Chagnon narrates the ups and downs of his career, how he managed to document the basic ethnography of the Yanomamö of Amazonia, and the loss of scientific compass in American anthropology that brought a good deal of personal villification and the end of his research. The reviewer endorses the view that organized American anthropology is in an intellectually sorry state but argues that Chagnon’s anthropology of anthropology is lacking.
ChagnonNapoleon A.1968. Yanomamo, the Fierce People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
ChagnonNapoleon A.2013. Noble Savages: My Life among Two Dangerous Tribes—The Yanomamö and the Anthropologists. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3.
DregerAlice2011. “Darkness’s Descent on the American Anthropological Association: A Cautionary Tale.” Human Nature22 (3): 225-246.
4.
GregorThomas A.GrossDaniel R.2004. “Guilt by Association: The Culture of Accusation and the American Anthropological Association’s Investigation of ‘Darkness in El Dorado.’”American Anthropologist106 (4): 687-98.
5.
JarvieIan. 2001. “Science in a Democratic Society.”Philosophy of Science68 (December): 545-64.
6.
LewisHerbert S.n.d.“The Radical Transformation of Anthropology.” Article in Senior Anthropologists Association Site, AAA. Accessed April 13, 2014, http://www.aaanet.org/sections/asa/.
7.
MalinowskiBronislaw. 1967. A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
8.
PopperKarl R.1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: George Routledge.
