Bartley’s pancritical rationalism is seen by some as being a refinement of Popper’s critical rationalism. I contest this view and argue that pancritical rationalism is obtained from critical rationalism by removing some of its most important and useful features. The remainder consists of a restatement of some of Popper’s key ideas and an interpretation of others that I attempt to show is not entirely faithful to what Popper says.
ArtigasM.1999. The ethical nature of Karl Popper’s theory of knowledge. Berne: Peter Lang.
2.
BartleyW. W.III. 1964. The retreat to commitment. London: Chatto & Windus.
3.
BartleyW. W.III. 1982. Critical study: The philosophy of Karl Popper. Part III: Rationality, criticism, and logic. Philosophia11:121–221.
4.
BartleyW. W.III. 1984. The retreat to commitment. 2nd ed.La Salle, IL: Open Court.
5.
BartleyW. W.III. 1990. Unfathomed knowledge, unmeasured wealth. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
6.
CollingwoodR. G.1940. An essay on metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
DillerA.2003. Retransmittability and empirical propositions. In Proceedings of the fifth conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, edited by van EemerenF. H.BlairJ. A.WillardC. A.HenkemansA. F., 243–47. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
8.
DillerA.2006. Constructing a comprehensively anti-justificationist position. In Karl Popper: A centenary assessment, edited by JarvieI.MilfordK.MillerD., 2:119–29. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
9.
DillerA.2007. Understanding the strategy of attacking premises. In Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, edited by van EemerenF. H.BlairJ. A.WillardC. A.GarssenB., 1:331–35. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
10.
DillerA.2008. Testimony from a Popperian perspective. Philosophy of the Social Sciences38:419–56.
11.
FeyerabendP. K.1995. Killing time. London: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GadenneV.2006. Methodological rules, rationality, and truth. In Rationality and reality, edited by CheyneC.WorrallJ., 97–107. Dordrecht: Springer.
13.
HarmanG.1986. Change in view: Principles of reasoning. London: MIT Press.
14.
JarvieI. C.2001. The republic of science. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
15.
JohanssonI.1975. A critique of Karl Popper’s methodology. Stockholm: Scandinavian University Books.
16.
MahoneyM. J.1976. Scientist as subject. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
17.
MautnerT., ed. 1996. A dictionary of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
MillerD.1994. Critical rationalism: A restatement and defence. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
19.
MonkR.1996. Bertrand Russell: The spirit of solitude. London: Jonathan Cape.
20.
MusgraveA.2007. Critical rationalism. In The power of argumentation
, edited by Suárez-IñiguezE., 171–211. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
21.
PopperK. R.1945. The open society and its enemies. Vol. 2. London: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
22.
PopperK. R.1957. The open society and its enemies. Vol. 2. 3rd ed.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
23.
PopperK. R.[1959] 1975. The logic of scientific discovery. 8th impression. London: Hutchinson.
24.
PopperK. R.[1963] 1974. Conjectures and refutations. 5th ed.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25.
PopperK. R.1966a. The open society and its enemies. Vol. 1. 5th ed.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
PopperK. R.1966b. The open society and its enemies. Vol. 2. 5th ed.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
PopperK. R.1975. Objective knowledge. London: Oxford University Press.
28.
PopperK. R.1983. Realism and the aim of science. London: Routledge.
29.
PopperK. R.1992a. In search of a better world. London: Routledge.
