Agassi, J. 1964. The nature of scientific problems and their roots in metaphysics. In The critical approach to science and philosophy, edited by M. Bunge, 189-211. London: Collier-Macmillan.
2.
Agassi, J. 1968. Science in flux: Footnotes to Popper. Boston Studies in the Philosophy ofScience3:293-323.
3.
Agassi, J. 1971. Tautology and testability in economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences1:49-63.
4.
Agassi, J. 2002. Atouch of malice: Areview essay. Philosophy of the Social Sciences32:107-119.
5.
Archibald, G. C. 1961. Chamberlin versus Chicago. Review of Economic Studies29:1-28.
6.
Archibald, G. C. 1966. Refutation or comparison. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science17:279-296.
7.
Backhouse, R. 1997. Truth and progress in economic knowledge. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
8.
Backhouse, R.ed. 1994. New directions in economic methodologyLondon: Routledge.
9.
Bartley, W. 1964a. Rationality vs. the theory of rationality. In The critical approach in science and philosophy, edited by M. Bunge, 3-31. London: Collier-Macmillan.
10.
Bartley, W. 1964b. The retreat to commitment. London: Chatto & Windus.
11.
Bartley, W. 1968. Theories of demarcation between science and metaphysics. In Problems in the philosophy of science, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 40-64. Amsterdam: North Holland.
12.
Blaug, M. 1968. Economic theory in retrospect. Homewood, AL: Irwin.
13.
Blaug, M. 1975. Kuhn versus Lakatos, or paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics. History of Political Economy7:399-433.
14.
Blaug, M. 1980. The methodology of economicsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Blaug, M. 1992. The methodology of economics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Blaug, M. 1994. Why I amnot a constructivist: Confessions of an unrepentant Popperian.In New directions in economic methodology, edited by R. Backhouse, 109-136. London: Routledge.
17.
Boland, L. 1971. Methodology as an exercise in economic analysis. Philosophy of Science38:105-117.
18.
Boland, L. 1981. On the futility of criticizing the neoclassical maximization hypothesis. American Economic Review71:1031-1036.
19.
Boland, L. 1982. The foundations of economic method. London: Routledge.
20.
Boland, L. 1989. The methodology of economic model building: Methodology after Samuelson. London: Routledge.
21.
Boland, L. 1994. Scientific thinking without scientific method: two views of Popper. In New directions in economic methodology, edited by R. Backhouse, 154-172. London: Routledge.
22.
Boland, L.. 1997. Critical economic methodology: A personal odyssey. London: Routledge.
23.
Boland, L.. 1998. Conventionalism. In Handbook of economic methodology, edited by W. Hands, J. Davis, and U. Mäki. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
24.
Boland, L. 2003. The foundations of economic method, 2nd ed. London: Geo. Allen& Unwin.
25.
Caldwell, B. 1980. Positivist philosophy of science and the methodology of economics.Journal Economic Issues14:53-76.
26.
Caldwell, B. 1982. Beyond positivism. London: Geo. Allen & Unwin.
27.
Caldwell, B.1994. Two proposals for the recovery of economic practice. In New directions in economic methodology, edited by R. Backhouse, 137-153. London: Routledge.
28.
de Marchi, N. 1988a. Popper and the LSE economists. In The Popperian legacy in economics: Papers presented at a symposium in Amsterdam, December 1985, edited by N. de Marchi, 139-166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Caldwell, B. ed. 1988b. The Popperian legacy in economics: Papers presented at a symposium inAmsterdam, December 1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Dow, S. 2002. Economic methodology: An inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Hands, D. W. 1979. The methodology of economic research programmes (review of Latsis [1976]). Philosophy of the Social Sciences9:293-303.
32.
Hands, D. W. 1985. Karl Popper andeconomicmethodology. Economics and Philosophy1:83-99.
33.
Hands, D. W. 1993. Popper and Lakatos in economic methodology. In Rationality, institutions and economic methodology, edited by U. Mäki, B. Gustafsson, and C. Knudsen, 61-75. London: Routledge.
34.
Hands, D. W. 1996. Karl Popper on the myth of the framework Popperians +1, unrepentant Popperians–1 (review of Karl Popper). Journal of Economic Methodology3:317-347.
35.
Hausman, D. 1988. An appraisal of Popperian methodology. In The Popperian legacy in economics: Papers presented at a symposium in Amsterdam, December 1985edited by N. de Marchi, 65-85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Hutchison, T. 1938. The significance and basic postulates of economic theory. London: Macmillan.
37.
Hutchison, T.1988. The case for falsification. In The Popperian legacy in economics: Papers presented at a symposium in Amsterdam, December 1985edited by N. de Marchi, 169-181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Jarvie, I. 2001. The republic of science: The emergence of Popper’s social view of science, 1935-1945. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
39.
Klappholz, K. and J. Agassi. 1959. Methodological prescriptions in economics. Economica26 (NS): 60-74.
40.
Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 91-196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Latsis, S. 1972. Situational determinism in economics. British Journal for the Philosophy ofScience23:207-245.
42.
Latsis, S. 1976. Methodology and appraisal in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Machlup, F. 1955. The problem of verification in economics. Southern Economic Journal22:1-21.
44.
Popper, K. 1959. Logic of scientific discovery. New York: Science Editions.
45.
Popper, K. 1962. The open society and its enemies. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
46.
Popper, K. 1963. Models, instruments and truth. Popper1994: 130-184.
47.
Popper, K. 1965. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
48.
Popper, K. 1972. Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Popper, K. 1983. Realism and the aim of science. London: Routledge.
50.
Popper, K. 1994. The myth of the framework: In defense of science and rationality(M. Natturno, ed.). London: Routledge.
51.
Samuelson, P. 1965. Foundations of economic analysis. New York: Atheneum.
52.
Sassower, R. 1985. Philosophy of economics: A critique of demarcation. New York: University Press of America.
53.
Wong, S. 1973. The “F-twist” and the methodology of Paul Samuelson. AmericanEconomic Review63:312-325.
54.
Wong, S. 1978. The foundations of Paul Samuelson’s revealed preference theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
