This article argues that the credibility of both theoretical and empirical models in economics is best understood through their connection with the empirical aspects of the real world. The discussion herein demonstrates that the similarity between the model and the real world is not enough to justify a theoretical model’s explanatory power. The best way to secure the model’s credibility is to prove the existence of representation theorems.
AkerlofGeorge A.1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics84:488-500.
2.
AngristJoshua D.PischkeJörn-Steffen. 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives24 (2): 3-30.
3.
AydinonatN. Emrah. 2007. “Models, Conjectures and Exploration: An Analysis of Schelling’s Checkerboard Model of Residential Segregation.” Journal of Economic Methodology14:429-54.
4.
BanerjeeAbhijit V.1992. “A Simple Model of Herd Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics107:797-817.
5.
BondEric W.1982. “A Direct Test of the ‘Lemons’ Model: The Market for Used Pickup Trucks.” American Economic Review72 (4): 836-40.
6.
CartwrightNancy. 2007a. “Are RCTs the Gold Standard?”Biosocieties2 (1): 11-20.
7.
CartwrightNancy. 2007b. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CartwrightNancy. 2008. “In Praise of the Representation Theorem.” In Representation, Evidence, and Justification: Themes from Suppes, edited by FrauchigerMichaelEsslerWilhelm K.Frankfurt: Ontos.
9.
CartwrightNancy. 2009. “If No Capacities Then No Credible Worlds. But Can Models Reveal Capacities?”Erkenntnis70:45-58.
10.
CartwrightNancy. 2010. “What Are Randomised Controlled Trials Good For?”Philosophical Studies147 (1): 59-70.
11.
CartwrightNancy. 2013. “Will Your Policy Work? Experiments vs. Models.” Paper Presented in The European Network for the Philosophy of the Social Sciences and the Philosophy of Social Science Roundtable First Joint Conference, Ca’Foscari University of Venice, Italy, September 3.
12.
CartwrightNancyHardieJeremy. 2012. Evidence Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChaoHsiang-Ke. 2009. Representation and Structure in Economics: The Methodology of Econometric Models of the Consumption Function. London: Routledge.
FriedmanMichael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
16.
FriedmanMichael. 2009. “Einstein, Kant, and the Relativized a Priori.” In Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics, edited by BitbolMichelKerszbergPierrePetitotJean, 253-67. Dordrecht: Springer.
17.
GenesoveDavid. 1993. “Adverse Selection in the Wholesale Used Car Market.” Journal of Political Economy101 (4): 644-65.
18.
GibbonsRobertKatzLawrence F.1991. “Layoffs and Lemons.” Journal of Labor Economics9 (4): 351-80.
19.
GiereRonald N.1985. “Constructive Realism.” In Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with Reply from Bas van Fraassen, edited by ChurchlandPaul M.HookerClifford A., 75-98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
GiereRonald N.1988. Explaining Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
21.
GiereRonald N.2006. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GiereRonald N.2009. “Why Scientific Models Should Not Be Regarded as Works of Fiction.” In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, edited by SuárezMauricio, 248-58. New York: Routledge.
23.
GrangerClive W. J.1999. Empirical Modeling in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Grüne-YanoffTill. 2009. “Learning from Minimal Economic Models.” Erkenntnis70:81-99.
25.
HausmanDaniel M.1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HeckmanJames J.2000. “Causal Parameters and Policy Analysis in Economics: A Twentieth Century Retrospective.” Quarterly Journal of Economics115 (1): 45-97.
27.
HendryDavid F.2011. “Empirical Economic Model Discovery and Theory Evaluation.” Rationality, Markets and Morals2:115-45.
28.
KeaneMichael P.2010. “Structural vs. Atheoretic Approaches to Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics156 (1): 3-20.
29.
KnuuttilaTarja. 2009. “Isolating Representations versus Credible Constructions? Economic Modelling in Theory and Practice.” Erkenntnis70:59-80.
30.
KrantzDavid H.LuceDuncan R.SuppesPatrickTverskyAmos. 1971. Foundations of Measurement. Vol. 1: Additive and Polynomial Representations. New York: Academic Press.
LuceR. DuncanKrantzDavid H.SuppesPatrickTverskyAmos. 1990. Foundations of Measurement. Vol. 3: Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance. CA: Academic Press.
33.
MilgromPaul R.1981. “Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications.” The Bell Journal of Economics12 (2): 380-91.
34.
MorganMary S.1988. “Finding a Satisfactory Empirical Model.” In The Popperian Legacy in Economics, edited by de MarchiNeil, 199-221. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
PrattMichael D.HofferGeorge E.1984. “Test of the Lemons Model: Comment.” American Economic Review74 (4): 798-800.
36.
RuoffGabrieleSchneiderGerald. 2006. “Segregation in the Classroom: An Empirical Test of the Schelling Model.” Rationality and Society18 (1): 95-117.
37.
SchellingThomas C.1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
38.
SchellingThomas C.1998. “Social Mechanisms and Social Dynamics.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard, 34-44. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SimsChristopher A.1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica48 (1): 1-48.
40.
SteelDaniel. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
SugdenRobert. 2000. “Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology7 (1): 1-31.
42.
SugdenRobert. 2009. “Credible Worlds, Capacities and Mechanisms.” Erkenntnis70:3-27.
43.
SuppesPatrick. 1960. “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences.” Synthese12:287-301. Reprinted in Suppes, Patrick. 1969. Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science: Selected Papers from 1951 to 1969. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 10-23.
44.
SuppesPatrick. 1962. “Models of Data.” In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, edited by NagelErnestSuppesPatrickTarskiAlfred, 252-61. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45.
SuppesPatrick. 1967. “What is a Scientific Theory.” In Philosophy of Science Today, edited by MorgenbesserSidney, 55-67. New York: Basic Book.
46.
SuppesPatrick. 2002. Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
47.
SuppesPatrickKrantzDavid H.LuceR. DuncanTverskyAmos. 1989. Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 2: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations. San Diego: Academic Press.
48.
van FraassenBas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
van FraassenBas. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
ZhangJunfu. 2009. “Tipping and Residential Segregation: A Unified Schelling Model.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 4413.
