussion note, I cast doubt upon the common view that social groups persist throughout changes in their membership, by virtue of the maintenance of their structure and/or function. I offer two counterexamples, and consider two possible responses to a natural objection to them, neither of which support the view that it is a metaphysical truth that social groups persist through changes in their membership, or persist by virtue of the maintenance of their structure and/or function.
DurkheimÉ. (1895) 1982. “The Rules of Sociological Method.” In Durkheim: The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology, edited by LukesS. and translated by HallsW. D., pp. 1-163. New York: Macmillan.
2.
EffinghamN.2010. “The Metaphysics of Groups.” Philosophical Studies149:21-67.
3.
KutzC.2000. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
LockeJ.1689. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by NiddichP. H.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5.
ParfitD.1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
RaddenJ.1996. Divided Minds and Successive Selves: Ethical Issues in Disorders of Identity and Personality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
RichieK.2015. “The Metaphysics of Social Groups.” Philosophical Compass10:310-21.
