I distinguish two kinds of contribution that have been made by recent minimalist accounts of joint action in philosophy and cognitive science relative to established philosophical accounts of shared intentional action. The “complementarists” seek to analyze a functionally different kind of joint action from the kind of joint action that is analyzed by established philosophical accounts of shared intentional action. The “constitutionalists” seek to expose mechanisms that make performing joint actions possible, without taking a definite stance on which functional characterization of joint action is the appropriate one. I elucidate the contrasting methodological underpinnings of these minimalist research programs in accordance with Bechtel and Richardson’s account of the heuristics of decomposition and localization as a research strategy for the study of complex systems.
ApperlyI.ButterfillS.2009. “Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?”Psychological Review116 (4): 953-70.
2.
AstingtonJ.1991. “Intention in the Child’s Theory of Mind”. In Children’s Theories of Mind: Mental States and Social Understanding, edited by FryeD.MooreC., 157-172. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AstingtonJ.GopnikA.1991. “Developing Understanding of Desire and Intention”. In Natural Theories of the Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, edited by WhitenA., 39-50. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
BacharachM.1999. “Interactive Team Reasoning: A Contribution to the Theory of Cooperation”. Research in Economics53 (2): 117-47.
5.
BaillargeonR.ScottR. M.HeZ.2010. “False Belief Understanding in Infants”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences14 (3): 110-18.
6.
BakerL. R.2007. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BechtelW.2009. “Looking Down, Around and Up: Mechanistic Explanation in Psychology”. Philosophical Psychology22 (5): 543-64.
8.
BechtelW.AbrahamsenA.2005. “Explanation: A Mechanistic Alternative”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences36 (2): 421-41.
9.
BechtelW.RichardsonR.2010. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
BernierE. P.SpelkeE.SkerryA. E.2013. “Core Social Cognition”. In Navigating the Social World: What Infants, Children, and Other Species Can Teach Us, edited by BanajiM. R.GelmanS. A., 11-16. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BlombergO.2011. “Socially Extended Intentions-in-Action”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology2 (2): 335-53.
12.
BlombergO.2014. “Shared Goals and Development”. The Philosophical Quarterly65 (258): 94-101.
13.
BratmanM.1987. Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
BratmanM.1997. “I Intend that We J”. In Contemporary Action Theory, Volume 2: Social Action, edited by TuomelaR.Holmstrom-HintikkaG., 49-63. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16.
BratmanM.1999. Faces of Intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BratmanM.2009. “Modest Sociality and the Distinctiveness of Intention”. Philosophical Studies144 (1): 149-65.
18.
BratmanM.2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW.1996. “Who Is This ‘We’? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71 (1): 83-93.
20.
BrownellC.2011. “Early Developments in Joint Action”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology2 (2): 193-211.
21.
BrownellC.BrownE.1992. “Peers and Play in Infants and Toddlers”. In Handbook of Social Development: A Lifespan Perspective, edited by Van HasseltV.HersenM., 183-200. New York: Plenum Press.
22.
ButterfillS.2012. “Joint Action and Development”. The Philosophical Quarterly62 (246): 23-47.
23.
ButterfillS.SebanzN.2011. “Joint Action: What Is Shared?”Review of Philosophy and Psychology2 (2): 137-46.
24.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A.1999. “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76 (6): 893-910.
25.
ClarkH. H.1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ColmanA.PulfordB.RoseJ.2008a. “Collective Rationality in Interactive Decisions: Evidence for Team Reasoning”. Acta Psychologica128: 387-97.
27.
ColmanA.PulfordB.RoseJ.2008b. “Team Reasoning and Collective Rationality: Piercing the Veil of Obviousness”. Acta Psychologica128: 409-12.
28.
CsibraG.2008. “Goal Attribution to Inanimate Agents by 6.5-Month Old Infants”. Cognition107 (2): 705-17.
29.
GergelyG.NadaskyZ.CsibraG.BiroS.1995. “Taking the Intentional Stance at 12 Months of Age”. Cognition56 (2): 165-93.
