Some psychologists have recently tried to develop new approaches to psychology incompatible with both natural-science views of the discipline and basic tenets of postmodernism. In her new book on psychology’s interpretative turn, Barbara Held refers to these thinkers as “middleground theorists” or MGTs. Most of the MGTs reject psychological laws, defend free choice and agency, stress the role of values in psychological inquiry, and argue for a hermeneutical methodology. Some reject scientific realism and embrace epistemological relativism. Both Held and I express doubts about some of these views.
Erwin, E.2009b. Psychoanalytic research methods. In Philosophy of religion, physics, and psychology: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum , edited by A. Jokic.New York: Prometheus Books.
7.
Fishman, D.2006. Round 4A: Not a knock-out punch, but rather a call for pluralism. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy2, Article 6. http://pscp.libraries.rutgers.edu/include/getdoc.php?id=527&article=90&m.
8.
Freud, S.1907. Obsessive actions and religious practices: 1953-1974. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, edited by J. Strachey.London: Hogarth Press.
9.
Gergen, K.1994. Toward transformation in social knowledge. London: SAGE.
10.
Guignon, C.1998. Narrative explanation in psychology. American Behavioral Scientist41:558-77.
11.
Held, B.1995. Back to reality: A critique of postmodern theory in psychotherapy . New York: W. W. Norton.
12.
Held, B.2007. Psychology’s interpretative turn: The search for truth and agency in theoretical and philosophical psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
13.
Kincaid, H.1996. Philosophical foundations of the social sciences: Analyzing controversies in social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Martin, J., and J. Sugarman.1999. The psychology of human possibility and constraint. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Martin, J., J. Sugarman, and J. Thompson.2003. Psychology and the question of agency . Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
McIntyre, L.1996. Laws and explanations in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: West-view Press.
17.
Pols, E.1992. Radical realism: Direct knowing in science and philosophy . Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
18.
Pols, E.1998. Minds regained. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
19.
Pols, E.2002. The psychologist as rational agent. Bulletin fra Forum for Antropologisk Psykologi11:92-96.
20.
Richardson, F., B. Fowers, and C. Guignon.1999. Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Slife, B., and R. Williams.1995. What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
Slife, B., C. Yanchar, and J. Reber.2005. Introduction: Thinking critically about critical thinking. In Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives, edited by B. Slife, J. Reber, and F. Richardson, 3-14. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 3-14.
23.
Taylor, C.1985. Interpretation and the sciences of man. In Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2, edited by C. Taylor.New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Williams, R.2005. The language and methods of science: Common assumptions and uncommon conclusions. In Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives, edited by B. Slife, J. Reber , and F. Richardson.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
25.
Wundt, W.1912. An introduction to psychology. Translated by R. Pintner . London: George Allen & Company .
