Thought experimental methods play a central role in empirical moral psychology. Against the increasingly common interpretation of recent experimental data, I argue that such methods cannot demonstrate that moral intuitions are produced by reflexive computations that are implicit, fast, and largely automatic. I demonstrate, in contrast, that evaluating thought experiments occurs at a near-glacial pace relative to the speed at which reflexive information processing occurs in a human brain. So, these methods allow for more reflective and deliberative processing than has commonly been assumed. However, these methods may still provide insight into some human strategies for navigating unfamiliar moral dilemmas.
Annas, J.2005. Comments on John Doris’ lack of character . Philosophy and Phenomenological Research73:636-47.
2.
Baldwin, D., J. Baird, M. Saylor, and M. Clark.2001. Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development72:708-17.
3.
Banerjee, K., B. Huebner, and M. Hauser. Forthcoming. Intuitive moral judgments are robust across demographic variation in gender, education, politics, and religion: A large-scale web-based study. Journal of Cognition and Culture.
4.
Bargh, J., and T. Chartrand.1999. The unbearable automaticity of being . American Psychologist54:462-79.
5.
Brosnan, S., and F. de Waal.2003. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature425:297-99.
6.
Brosnan, S., H. Schiff, and F. de Waal.2005. Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B1560:253-58.
7.
Call, J., B. Hare, M. Carpenter, and M. Tomasello.2004. "Unwilling" versus "unable": Chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action. Developmental Science7:488-98.
8.
Carruthers, P.2009. An architecture for dual reasoning. In Two Minds: Dual processes and beyond, edited by J. Evans and K. Frankish.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Cheney, D., and R. Seyfarth.2007. Baboon metaphysics: The evolution of a social mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Cummins, R.1983. The nature of psychological explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Cushman, F., J. Greene, and L. Young. Forthcoming. Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In Oxford handbook of moral psychology.
12.
Cushman, F., L. Young, and M. Hauser.2006. The role of reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science17.
Dennett, D.1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
15.
Dennett, D.1992. Consciousness explained. New York: Penguin.
16.
Doris, J.2002. Lack of character. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Doris, J. Forthcoming. A natural history of the self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
Doris, J., and S. Stich.2006. Moral psychology: Empirical approaches . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-psych-emp/. Accessed 4 November 2010.
19.
Dwyer, S.1999. Moral competence. In Philosophy and linguistics , edited by K. Murasugi and R. Stainton.Boulder, CO: Westvew Press.
20.
Dwyer, S., B. Huebner, and M. Hauser.2010. The linguistic analogy: Motivations, results, and speculations. Topics in Cognitive Science2 (3): 486-510.
21.
Faucher, L., and E. Machery.2009. Racism: Against Jorge Garcia’s moral and psychological monism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences39:41-62.
22.
Fauconnier, G., and E. Sweetser.1996. Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner.1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science22 (2): 133-87.
24.
Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner.2003. The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Frederick, S.2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives19:25-42.
26.
Gendler, T.2007. Philosophical thought experiments, intuitions, and cognitive equilibrium. Midwest Studies in Philosophy31:68-89.
27.
Greene, J.2007. Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Science11:322-23.
28.
Greene, J., F. Cushman, K. Lowenberg, L. Nystrom, and J. Cohen.2009. Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition111:364-71.
29.
Greene, J., and J. Haidt.2002. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Science6:517-523.
30.
Greene, J., L. Nystrom, A. Engell, J. Darley, and J. Cohen.2004. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron44:389-400.
31.
Greene, J., R. Sommerville, L. Nystrom, J. Darley, and J. Cohen.2001. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science293:2105-08.
32.
Haidt, J.1993. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65:613-28.
33.
Haidt, J.2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail. Psychological Review108: 814-34.
34.
Haidt, J., and F. Bjorklund.2008. Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality-Intuition and diversity, vol. 2, edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Haidt, J., F. Bjorklund, and S. Murphy.n.d. Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason . University of Virginia.
36.
Haidt, J., and M. Hersh.2001. Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology31:191-221.
37.
Haidt, J., and S. Kesebir.2010. Morality. In Handbook of social psychology, edited by S. Fiske , D. Gilbert and L. Gardner.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley .
38.
Haney, C., W. Banks, and P. Zimbardo.1973. A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Naval Research Review30:4-17.
39.
Harris, P., and M. Núñez .1996. Children’s understanding of permission rules. Child Development67:1572-91.
40.
Haslam, N.2006. Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology10 (3): 252-64.
41.
Haslam, N., Y. Kashima, S. Loughnan, J. Shi, and C. Suitner.2008. Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans and nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition26:248-58.
42.
Hauser, M.2008. The seeds of humanity. Paper presented at The Tanner Lectures of Human Value. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
43.
Hauser, M., M. Chen, F. Chen, and E. Chuang.2003. Give unto others: Genetically unrelated cotton-top Tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , Series B270:2363-70.
44.
Hauser, M., F. Tonnaer, and M. Cima.2009. When moral intuitions are immune to the law: A case study of euthanasia and the act-omission distinction in the Nederlands. Journal of Cognition and Culture9:149-69.
