This essay offers a critical introduction to the intellectual issues involved in the Kitzmiller case relating to intelligent design, and to Steve Fuller’s involvement in it. It offers a brief appraisal of the intelligent design movement stemming from the work of Phillip E. Johnson, and of Steve Fuller’s case for intelligent design in a rather different sense.
Behe, M.2001. Reply to my critics. Biology and Philosophy16 (5): 683-70.
2.
Behe, M.2006. From muttering to mayhem: How Phillip Johnson got me moving . In Darwin’s nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the intelligent design movement, edited by W. Dembski.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
3.
Bland, K.P.2009. Review of The fall of man and the foundations of science, by P. Harrison. Journal of the American Academy of Religion77 (1): 148-51.
4.
Braithwaite, R.B.1955. An empiricist’s view of the nature of religious belief. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
D’Agostino, M.2006. In the matter of Berkeley v. Berkeley. Berkeley Science Review (Spring): 31-35.
6.
Dembski, W. A., ed. 2006. Darwin’s Nemesis: Phillip Johnson and the intelligent design movement. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
7.
Dembski, W.A.2009. The end of Christianity: Finding a good god in an evil world. Nashville, TN: B&H Academic .
8.
Denton, M.1986. Evolution: A theory in crisis. Bethesda , MD: Adler & Adler.
9.
Fales, E.2006. Dover judge makes the right ruling using the wrong premise: Commentary. Science & Theology News. March 10.
10.
Fitelson, B., C. Stephens, and E. Sober.1999. How not to detect design: A review of The design inference: Eliminating chance through small probabilities by William A. Dembski. Philosophy of Science66:472-88.
11.
Forrest, B., and P. Gross [ 2004] 2007. Creationism’s Trojan horse. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Fuller, S.1985. Bounded rationality in law and science. Unpublished PhD diss. University of Pittsburgh.
13.
Fuller, S.1988. Social epistemology. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
14.
Fuller, S.2006. New sociological imagination. London : SAGE.
15.
Fuller, S.2007. Science vs. religion, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
16.
Fuller, S.2008. Dissent over descent. Cambridge, UK: Icon.
17.
Gaukroger, S.2009. Review of The fall of man and the foundations of science by Peter Harrison. British Journal for the History of Science42:294-96.
18.
Goodstein, L.2005. Intelligent design might be meeting its maker. New York Times December 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/weekinreview/04good.html?_r=1 .
19.
Gould, S.J.1998. Non-overlapping magisteria. In Leonardo’s mountain of clams and the diet of worms, by S. J. Gould. New York: Harmony.
20.
Grant, E.2009. The fall and foundations. Metascience18 (1): 43-51.
21.
Harrison, P.2001. The Bible, Protestantism, and the rise of natural science . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Harrison, P.2007. The fall of man and the foundations of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Hart, D.G.1994. Defending the faith. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Johnson, P.E.1991. Darwin on trial. Washington, DC: Regnery.
25.
Hooykaas, R.1972. Religion and the rise of modern science. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
26.
Hughes, L. R., ed. Reviews of creationist books. Oakland, CA: National Center for Science Education.
27.
Hull, D.L.1991. The god of the Galápagos: Review of Darwin on Trial by Phillip Johnson. Nature. August 8.
28.
Jay, S.1999. Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine Books .
29.
Lambert, K.2006. Fuller’s folly, Kuhnian paradigms, and intelligent design. Social Studies of Science36:835-42.
30.
Machen, J.G.1946. Christianity and liberalism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
31.
Marx, K.1843. Letters from the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher; M. to R. (Marx to Ruge). Kreuznach. September. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/letters/43_09.htm .
32.
McHenry, L. ed. 2009. Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
33.
Meyer, S.2002. Teach the controversy. http://www.discovery.org/a/1134 .
34.
Miller, K.2008. Only a theory: Evolution and the battle for America’s soul. New York: Penguin.
35.
Monton, B.2009. Finding God in science. Guelph, Ontario: Broadview.
36.
National Academy of Sciences.1984. Science and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37.
Pennock, R.2001. Naturalism, evidence, and creationism. In Intelligent design, creationism and its critics, edited by R. Pennock.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Pennock, R.2009. Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?Synthese. http://www.springerlink.com/content/k305581557n60r31/?p=742bc9493aaf4d8688ee429a220e1258&pi=0.
39.
Peshkin, A.1986. God’s choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Rivers, I., and D. L. Wykes, eds. 2008. Joseph Priestley, scientist, philosopher, and theologian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
Sandler, L.2007. Righteous. New York: Viking Penguin.
42.
Schofield, R.E.1997. The enlightenment of Joseph Priestley: A study of his life and work from 1733 to 1773. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
43.
Schofield, R.E.2004. The enlightened Joseph Priestley: A study of his life and work from 1773 to 1804. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
44.
Scott, E.C.1993. Darwin prosecuted: Review of Johnson’s Darwin on Trial. Creation Evolution Journal13:36-47.
45.
Snobelin, S.D.1999. Isaac Newton, heretic: The strategies of a Nicodemite . British Journal for the History of Science32:381-419.
46.
Stewart, L.1996. Seeing through the scholium. History of Science34:123-65.
47.
Wexler, J.2006. Kitzmiller and the "Is it science?" question. First Amendment Law Review5:90-111.
