Adam, A. M.1992. Einstein, Michelson, and crucial experiment revisited. Methodology and Science25:117-128.
2.
(Reprinted in Joseph Agassi, The gentle art of philosophical polemics: Selected reviews and comments, Peru, IL: Open Court, 1988).
3.
Agassi, Joseph. [1963] 1967. Towards an historiography of science, history and theory, Beiheft 2. [The Hague: Mouton]; Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
4.
(Reprinted in Joseph Agassi, The gentle art of philosophical polemics: Selected reviews and comments, Peru, IL: Open Court, 1988)
5.
(Reprinted in Joseph Agassi, Radiation theory and the quantum revolution, Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, 1993)
6.
Agassi, Joseph. 1971. Faraday as a natural philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Agassi, Joseph. 1977. Towards a rational philosophical anthropology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
8.
Agassi, Joseph. 1980. Between science and technology. Philosophy of Science47:82-99.
9.
Agassi, Joseph. 1981. To save verisimilitude. Mind90:576-579.
10.
Agassi, Joseph. 1983. The structure of the quantum revolution. Philosophy of the Social Sciences13:367-381.
11.
and in Meta-history of science at the Berkeley Congress, Warsaw: Ossolineum Publishing House of the Polish Academy of Science, 1988)
12.
Agassi, Joseph. 1988. The future of big science. J. Applied Philos. 5:17-26.
13.
Agassi, Joseph. 1990a. Newtonianism before and after the Einsteinian revolution. In Some truer method: Reflections on the heritage of Newton, edited by Frank Durham and Robert D. Purrington, 145-176. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Agassi, Joseph. 1990b. Peer review: A personal report. Methodology and Science23:171-180.
15.
Agassi, Joseph. 1995. Naming and necessity: A second look. Iyyun, The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly44:243-272.
16.
Bacon, Sir Francis. [1620] 1960. The new Organon and related writings. New York: Liberal Arts Press.
17.
Bendix, Reinhard. 1970. Embattled reason: Essays on social knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Boyle, Robert. [1661] 1966. Certain physiological essays. In Works, 2nd ed. 1772, edited by Thomas Birch. Reprint, Hildesheim: George Olnsverlagsbucher.
19.
Buchdahl, Gerd. 1965. A revolution in historiography of science. History of Science4:55-69.
20.
Budworth, David, 1981. Public science, private view. Bristol, UK: Hilgar.
21.
Bunge, Mario. 1968. Scientific research, II, the search for truth; studies in the foundations, methodology, and philosophy of science. Berlin: Springer.
22.
Bunge, Mario. 2001. Philosophy in crisis: The need for reconstruction. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
23.
Burke, Dolores, L.1988. A new academic marketplace. New York: Greenwood.
24.
Carnap, Rudolf. 1963. Replies. In The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by Paul A. Schilpp. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
25.
Carnap, Rudolf. 1966. Philosophical foundations of physics. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Cassirrer Ernst. [1910] 1953. Substance and function. New York: Dover.
27.
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1954. Some recent books in the history of science. J. Hist. Ideas15:163-192.
28.
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1956. Franklin and Newton. An inquiry into speculative Newtonian experimental science and Franklin’s work on electricity as an example thereof. Philadelphia: Am. Phil. Soc.
29.
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1974. Newton’s theory vs. Kepler’s theory and Galileo’s theory. In The interaction between science and philosophy, edited by Y. Elkana, 229-338. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
30.
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1987. Revolutions in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Conant, James Bryant. [1952] 1953. Modern science and modern man. New York: Doubleday.
32.
Conant, James Bryant. 1963. The education of American teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Conant, James Bryant. 1964. Shaping educational policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Crane, Diane. 1972. Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Danhof, Clarence H.1968. Government contracting and technological change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36.
Duhem, Pierre. [1914] 1954. The aim and structure of physical theory. Translated by Philip P. Wiener. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Pagination is the same in all editions)
37.
Duhem, Pierre. 1996. Essays in the history and philosophy of science. Translated and edited, with an Introduction, by Roger Ariev and Peter Barker. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
38.
Einstein, Albert. [1949] 1959. Autobiographical notes and replies to criticism. In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Harper.
39.
Einstein, Albert. 1954. Foreword. In Max Jammer, Concepts of space. The history of theories of space in physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Faraday, Michael. 1839. Experimental researches in electricity. London: Bernard Quaritch.
41.
Finkelstein, Martin J.1984. The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
42.
Fuller, Steve. 1989. Philosophy of science and its discontent. Boulder, CO: Westview.
43.
Fulton, J. F.1932. Robert n and his influence on thought in the seventeenth century. Isis18:77-102.
44.
Gelder, Lawrence Van. 1996. Thomas Kuhn. New York Times, 19 June.
45.
Guerlac, Henry. 1954. Review of D. McKie, Lavoisier. Isis45:58-59.
46.
Guerlac, Henry. 1961. Lavoisier: The crucial years: The background and origin of his first experiments on combustion in 1772. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47.
Hacking, Ian. 1993. Working in a new world: The taxonomic solution. In World changes: Thomas Kuhn and the nature of science, edited by P. Horwich. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1964. On the structure of physical knowledge. In Education and the structure of knowledge, edited by Stanley Elam, 148-187. Chicago: Rand McNally.
50.
Harding, Sandra G.1976. Can theories be refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine thesis. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
51.
