In response to Hansson Wahlberg, this paper argues, first, that he misunderstands the redescription principle developed in my book The Causal Power of Social Structures, and second, that his criticisms rest on an ontological individualism that is taken for granted but in fact lacks an adequate ontological justification of its own.
Elder-VassDave. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Elder-VassDave. 2014. “Social Entities and the Basis of Their Powers.” In Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, edited by ZahleJ.ColinF., 39-53. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
5.
Gell-MannMurray. 1995. The Quark and the Jaguar. London: Abacus.
6.
Hansson WahlbergTobias. 2014. “Elder-Vass on the Causal Power of Social Structures.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences44 (6):774-91.
7.
HodgsonGeoffrey M. 2007. “Meanings of Methodological Individualism.” Journal of Economic Methodology14 (2):211-26.
8.
StephanAchim. 2002. “Emergentism, Irreducibility, and Downward Causation.”Grazer Philosophische Studien65 (1):77-94.
9.
TsilipakosLeonidas. 2014. “Theoretical Procedures and Elder-Vass’s Critical Realist Ontology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences44 (6):752-73.
10.
WimsattWilliam C.2006. “Reductionism and Its Heuristics: Making Methodological Reductionism Honest.” Synthese151 (3):445-75.
11.
ZahleJulie. 2014. “Holism, Emergence, and the Crucial Distinction.” In Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, edited by ZahleJ.CollinF., 1-19. Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Springer.
