Brandom, Robert. 1979. Freedom and constraint by norms. American PhilosophicalQuarterly16:187-196.
2.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
Fine, Arthur. 1986. The shaky game: Einstein, realism, and the quantum theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Fuller, Steve. 1989. Philosophy of science and its discontents. Boulder, CO: Westview.
5.
Fuller, Steve. 1992. Social epistemology and the research agenda of science studies. In Science as practice and culture, edited by A. Pickering, 390-428. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1980. Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative, and the philosophy of science. In Paradigms and revolutions: Applications and appraisals of Thomas Kuhn’s philosophy of science, edited by G. Gutting, 54-74. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
8.
Remedios, Francis. 2003. Fuller and Rouse on the legitimation of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences33(4):444-463.
Rouse, Joseph. 1991. 1996. Beyond epistemic sovereignty. In The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power, edited by P. Galison and D. Stump, 398-416. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Rouse, Joseph. 1991. 2002. How scientific practices matter: Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Taylor, Charles. 1991. The dialogical self. In The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture, edited by D. Hiley, J. Bohman, R. Shusterman, 304-314. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