Hempel, Carl G.1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
Hempel, Carl G.1979. Scientific rationality: Analytic vs. pragmatic perspectives. In Rationality today, edited by T. F. Graetz. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
53.
Hempel, Carl G.1983. Valuation and objectivity in science. In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum, edited by R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
54.
Hershberg, James G.1993. James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima and the making of the nuclear age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
Hesse, Mary B.1963. Review of T. S. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions. Isis54:286-287.
56.
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1975. Rudolf Carnap, logical empiricist. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
57.
Hull, David. 1999. The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology and Philosophy14:481-504.
58.
Jaki, Stanley L.1984. Uneasy genius: The life and work of Pierre Duhem. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
59.
Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul F.1955. Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
60.
Kowarski, Lew. 1977. New forms of organization in physical research after 1945. In History of twentieth century physics, edited by C. Wiener, 370-401. New York: Academic Press.
61.
Koyré, Alexandre. 1939. Études Galiléenne. Paris: Hermann.
62.
Koyré, Alexandre. [1965] 1968. Newtonian studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
Kragh, Helge. 1987. An introduction to the historiography of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1963. The function of dogma in scientific research and discussion. In Scientific change: Historical studies in the intellectual, social and technical conditions for scientific discovery and technical invention, from antiquity to the present: Symposium on the history of science Oxford 9-15 July 1961, edited by A. C. Crombie, 347-369, 386-395. New York: Basic Books.
66.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1966. Review of Towards an historiography of science, history and theory, Beiheft 2, by Joseph Agassi. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science17:256-258.
67.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2d ed., enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1977. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1978. Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity 1894-1912. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
Kuhn, Thomas S.1984. Revisiting Planck. Hist. Stud. in the Physical Sciences14:231-252.
71.
Laudan, L.1983. The demise of the demarcation problem. In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum, edited by R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan, 111-127. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
72.
Lipset, Seymor Martin, and David Riesman. 1975. Education and politics in Harvard. New York: McGraw-Hill.
73.
Manuel, Frank E.1968. A portrait of Isaac Newton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
McKie, Donald. [1952] 1962. Antoine Lavoisier. London: Colliers.
75.
Murzi, Mauro. 2001. Rudolf Carnap. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www/utm.edu/research/iep/c/carnap.htm.
76.
Newton, Isaac. [1687] 1972. Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Newton-Smith. 1981. The rationality of science. London: Routledge.
Piaget, Jean. [1965] 1971. Insights and illusions of philosophy. London: Routledge.
80.
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
81.
Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The republic of science. Minerva1:54-73.
82.
Polanyi, Michael. 1963. Comments (on Kuhn’s paper). In Scientific change: Historical studies in the intellectual, social and technical conditions for scientific discovery and technical invention, from antiquity to the present: Symposium on the history of science Oxford 9-15 July 1961, edited by A. C. Crombie, 375-380. New York: Basic Books.
83.
Polanyi, Michael. 1967. The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
84.
Polanyi, Michael. 1969. Knowing and being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Popper, Karl. 1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
86.
Popper, Karl. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
87.
Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic Books.
88.
Popper, Karl. 1972. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
89.
Price, Derek J. de Solla. 1961. Science since Babylon. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
90.
Quine, Willard v. O.1986. Reply to Jules Vuillemin. In The philosophy of W. V. Quine, edited by L. E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp, 619-622. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
91.
Quine, Willard v. O.1988. Comments on Agassi’s remarks. Journal for General Philosophy of Science19:117-118.
92.
Reed, Edward S.1987. Why ideas are not in the mind. In Abner Shimony and Debra Nails, eds., Naturalistic epistemology: A symposium of two decades, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 100, 215-229. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
93.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1944. Philosophical foundations of quantum mechanics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
94.
Rogers, Everett. 1962. Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
95.
Rovere, Richard H.1959. Senator Joe McCarthy. London: Methuen.
96.
Russell, Bertrand. 1917. Mysticism and logic. London: Allen and Unwin.
97.
Russell, Bertrand. [1940] 1962. An inquiry into meaning and truth. Hammondsworth, UK: Pelican.
98.
Sankey, Howard. 1997. Kuhn’s ontological relativism. In Issues and images in the philosophy of science: Scientific and philosophical essays in honour of Azarya Polikarov. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, edited by Dimitri Ginev and Robert S. Cohen, 305-329. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
99.
Scheibe, Erhard. 1997. The problem of reduction in special relativity. In Issues and images in the philosophy of science: Scientific and philosophical essays in honour of Azarya Polikarov. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, edited by Dimitri Ginev and Robert S. Cohen, 321-342. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
100.
(Originally in R. S. Cohenet al., Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel, 1976)
101.
Stravinsky, Igor. [1936] 1962. An autobiography. New York: W. W. Norton.
102.
Toulmin, Stephen. 2001. Return to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103.
Vuillemin, Jules. 1986. On Duhem’s and Quine’s theses. In The philosophy of W. V. Quine, edited by L. E. Hahn and P. A. Schlipp, 595-618. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
104.
Wedberg, Anders. 1975. Decision and belief in science. In Jaakko Hintikka, Rudolph Carnap, logical empiricist, 161-181. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
105.
Weinberg, Alvin M.1963. Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva1:159-171.
106.
Whittaker, E. T.1913. Reports of the British Association. London: Murray; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107.
Ziman, John. 1968. Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108.
Zuckermann, Harriet. 1988. Sociology of science. In Handbook of sociology, edited by Neil Smelser, chap. 16, 511-574. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
