Systemism and social mechanisms, as articulated by Bunge, are concepts with great potential for application to assessment of research progress. This study will use the conceptual tools made available by systemism and social mechanisms to evaluate the International Crisis Behavior (ICB) Project as a scientific effort toward the greater understanding of crises in world politics. Systemism and social mechanisms are articulated as key concepts in the quest for scientific progress. The goals and basic characteristics of the ICB Project as a scientific venture then are described. The ICB Project is assessed in terms of how well it lives up to standards for scientific progress. Finally, conclusions and ideas about future research are presented. The basic finding of this study is that the ICB Project is quite successful in meeting the standards for scientific progress entailed by the concepts of systemism and social mechanisms.
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Brecher, Michael. 1977. Toward a theory of international crisis behavior. International Studies Quarterly21: 39-74.
3.
Brecher, Michael. 1980a. Decisions in crisis: Israel, 1967 and 1973 With Benjamin Geist. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Brecher, Michael. 1980b. The International Crisis Behavior Project: An interim report. Comparative Foreign Policy Notes8: 32-40.
5.
Brecher, Michael. 1993. Crises in world politics: Theory and reality. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
6.
Brecher, Michael. 1999. International studies in the twentieth century and beyond: Flawed dichotomies, synthesis, cumulation. International Studies Quarterly43: 213-264.
7.
Brecher, Michael, and Patrick James. 1986. Crisis and change in world politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
Brecher, Michael, Patrick James, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 2000. Escalation and war in the twentieth century: Findings from the International Crisis Behavior Project. In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
Brecher, Michael, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1997. A study of crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Bunge, Mario. 1996. Finding philosophy in social science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Bunge, Mario. 1998a. Philosophy of science, volume I: From problem to theory. Rev. ed.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
12.
Bunge, Mario. 1998b. Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
13.
Bunge, Mario. 2004. How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34: 182-210.
14.
Dowty, Alan. 1984. Middle East crisis: U.S. decision-making in 1958, 1970, and 1973. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman, eds. 2003. Progress in international relations theory: Methods and metrics of scientific change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Hensel, Paul R.2000. Territory: Theory and evidence on geography and conflict. In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
International Crisis Behavior Project. 2003. ICB Version 4 (1918-2001). http://www.icbnet.org/.
18.
James, Patrick. 1993. The great powers and crisis-generated instability: Some preliminary findings. Journal of International Studies30: 1-25.
19.
James, Patrick. 2002a. International relations and scientific progress: Structural realism reconsidered. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
20.
James, Patrick. 2002b. Systemism and international relations: Toward a reassessment of realism. In Millennial reflections on international studies, edited by Michael Brecher and Frank P. Harvey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Mugrave. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Mayntz, Renate. 2004. Mechanisms in the analysis of macro-social phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34: 237-259.
25.
Midlarsky, Manus I.2000. Introduction. In Handbook of war studies II, edited by Manus I. Midarsky. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
Morgenthau, Hans J.1946. Scientific man versus power politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Morgenthau, Hans J., and Kenneth W. Thompson. 1985. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. 6th ed.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
28.
Ray, James Lee. 2000. Democracy: On the level(s), does democracy correlate with peace? In What do we know about war? edited by John A. Vasquez. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
Sandler, Todd. 2001. Economic concepts for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2004. The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34: 260-282.
31.
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34: 211-236.
32.
Vasquez, John A.1993. The war puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Vasquez, John A.1998. The power of power politics. 2nd ed.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34.
Waltz, Kenneth N.1979. Theoryof international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