30.
GilbertM.2009. “Shared Intention and Personal Intentions”. Philosophical Studies144 (1): 167-87.
31.
GoeblW.PalmerC.2009. “Synchronization of Timing and Motion among Performing Musicians”. Music Perception26 (5): 427-38.
KnoblichG.ButterfillS.SebanzN.2010. “Psychological Research on Joint Action: Theory and Data”. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 51, edited by RossB., 121-54. Burlington: Academic Press.
34.
KovácsA.TéglásE.EndressA. D.2010. “The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others’ Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults”. Science330: 1830-34.
35.
KruegerJ.2008. “Methodological Individualism in Experimental Games: Not So Easily Dismissed”. Acta Psychologica128 (2): 398-401.
36.
MarshK. L.JohnstonL.RichardsonM.SchmidtR. C.2009. “Toward a Radically Embodied, Embedded Social Psychology”. European Journal of Social Psychology39 (7): 1217-25.
37.
MichaelJ.2011. “Shared Emotions and Joint Action”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology2 (2): 355-73.
38.
MollH.TomaselloM.2007. “Cooperation and Human Cognition: The Vygotskian Intelligence Hypothesis”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B362: 639-48.
SchmidtR. C.RichardsonM.2008. “Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination”. In Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social dynamics, edited by FuchsA.JirsaV. K., 281-308. Berlin: Springer.
44.
SearleJ.1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SearleJ.1990. “Collective Intentions and Actions”. In Intentions in Communication, edited by CohenP. R.MorganJ.PollackM., 401-15. Cambridge: MIT Press.
46.
ShockleyK.BakerA. A.RichardsonM. J.FowlerC. A.2007. “Articulatory Constraints on Interpersonal Postural Coordination”. Journal of Experimental Psychology33 (1): 201-208.
ShockleyK.SantanaM. V.FowlerC. A.2003. “Mutual Interpersonal Postural Constraints Are Involved in Cooperative Conversation”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29 (2): 326-32.
49.
SimonH.1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50.
SugdenR.1993. “Thinking as a Team: Towards an Explanation of Nonselfish Behavior”. Social Philosophy & Policy10 (1): 69-89.
51.
SugdenR.2008. “Nash Equilibrium, Team Reasoning and Cognitive Hierarchy Theory”. Acta Psychologica128 (2): 402-404.
52.
SurianL.CaldiS.SperberD.2007. “Attribution of Beliefs by 13-Month-Old Infants”. Psychological Science18 (7): 580-86.
53.
TollefsenD.2005. “Let’s Pretend! Children and Joint Action”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences35 (1): 75-97.
54.
TomaselloM.RakoczyH.2003. “What Makes Human Cognition Unique? From Individual to Shared to Collective Intentionality”. Mind & Language18 (2): 121-47.
55.
TuomelaR.2013. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
van LangeP.2008. “Collective Rationality: The Integrative Model Explains It (As) Well”. Acta Psychologica128 (2): 405-408.
WarnekenF.ChenF.TomaselloM.2006. “Cooperative Activities in Young Children and Chimpanzees”. Child Development77 (3): 640-63.
59.
WarnekenF.GräfenhainM.TomaselloM.2012. “Collaborative Partner or Social Tool? New Evidence for Young Children’s Understanding of Joint Intentions in Collaborative Activities”. Developmental Science15 (1): 54-61.
60.
WarnekenF.TomaselloM.2009. “Varieties of Altruism in Children and Chimpanzees”. Trends in Cognitive Science13 (9): 397-402.
61.
WellmanH.CrossD.WatsonJ.2001. “Meta-analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth about False Belief”. Child Development72 (3): 655-84.
62.
WimmerH.PernerJ.1983. “Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and Constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children’s Understanding of Deception”. Cognition13: 103-28.
63.
WoodwardA. L.1998. “Infants Selectively Encode the Goal Object of an Actor’s Reach”. Cognition69: 1-34.