45.
Hauser, M., L. Young, and F. Cushman.2007. Reviving Rawl’s linguistic analogy . In Moral Psychology, vol. 1: The evolution of morality, edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
46.
Hollos, M., P. Leis, and E. Turiel.1986. Social reasoning in Ijo children and adolescents in Nigerian communities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology17:352-76.
47.
Huebner, B., S. Dwyer, and M. Hauser.2009. The role of emotion in moral psychology . Trends in Cognitive Science13 (1): 1-6.
48.
Huebner, B., M. Hauser, and P. Pettit. Forthcoming. When are intentional, means based harms morally permissible?Mind and Language.
49.
Huebner, B., J. Lee, and M. Hauser.2010. The moral-conventional distinction in mature moral competence. Journal of cognition and culture10 (1-2): 1-26.
50.
Hume, D.1978. A treatise of human nature. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
Jackendoff, R.2007a. Language, consciousness, culture: Essays on mental structure (Jean Nicod Lectures). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Jackendoff, R.2007b. Linguistics in cognitive science: The state of the art . The Linguistic Review24:347-401.
53.
Kamtekar, R.2004. Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character . Ethics114:458-91.
54.
Kinzler, K., E. Dupoux, and E. Spelke.2007. The native language of social cognition . PNAS104:12577-580.
55.
Koenigs, M., L. Young, R. Adolphs, D. Tranel, F. Cushman, M. Hauser, and A. Damasio.2007. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature446:908-11.
56.
Leslie, A., J. Knobe, and A. Cohen.1996. Intentionally and the side-effect effect: "Theory of mind" and moral judgment. Psychological Science17:421-27.
57.
Mikhail, J.2007. Universal moral grammar. Trends in Cognitive Science11:143-52.
58.
Mikhail, J.2008a. Moral cognition and computational theory. In Moral psychology: The neuroscience of morality-Emotion, disease, and development , edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong.Cambridge, MA: MIT PRESS.
59.
Mikhail, J.2008b. The poverty of the moral stimulus. In Moral psychology: The evolution of morality, edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
Mikhail, J. Forthcoming (a). Elements of moral cognition: Rawls’ linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Mikhail, J. Forthcoming (b). Is the prohibition of homicide universal? Evidence from comparative criminal law. Brooklyn Law Review497.
62.
Milgram, S., and J. Sabini.1978. On maintaining urban norms: A field experiment in the subway. In Advances in environmental psychology , edited by A. Baum, J. Singer, and S. Valins.New York: Erlbaum.
63.
Nichols, S.2004. Sentimental rules: On the natural foundation of moral judgment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
Nietzsche, F. [ 1887] 1998. On the genealogy of morality: A polemic , translated by A. J. Swensen and M. Clark. Indianapolis : Hackett Publishing.
65.
Nisan, M.1987. Moral norms and social conventions: A cross-cultural comparison . Developmental Psychology23:719-25.
66.
Nosek, B., M. Banaji, and A. Greenwald.2002. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics6 (1): 101-15.
67.
Nucci, L., and E. Turiel.1993. God’s word, religious rules, and their relation to Christian and Jewish children’s concepts of morality . Child Development64:1475-91.
68.
Nucci, L., E. Turiel, and G. Encarnacion-Gawrych .1983. Children’s social interactions and social concepts in the Virgin Islands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology14:469-87.
69.
Paxton, J., and J. Greene. Forthcoming. Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations. TopICS.
70.
Prinz, J.2009. The emotional construction of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
Range, F., L. Horna, Z. Viranyi, and L. Hubera.2009. The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. PNAS106:340-45.
72.
Schnall, S., J. Haidt, G. Clore, and A. Jordan.2008. Disgust as embodied moral judgment . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34:1096-109.
73.
Scholl, B.2008. Two kinds of experimental philosophy, and their methodological dangers. Paper presented at the SPP Workshop on Experimental Philosophy. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
74.
Smetana, J., and J. Braeges.1990. The development of toddlers’ moral and conventional judgments. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly36:329-46.
75.
Smith, A.1759. The theory of moral sentiments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Strawson, P.1963. Freedom and resentment. In Perspectives on moral responsibility, edited by J. Fischer and M. Ravizza.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
77.
Talbot, B.2010. The irrelevance of folk intuitions to the "hard problem" of consciousness. Paper presented at the Second Annual Online Consciousness Conference. http://consciousnessonline.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/the-irrelevance-of-folk-intuitions-to-the-%E2%80%98hard-problem%E2%80%99-of-consciousness/ . Accessed 4 November 2010.
78.
Turiel, E.1983. The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79.
Valdesolo, P., and D. DeSteno.2006. Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science17:476-77.
80.
Valian, V.1999. Why so slow. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81.
Wegner, D.2002. The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82.
Wegner, D., and D. Gilbert.2000. Social psychology-The science of human experience. In Subjective experience in social cognition and behavior, edited by H. Bless and J. Forgas.Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
83.
Wheatley, T., and J. Haidt.2005. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science16:780-84.
