It is often claimed that formal and optimizing norms of the standard conception of rationality and the heuristics of the bounded rationality approach are at odds with one another. This claim, I argue, is an overly complex one. In order to discuss it adequately, I introduce two sets of distinctions: (a) a system of different kinds of relations between conceptions of rationality, namely relations of elimination, compatibility, and complementarity, and (b) three different levels of possible relations between rules of different theories of rationality—the levels of empirical explanation, normative justification, and normative prescription. I argue that formal and bounded rules are compatible and complementary at the levels of explanation and justification, but probably not so at the level of prescription.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ.1996. Are Humans Good Intuitive Statisticians After All?Cognition, 58, 1-73.
3.
EricksonP.KleinJ.DastonL.LemovR.SturmT.GordinM.2013. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
EvansJ. S. B. T. 1991. “Theories of Human Reasoning: The Fragmented State of the Art.” Theory & Psychology1:83-105.
5.
EvansJ. S. B. T. 2003. “In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning.” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences7 (10): 454-59.
6.
GigerenzerG.1991. “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond ‘Heuristics and Biases.’” European Review of Social Psychology2:83-115.
7.
GigerenzerG.1996. “Rationality: Why Social Context Matters.” In Interactive Minds, edited by BaltesP. B.StaudingerUrsula M., 319-46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
GigerenzerG.1998. “Psychological Challenges for Normative Models.” In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, edited by GabbayD. M.SmetsP., vol. 1, 441-67. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9.
GigerenzerG.2007. Gut Feelings. London: Penguin.
10.
GigerenzerG.HoffrageU.1995. “How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats.” Psychological Review102:684-704.
11.
GigerenzerG.SeltenR.2001. “Rethinking Rationality.” In Bounded Rationality, edited by GigerenzerG.SeltenR., 1-12. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
GigerenzerG.SwijtinkZ.PorterT.DastonL.BeattyJ.KrügerL.1989. The Empire of Chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GigerenzerG.ToddP. M., and ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD.2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GoldsteinD. G.GigerenzerG.2002. “Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic.” Psychological Review109:75-90.
16.
GriceP.1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited by ColeP.MorganJ. L., 41-58. New York: Academic.
17.
GriceP.2001. Aspects of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
GüthW.SchmittbergerR.SchwarzeB.1982. “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization3:367-88.
HerfeldC.2018. “Explaining Patterns, Not Details: Reevaluating Rational Choice Models in Light of Their Explananda.” Journal of Economic Methodology25:179-209.
21.
KahnemanD.2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” American Economic Review93:1449-75.
22.
KahnemanD.2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.
23.
KahnemanD.FrederickS.2002. “Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment.” In Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edited by GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD., 49-83. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA., eds. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KantI. (1781) 1787. Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft, edited by TimmermannJ. (1998). Hamburg: Meiner.
26.
KnauffM.SpohnW., eds. Forthcoming. Handbook on Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
KrügerL.1980. “Intertheoretic Relations as a Tool for the Rational Reconstruction of Scientific Development.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science11:89-101.
28.
KruglanskiA. W.GigerenzerG.2011. “Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles.” Psychological Review118:97-109.
29.
KuhnT.1977. “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” In The Essential Tension, edited by KuhnT., 320-39. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LeeM. D.LoughlinN.LundbergI. B.2002. “Applying One Reason Decision-Making: The prioritisation of literature searches.” Australian Journal of Psychology54:137-43.
31.
MartignonL.Blackmond LaskeyK.1999. Bayesian Benchmarks for Fast and Frugal Heuristics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
MartignonL.HoffrageU.1999. “Why Does One-Reason Decision Making Work? A Case Study in Ecological Rationality.” In Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart, edited by GigerenzerG.ToddP. M., and The ABC Research Group, 119-40. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
MeleA.RawlingsP., eds. 2004. The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
MercierH.SperberD.2017. The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
MichaelewiczZ.FogelD.2000. How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics. New York: Springer.
36.
MorgensternO.von NeumannJ.1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37.
NisbettR. B.RossL.1980. Human Inference: Strategies and shortcomings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
OaksfordM.ChaterN.1991. “Bounded Rationality in Taking Risks and Drawing Inferences.” Theory & Psychology2:225-30.
39.
Piattelli-PalmariniM.1994. Inevitable Illusions: How Mistakes of Reason Rule Our Minds. New York: Wiley.
40.
ReisbergD.1997. Cognition. New York: W.W. Norton.
41.
SamuelsR.StichS.BishopM.2002. “Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes about Human Rationality Disappear.” In Common Sense, Reasoning and Rationality, edited by ElioR., 236-68. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
SimonH.1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review63:129-38.
43.
SimonH.1957. Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
44.
SklarL.1967. “Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science18:109-24.
45.
SteinE.1996. Without Good Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46.
StenningK.Van LambalgenM.2008. Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
StichS.1990. The Fragmentation of Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
SturmT.2009. KantUnd Die Wissenschaftenvom Menschen. Paderborn, Germany: Mentis.
49.
SturmT.2012. “The ‘Rationality Wars’ in Psychology: Where they Are and Where they Could Go.” Inquiry55:66-81.
50.
SturmT.2019. “Philosophical Naturalism and Bounded rationality.” In Handbook on Bounded Rationality, edited by KatsikopoulosK.VialeR.London: Routledge.
51.
SturmT. Forthcoming. “The Descriptive/Normative Divide in Theories of rationality.” In Handbook on Rationality, edited by KnauffM.SpohnW.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ToddP.GigerenzerG.2000. “Précis of Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences23:727-80.
54.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.1983. “Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.” Psychological Review90:293-315.
55.
Ulises MoulinesC. 2014. “Intertheoretical Relations and the Dynamics of Science.” Erkenntnis79:1-15.
56.
VialeR.KatsikopoulosK., eds. 2019. Handbook of Bounded Rationality. London: Routledge.
57.
WasonP.1966. “Reasoning about a Rule.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20:273-81.
58.
WasonP.1983. “Realism and Rationality in the Selection Task.” In Thinking and Reasoning, edited by St. B. T. EvansJ., 44–75. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
