Martin Paleček and Mark Risjord have recently put forward a critical evaluation of the ontological turn in anthropological theory. According to this philosophically informed theory of ethnographic practice, certain insights of twentieth-century analytic philosophy should play a part in the methodological debates concerning anthropological fieldwork: most importantly, the denial of representationalism and the acceptance of the extended mind thesis. In this paper, I will attempt to evaluate the advantages and potential drawbacks of ontological anthropology—arguing that to become a true alternative to current social scientific thinking about methodology, it has to meet certain philosophical objections.
AdamsFrederickAizawaKenneth. 2010. The Bounds of Cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
ClarkAndy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
ClarkAndy. 2010. “Memento’s Revenge: The Extended Mind, Extended.” In The Extended Mind, edited by MenaryR., 43-66. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
4.
ClarkAndyChalmersDavid. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis58 (1): 7-19.
5.
DamasioAntonio M.2008. Descartes’ Error. New York: Random House.
6.
DavidsonArnold. 1990. “Closing Up the Corpses.” In Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, edited by BoolosG., 295-326. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
DavidsonDonald. 1984. “What Metaphors Mean.” In Inquiries into Truth & Interpretation, 245-64. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8.
DemeterTamás. 2013. “Mental Fictionalism: The Very Idea.” The Monist96 (4): 483-504.
9.
DennettDaniel C.1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
10.
DennettDaniel C.1991. “Real Patterns.” The Journal of Philosophy87:27-51.
11.
FoucaultMichel. 1994. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. New York: Random House.
12.
FoucaultMichel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
13.
GeertzClifford. 1979. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” In The Interpretive Turn: Emergence of an Approach, edited by RabinowP.SullivanW. M., 181-224. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
GiereRonald N.2006. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
HackingIan. 1986. “Making Up People.” In Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, edited by HellerT. C.WellberyD. E.SosnaM., 222-37. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16.
HackingIan. 1995. Rewriting the Soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HollisMartin. 1970. “The Limits of Irrationality.” In Rationality, edited by WilsonB., 214-220. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
19.
Leach, Edmund. 1983. Social Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Lévi-StraussClaude. 1961. Tristes Tropiques. New York: Criterion Books.
21.
MillikanRuth G.2005. Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
PalečekMartinRisjordMark. 2013. “Relativism and the Ontological Turn in Anthropology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences43 (1): 3-23.
23.
PleasantsNigel. 2000. “Winch and Wittgenstein on Understanding Ourselves Critically: Descriptive not Metaphysical.” Inquiry43:289-318.
24.
RyleGilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
SearleJohn R.1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SearleJohn R.1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
27.
SearleJohn R.2010. Making the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
SprevakMark. 2009. “Extended Cognition and Functionalism.” The Journal of Philosophy106 (9): 503-27.
29.
Viverios de CastroEduardo. 2012. “Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere.” HAU Masterclass Series1:45-168.
30.
WinchPeter. 1964. “Understanding a Primitive Society.” American Philosophy Quarterly 1:307-24; reprinted in Rationality, edited by WilsonB., 78-111. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
WinchPeter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.
