The issue of causal comparability in the social sciences underlies matters of both generalization and extrapolation (or external validity). After critiquing two existing interpretations of comparability, due to Hitchcock and Hausman, I propose a distinction between ontological and epistemic comparability. While the former refers to whether two cases are actually comparable, the latter respects that in cases of incomplete information, we need to rely on whatever evidence we have of comparability. I argue, using a political science case study, that in those cases of imperfect information, an epistemic homogeneity criterion can be an adequate justification for generalization.
AntonakisJohnBendahanSamuelJacquartPhilippeLaliveRafael. 2010. “On Making Causal Claims: A Review and Recommendations.” The Leadership Quarterly21: 1086-1120.
2.
BerkRichard A.1983. “An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data.” American Sociological Review48 (3): 386-98.
3.
CartwrightNancyEfstathiouSophia. 2011. “Hunting Causes and Using Them: Is There No Bridge From Here to There?”International Studies in the Philosophy of Science25 (3): 223-41.
4.
CartwrightNancyHardieJeremy. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2001. “Data Issues in the Study of Conflict.” Data Collection on Armed Conflict, Uppsala, 8-9June.
6.
CollierPaulHoefflerAnke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers56 (4): 563-95.
7.
HausmanDaniel M.2010. “Probabilistic Causality and Causal Generalizations.” In The Place of Probability in Science, edited by EellsElleryFetzerJ. H., 47-63. Dordrecht: Springer.
8.
HitchcockChristopher R.1995. “The Mishap at Reichenbach Falls: Singular vs. General Causation.” Philosophical Studies78 (3): 257-91.
9.
HorowitzDonald L.1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
HorowitzShaleHeoUk2008, March26. “Do Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Civil Wars Have Distinct Causes?” Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, CA.
11.
KuorikoskiJaakko. 2012. “Contrastive Statistical Explanation and Causal Heterogeneity.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science2:435-52.
12.
LittleDaniel. 1991. Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Boulder: Westview Press.
13.
PearlJudea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
SalmonWesley C.1971. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15.
SambanisNicholas. 2001. “Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Enquiry (Part I).” The Journal of Conflict Resolution45 (3): 259-82.
16.
SpirtesPeterGlymourClarkScheinesRichard. 1993. Causation, Prediction, and Search. New York: Springer-Verlag.
SpirtesPeterScheinesRichard2004. “Causal Inference of Ambiguous Manipulations.” Philosophy of Science71 (5): 833-845.
19.
SteelDaniel. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
WimmerAndreasCedermanLars-ErikMinBrian. 2009. “Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict: A Configurational Analysis of a New Global Data Set.” American Sociological Review74 (2): 316-37.
21.
WoodwardJames. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
XieYu. 2011. “Population Heterogeneity and Causal Inference.” University of Michigan Population Studies Center Research Report 11-731. Accessed online October 27, 2015, http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/pdf/rr11-731.pdf
