Methodological divisions in sociology, the study of the social, are not just deep and persistent but patterned—most obviously in the separate development of qualitative methods in ethnography and grounded theory, but also in subsidiary divisions within those separations, following the same pattern. The pattern being too deep-rooted to be explained as empirical happenstance, it will be explored here as the effect of an equally deep-rooted condition. More exactly, through postulating that sociology’s subject-matter, the social, is ontologically rooted in an essential ambiguity between abstraction and individuation. Four criteria are drawn from the idea of the dichotomy being constitutively essential, which this or any alternative candidates must meet. The article conducts the postulate through the criteria, and applies the criterion of separating better from worse sociological theory to the work of Pierre Bourdieu.
AlexanderJeffrey. 1988. “The New Theoretical Movement.” In Handbook of Sociology, edited by SmelserN. J., 77-101. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AlexanderJeffrey. 1995. Fin de Siècle Social Theory. London: Verso.
3.
AndersonLeon. 2006. “Analytical Autoethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33:373-95.
4.
ApramianTavisCristanchoSayraWatlingChrisLingardLorelei. 2017. “(Re)Grounding Grounded Theory: A Close Reading of Theory in Four Schools.” Qualitative Research17 (4): 359-76.
5.
ArcherMargaret. 2010. “Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism.” Sociological Theory28 (3): 272-303.
6.
AtkinsonWill. 2010. “Phenomenological Additions to the Bourdieusian Toolbox: Two Problems for Bourdieu, Two Solutions from Schutz.” Sociological Theory28 (1): 1-19.
7.
BesbrisMaxKhanShamus. 2017. “Less Theory, More Description.” Sociological Theory35 (2): 147-53.
8.
BourdieuPierre. 1962. The Algerians. Boston: Beacon Press.
9.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
BourdieuPierre. 1988. “Vive la Crise: For Heterodoxy in Social Science.” Theory and Society17 (5): 773-87.
11.
BourgeoisPhilippe. 1995. In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrownSteven G.SidneyDobrin eds. 2004. Ethnography Unbound: From Theory Shock to Critical Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13.
BrunerEdward M.1993. “Introduction: The Ethnographic Self and the Personal Self.” In Anthropology and Literature, edited by BensonPaul, 1-26. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
ClarkeAdele. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15.
DeleuzeGilles. 2004. “On Nietzsche and the Image of Thought.” In Desert Islands and Other Texts, 1953-1974, edited by DeleuzeG., 135-142. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
16.
DeleuzeGillesGuattariFelix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by MasumiBrian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
DiversiMarcello. 1998. “Glimpses of Street Life: Representing Lived Experience through Short Stories.” Qualitative Inquiry49:131-47.
19.
DoddStuart C.1942. Dimensions of Society: A Quantitative Systematics for the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.
20.
DouglasJack D., ed. 1970. Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine.
21.
DurkheimEmile [1912] 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by SwainJ.London: Allen & Unwin.
22.
DurkheimEmile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Method. Edited with an introduction by LukesSteven, translated by HallW. D.New York: The Free Press.
23.
Elder-VassDave. 2007. “Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action.” Sociological Theory25 (4): 325-46.
24.
EllisCaroline S.BochnerArthur P.2006. “Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33:429-49.
25.
EvensT. M. S.1999. “Bourdieu and the Logic of Practice: Is All Giving Indian-Giving or Is ‘Generalized Materialism’ Not Enough?” Sociological Theory17 (1): 3-31.
26.
GeertzClifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27.
GeimerAlexander. 2015. “Varieties of ‘Sociological Enlightenment’: Critical Arts-Based Inquiry versus German Reconstruction Social Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods14:16-35.
28.
GerransPhilip. 2005. “Tacit Knowledge, Rule Following, and Pierre Bourdieu’s Philosophy of Social Science.” Anthropological Theory5 (1): 53-74.
29.
GibsonDavid R.2011. “Avoiding Catastrophe: The Interactional Production of Possibility during the Cuban Missile Crisis.” American Journal of Sociology117 (2): 361-419.
30.
GivenLisa M.2017. “It’s a New Year . . . So Let’s Stop the Paradigm Wars.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods16:1-2.
31.
GlaserBarney G.1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
32.
GlaserBarney G.1992. Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
33.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
34.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Society. Garden City: Doubleday.
