Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Why would anyone want there to be natural foundations for the social sciences? In a provocative essay exploring precisely that question, historian Chris Renwick uses an interwar debate featuring William Beveridge, Lancelot Hogben, and Friedrich Hayek to begin to imagine what might have been had such a program calling for biological knowledge to form the natural bases of the social sciences been realized at the London School of Economics. Yet perhaps Renwick grants too much attention to differences and “what-ifs” and not enough to the historical question of “what happened” afterward. “Chickens and Eggs” offers an alternative view of this rather vexed question—one grounded in what happened, which suggests that Renwick’s concerns may be somewhat misplaced.

Keywords

William Beveridge counterfactual history eugenics Friedrich Hayek presentism social Darwinism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Evans

R. J.

1997. In Defence of History. London: Granta Books.

Forman

2012. “Production and Curation: Modernity Entailed Disciplinarity, Postmodernity Entails Antidisciplinarity.” Osiris 27, no. 1: 56-97.

Fukuyama

2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

Herman

1995. The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts, 1940-1970. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Igo

S. E.

2007. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Judt

2010. Ill Fares the Land. London: Penguin Books.

Lessing

1962. The Golden Notebook. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Lyotard

J.-F.

1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Polanyi

1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10.

Renwick

2009. “The Practice of Spencerian Science: Patrick Geddes’s Biosocial Program, 1876-1889.” Isis 100, no. 1: 36-57.

11.

Renwick

2012. British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Richards

R. J.

1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Winch

1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. New York: Humanities Press.

14.

Wolin

S. S.

2008. Democracy Inc.: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.