Many philosophers regard collective behavior and attitudes as the ground of the whole of social reality. According to this popular view, society is composed basically of collective intentions and cooperative behaviors; this is so both for informal contexts involving small groups and for complex institutional structures. In this article, I challenge this view, and propose an alternative approach, which I term institutional externalism. I argue that institutions are characterized by the tendency to defer to elements that are external to the content of collective intentions—such as laws, declarations, and contracts. According to institutional externalism, those elements are the grounds of institutional statutes, rights, and duties.
AokiM.2011. “Institutions as Cognitive Media between Strategic Interactions and Individual Beliefs.”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization79:20-34.
2.
AppiahA. K.2006. “How to Decide if Races Exist.”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society106:365-82.
BurgeT.1977. Belief De Re.”The Journal of Philosophy74:338-62.
5.
ClarkA.1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
CorreiaF.SchniederB. eds. 2013. Grounding and Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FerrarisM.(2009) 2012. Documentality: Why It Is Necessary to Leave Traces. New York: Fordham University Press.
8.
FerrarisM.TorrengoG.2014. “Documentality: A Theory of Social Reality.”Rivista di Estetica57:11-28.
9.
FineK.2001. “The Question of Realism.”Philosophers’ Imprint1:1-30.
10.
GilbertM.1989. On Social Facts. London: Routledge.
11.
GilbertM.2006. A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
GualaF.2010. “Infallibilism and Human Kinds.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences40:244-64.
13.
HackingI.1999. The Social Construction of What?Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14.
HaslangerS.2006. “Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds: What Good Are Our Intuitions?”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society80(Sup. vol.): 89-118.
15.
HayekF. A.1943. “The Facts of the Social Sciences.”Ethics54:1-13.
16.
HudinJ.2010. “Can Status Functions Be Discovered?”The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.
17.
KhalidiM. A.2015. “Three Kinds of Social Kinds.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research90:96-112.
18.
KitcherP.1999. “Race, Ethnicity, Biology, Culture.” In Racism, edited by HarrisL., 87-117. Humanity Books.
19.
MallonR.2007. “A Field Guide to Social Construction.”Philosophy Compass2 (1): 93-108.
20.
PutnamH.1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Mind, Language and Reality; Philosophical Papers Volume2, 215-71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
RubenD.1989. “Realism in the Social Sciences.” In Dismantling Truth, edited by LawsonH.AppignanesiL., 58-75. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
22.
SaulJ.2006. “Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds: What Good Are Our Intuitions?”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society80(Sup. vol.): 119-44.
23.
SchotterA.1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
SearleJ.1990. “Collective Intentions and Actions.” In Intentions in Communication, edited by CohenP.MorganJ.PollackM. E., 401-15. Cambridge: Bradford Books.
25.
SearleJ.1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
26.
SearleJ.2010. Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
SiderT.2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
SmithB.SearleJ.2003. “The Construction of Social Reality: An Exchange.”American Journal of Economics and Sociology62 (1): 283-309.
29.
ThomassonA.2002. “Foundations for a Social Ontology.”ProtoSociology: An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research18-19: 269-90.
30.
ThomassonA.2003. “Realism and Human Kinds.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research68:580-609.
31.
ThomassonA.2009. “Social Entities.” In Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, edited by Le PoidevinR.AndrewM. G.PeterS.CameronR. P., 545–54. London: Routledge.
32.
ToumelaR.1995. The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford Series in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
33.
TuomelaR.2002. The Philosophy of Social Practice: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
