In his book, Understanding Institutions, Francesco Guala discusses two solutions to the problem of mindreading for coordination, the solution thinking approach proposed by Adam Morton and the team reasoning approach developed by Michael Bacharach, Robert Sugden, and Natalie Gold. I argue that the family resemblance between the two approaches is even stronger than Guala thinks.
BacharachM.1999. “Interactive Team Reasoning: A Contribution to the Theory of Cooperation.” Research in Economics53:117-47.
2.
BacharachM.2006. Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory. Edited by GoldN.SugdenR.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
BinmoreK.2008. “Do Conventions Need to Be Common Knowledge?” Topoi27:17-27.
4.
GoldN.2012. “Team Reasoning, Framing and Cooperation.” In Evolution and Rationality, edited by OkashaS.BinmoreK., 185-212.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
GoldN.SugdenR.2007a. “Collective Intentions and Team Agency.” Journal of Philosophy104 (3): 109-37.
6.
GoldN.SugdenR.2007b. “Theories of Team Agency.” In Rationality and Commitment, edited by PeterF.SchmidtS., 280-312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
GualaF.2016. Understanding Institutions: The Science and Philosophy of Living Together. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
GualaF.HindriksF.2014. “A Unified Social Ontology.” The Philosophical Quarterly65 (259): 177-201.
9.
HakliR.MillerK.TuomelaR.2010. “Two Kinds of We-Reasoning.” Economics & Philosophy26:291-320.
10.
HindriksF.GualaF.2015. “Institutions, Rules, and Equilibria: A Unified Theory.” Journal of Institutional Economics11 (3): 459-80.
11.
LewisD. K.1969. Convention: A Philosophical Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
LewisD. K.1978. “Truth in Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly15:37-46.
13.
MortonA.1994. “Game Theory and Knowledge by Simulation.” Ratio7 (1): 14-25.
14.
MortonA.2003. The Importance of Being Understood. London: Routledge.
15.
SearleJ. R.1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
TuomelaR.2007. The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View. New York: Oxford.
