Dorothy Emmet, in two books, one of which was based on extensive personal contact with Robert Merton and Columbia sociology, provides the closest thing we have to an authorized philosophical defense of Merton. It features a deflationary account of functionalism which dispenses with the idea of general teleological ends. What it replaces it with is an account of “structures” that have various consequences and that are maintained because, on Emmet’s account, of the mutual reinforcement of motives produced by the structure.
BlackMax. 1961. The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
2.
BlauPeter M.1975. Approaches to the Study of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
3.
BlauPeter M.1990. “Structural Constraints and Opportunities: Merton’s Contribution to General Theory.” In Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy, edited by ClarkJonModgilCeliaModgilSohan, 141-55. London: Falmer Press.
4.
BoudonRaymond. 1990. “Boudon Replies to Elster.” In Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy, edited by ClarkJonModgilCeliaModgilSohan, 136-37. London: Falmer Press.
5.
CohenGerald A.(1978) 2000. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
ColeStephen. 2004. “Merton’s Contribution to the Sociology of Science.” Social Studies of Science34 (6): 829-44.
7.
CrothersCharles. 1987. Robert K. Merton, Key Sociologists Series. London: Ellis Harwood and Tavistock Publications.
8.
DonaldsonLex. 1985. In Defence of Organization Theory: A Reply to the Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ElsterJon. 1990. “Merton’s Functionalism and the Unintended Consequences of Action.” In Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy, edited by ClarkJonModgilCeliaModgilSohan, 129-35. London: Falmer Press.
10.
EmmetDorothy. 1958. Function, Purpose, and Powers: Some Concepts in the Study of Individuals and Societies. London: Macmillan.
11.
EmmetDorothy. 1966. Rules, Roles, and Relations. London: Macmillan.
12.
EmmetDorothy. 1996. Philosophers and Friends: Reminiscences of Seventy Years in Philosophy. London: Macmillan.
13.
HaneyDavid P.2008. The Americanization of Social Science: Intellectuals and Public Responsibility in the Postwar United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
HempelCarl. (1959) 1965. “The Logic of Functional Analysis.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation: And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 297-496. New York: Free Press.
15.
MertonRobert. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review1:894-904.
16.
MertonRobert. 1941. “Review of Contemporary Social Theory, by BarnesHarry ElmerBeckerHowardBeckerFrances Bennett.” American Sociological Review6 (2): 282-86.
17.
MertonRobert. 1958. “The Functions of the Professional Association.” American Journal of Nursing58 (1): 50-54.
18.
MertonRobert. (1957) 1968. “Manifest and Latent Functions.” In Social Theory and Social Structure, 73-138. Enlarged ed.New York: Free Press.
19.
MertonRobert. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by StorerN. W.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
MertonRobert. 1975. “Structural Analysis in Sociology.” In Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, edited by BlauPeter M., 21-52. New York: Free Press.
21.
NagelErnest. 1956. “A Formalization of Functionalism.” In Logic without Metaphysics, 247-83. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
22.
ParsonsTalcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
23.
ParsonsTalcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