GoffmanErving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
GoldRaymond. 1997. “The Ethnographic Method in Sociology.” Qualitative Inquiry3 (4): 388-402.
38.
GrindalBruce T.ShephardWilliam H.1993. “Redneck Girl: From Experience to Performance.” In Anthropology and Literature, edited by BensonPaul, 151-72. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
39.
HallidayTerrance C.1992. “Sociology’s Fragile Professionalism.” In Sociology and Its Publics, edited by HallidayJ. C.JanowitzM., 3-41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
HauserEric. 2011. “Generalization: A Practice of Situated Categorization in Talk.” Human Studies34:183-98.
KingAnthony. 2000. “Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of Habitus.” Sociological Theory18 (3): 417-33.
43.
KuntzAaron M.PresnallMarni M.2012. “Wandering the Tactical: From Interview to Intraview.” Qualitative Inquiry18 (9): 732-44.
44.
LepenniesWolf. 1988. Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
LincolnYvonna S.1998. “The Ethics of Teaching in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry4:315-27.
46.
LukesSteven. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
47.
LukesSteven, ed. 1982. Durkheim, the Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. Introduction by LukesSteven, translated by HallsW. D.New York: Free Press.
48.
LundbergGeorge. 1939. Foundations of Sociology. New York: Macmillan.
49.
LundbergGeorge. 1945. “The Growth of Scientific Method.” American Journal of Sociology50 (6): 502-13.
50.
MillerStevenFredericksMarcel. 1999. “How Does Grounded Theory Explain?” Qualitative Inquiry9:538-51.
51.
MüllerSophie Merit. 2016. “Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Ethnography.” Qualitative Inquiry38:705-17.
52.
RajchamanJ.2001. The Deleuze Connection. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53.
ReedIsaac Ariail. 2010. “Epistemology Contextualized: Social Scientific Knowledge in a Postpositivist Era.” Sociological Theory28 (1): 20-39.
54.
RiceStuart A., ed. 1931. Methods in Social Science: A Case Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
RichardsonLaurel. 1992. “The Poetic Representation of Lives: Writing a Postmodernist Sociology.” In Studies in Symbolic Interaction, edited by DenzinNorman K., vol. 13. Greenwich: JAI Press.
56.
RinehartRichard. 1998. “Fictional Methods in Ethnography.” Qualitative Inquiry4 (2): 220-24.
57.
Roux, Le, and Henry Rouanet Brigitte. 2010. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage.
58.
SacksHarvey. 1972. “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Analysis for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by SudnowDavid, 31-74. New York: The Free Press.
59.
SacksHarvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
SacksHarveySchegloffEmauel A.2007. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Situation.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, edited by EnfieldN. J.StiversT., 23-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
St. PierreElizabeth Adams. 2017. “Haecceity: Laying Out a Plane for Post Qualitative Inquiry.” Qualitative Inquiry23 (9): 686-98.
62.
St. PierreElizabeth AdamsJacksonAlecia Y.2014. “Qualitative Data Analysis after Coding.” Qualitative Inquiry20:715-19.
63.
SimmelGeorg. 1971. On Individuality and Social Form. Edited by LevineD.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
SimmelGeorg. 1980. Essays on Interpretation in Social Science. Translated and edited by OakesG.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
65.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2007. “American Sociology before and after World War II: The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounCraig, 314-366. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
SteinmetzGeorge, ed. 2005. The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham: Duke University Press.
67.
StraussAnselm. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
VandenburgheFréderic. 1999. “The Real Is Relational: An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s Generative Structuralism.” Sociological Theory17 (1): 32-67.
69.
Van MaanenJohn, ed. 1995. Representations in Ethnography. London: Sage.
70.
WacquantLoïc. 2015. “For a Sociology of Flesh and Blood.” Qualitative Sociology38:1-11.
71.
WallSarah Stahlke. 2016. “Toward a Moderate Autoethnography.” International Journal of Qualitative MethodsJanuary-December: 1-9.
72.
WatsonR. 1997. “Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, edited by HesterS.EglinP., 49-75. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, and the University Press of America.
73.
WolffKurt H.1950. “Introduction.” In The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated and edited by WolffKurt H., xvii-lxiii. Glencoe: Free Press.
