The word critical has become an honorific title used by researchers to commend their work, or the particular approach they adopt. Conversely, the work of others is often dismissed on the grounds that it is “uncritical”. However, there are important questions about what the term critical means, about what we should be critical of, and about the form that criticism ought to take. These questions are addressed here in relation to both the role of the social researcher itself and that of researchers operating as public intellectuals. It is argued that the distinction between these roles is an important one, and has implications for what can legitimately be criticised, on what grounds, and in what way. In each case, there are proper limits to criticism, albeit different ones. Like anything else, criticism is not always a good thing.
Bruun, H. H.1972. Science, values and politics in Max Weber’s methodology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
7.
Caute, D.1964. Communism and the French intellectuals 1914-1960. London: André Deutsch.
8.
Cohen, G. A.1982. Karl Marx and the withering away of social science. Philosophy and Public Affairs1:182-203.
9.
Dews, P.1986. The nouvelle philosophie and Foucault. In Towards a critique of Foucault, edited by M. Gane.London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
10.
Dews, P.1987. Logics of disintegration: Post-structuralist thought and the claims of critical theory. London: Verso.
11.
Dryzek, J. S.1990. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Forster, M.1989. Hegel and skepticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Foucault, M., and G. Deleuze. [1972] 1977. Intellectuals and power. In M. Foucault, Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault, edited by D. F. Bouchard.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Gitlin, A., M. Siegel, and K. Boru. 1989. The politics of method: From leftist ethnography to educative research. International Journal of Qualitative Research in Education2 (3): 237-253.
15.
Gray, J.1995. Berlin. London: Fontana.
16.
Griffiths, M.1998. Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
17.
Haack, S.1998. Manifesto of a passionate moderate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Habermas, J.[1985] 1987. The philosophical discourse of modernity, translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity.
19.
Habermas, J.[1962] 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere, translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Hammersley, M.1992. What’s wrong with ethnography?London: Routledge.
21.
Hammersley, M.1995. The politics of social research. London: Sage.
22.
Hammersley, M.1997a.Educational inequalities. In the Open University course EU208Exploring Educational Issues, Block 5. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
23.
Hammersley, M.1997b. Educational research and teaching: A response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture. British Educational Research Journal23 (2): 141-161.
24.
Reprinted in H. Piper and I. Stronach, eds., Educational reseach: Difference & diversity. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate2004.
25.
Hammersley, M.1999. Sociology, what’s it for? A critique of the grand conception. Sociological Research Online4 (3). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/4/3/hammersley.html.
26.
Hammersley, M.2000a. Taking sides in research: Essays on bias and partisanship. London: Routledge.
27.
Hammersley, M.2000b. Varieties of social research: A typology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology3:221-229.
28.
Hammersley, M.2002. Educational research, policy and practice. London: Paul Chapman.
29.
Hartung, F. E.1970. Problems of the sociology of knowledge. In The sociology of knowledge: A reader, edited by J. E. Curtis and J. W. Petras.London: Duckworth.
30.
Hindess, B.1987. Freedom, equality, and the market. London: Tavistock.
31.
Holub, R. C.1991. Jürgen Habermas: Critic in the public sphere. London: Routledge.
32.
Horkheimer, M.1972. Traditional and critical theory. In Critical Theory: Selected essays. New York: Seabury.
33.
Jennings, J.1997.Of treason, blindness and silence: Dilemmas of the intellectual in modern France. In Intellectuals in politics: From the Dreyfus Affair to Salman Rushdie, edited by J. Jennings and A. Kemp-Welch.London: Routledge.
34.
Larmore, C.1987. Patterns of moral complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Lichtheim, G.1971. From Marx to Hegel and other essays. London: Orbach and Chambers.
36.
Lukes, S.1985. Marxism and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Marcuse, H.1964. One dimensional man: The ideology of industrial society. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
38.
Merton, R. K.1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Nichols, R. L. 1965. The intellectual and modern politics: Julien Benda and the case of France. Ph.D. diss., Department of Politics, Princeton University.
40.
O’Neill, J.1972. On theory and criticism in Marx. In J. O’Neill, Sociology as a skin trade. London: Heinemann.
41.
Patai, D.1994. When method becomes power. In Power and method: Political activism in educational research, edited by A. Gitlin.New York: Routledge.
42.
Prokopczyk, C.1980. Truth and reality in Marx and Hegel: A reassessment. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
43.
Rawls, J.1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Readings, B.1993. Foreword. In J-F. Lyotard, Political writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schalk, D.1979. The spectrum of political engagement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Weber, M.1949. The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
48.
Weber, M.1974. Max Weber on universities: The power of the state and the dignity of the academic calling in Imperial Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Westen, P.1990. Speaking of equality: An analysis of the rhetorical force of “equality’ in moral and legal discourse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Williams, B.1962. The idea of equality. In Philosophy, Politics and Society, second series, edited by P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman.Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Wittgenstein, L.1969. On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
Woolgar, S., and D. Pawluch. 1985. Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems32:314-327.
