This Companion to the philosophy of science reflects fairly well the gloomy state of affairs in this subfield at its best—concerns, problems, prejudices, and all. The field is still stuck with the problem of justification of science, refusing to admit that there is neither need nor possibility to justify science and forbid dissent from it.
Agassi, Joseph.1975. Science in flux. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
2.
Agassi, Joseph.1977. Towards a rational philosophical anthropology. The Hague, the Netherlands: Nijhoff.
3.
Agassi, Joseph.1985. Technology: Philosophical and social aspects. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
4.
Agassi, Joseph.1986. A note on Smith’s term "Naturalism." Hume Studies 12:92-98. (Reprinted in Stanley Twyman, ed., David Hume: Critical Assessments, vol. 3, London: Routledge, 1994)
5.
Agassi, Joseph.1989. The logic of consensus and of extremes. In Freedom and rationality: Essays in honour of John Watkins, edited by F. D’Agostino and I. C. Jarvie, 3-21. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science , vol. 117. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
6.
Bar-Am, Nimrod.2008. Extensionalism: The revolution in logic. Berlin: Springer.
7.
Carnap, Rudolf.1928/1998. Die Logische Aufbau der Welt. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner Verlag.
8.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: Chicago university Press.
9.
Creath, Richard, and Michael Friedman .2007. The Cambridge companion to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Eddington, Arthur Stanley.1928. The nature of the physical world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Edmond, Gary, and David Mercer.2004. The Invisible branch: The authority of science studies in expert evidence jurisprudence. In Expertise in regulation and law, edited by Gary Edmond, 197-242. Farnham , Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
12.
Hahn, L.E., and P.A. Schilpp.1986. The philosophy of W. V. Quine. Peru, IL: Open Court.
13.
Kolmogoroff, Andrey, 1933. Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin: Julius Springer; 1956. Foundations of the Theory of Probability, 2nd ed. New York: Chelsea.
14.
Laudan, Larry.1983. The demise of the demarcation problem. In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum , edited by Robert S. Cohen and Larry Laudan, 111-27. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel. (Reprinted in Michael Ruse, But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988 ; and Larry Laudan, Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996)
15.
Leblanc, Hugues1989. The Autonomy of Probability Theory (Notes on Kolmogorov, Rényi, and Popper). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science40 (2):167-181.
16.
Musgrave, Alan.1995. Realism and idealization (metaphysical objections to scientific realism). In The problem of rationality in science and its philosophy: on Popper vs. Polanyi, the Polish conferences, 1988-89, edited by Józef Misiek, 143-66. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 160. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
17.
Popper, Karl R.1935/1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
18.
Popper, Karl R.1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
19.
Popper, Karl R., 1955. Two Autonomous Axiom Systems for the Calculus of Probabilities . British Journal for the Philosophy of Science6 (21):51-57.
20.
Popper, Karl R.1963. Conjectures and refutations. London : Routledge.
21.
Rényi, Alfréd, 1955. On a new axiomatic theory of probability. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae6, 285-335.
22.
Rosenberg, Jay F.2007. Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the images. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Russell, Bertrand.1912. The problems of philosophy. London : Williams and Norgate and many later editions.
24.
Russell, Bertrand.1940. An Inquiry into meaning and truth. London: Allen & Unwin. (Pelican ed., 1962)
25.
Schilpp, Paul Arthur.1944. The philosophy of Bertrand Russell. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
26.
Watkins, John.1957-1958. Epistemology and politics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society58:144-55.
