Hong Kong's success in economic growth is well known. One of the contributing factors could be legalized betting. Even after the transition of sovereignty from Britain to China, it is guaranteed that gambling activities will continue to exist. How active is gambling in Hong Kong? How large is the volume? This article investigates the gambling behavior of the Hong Kong people and tests the life cycle of the gambling business. Findings suggest that the people of Hong Kong have a rational basis for their gambling and that horse racing enjoys a longer life cycle than the lottery.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunkGregory G. (1981). “A Test of the Friedman-Savage Gambling Model.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95: 341–48.
2.
FriedmanMiltonSavageL. J. (1946). “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risks.”Journal of Political Economy, 56: 288.
3.
Hong Kong Government, Census and Statistics Department.Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics, various issues.
4.
Hong Kong Commissioner of Inland Revenue.Annual Review on the Activities of the Inland Revenue Department, various issues.
5.
McGowanRichard (1994). State Lotteries and Legalized Gambling: Painless Revenue or Painful Mirage?Westport, CT: Praeger.
6.
MuntingRoger (1996). An Economic and Social History of Gambling in Britain and the USA, Manchester UK: Manchester University Press.
7.
PryorF. L. (1976). “The Friedman-Savage Utility Function in Cross-Cultural Perspective.”Journal of Political Economy, 84: 823–24.
8.
RosecranceJohn D. (1988). Gambling without Guilt: The Legitimation of an American Pastime.Brooks/Cole.
9.
Royal Hong Kong Jockey Club.Annual Report and Accounts, various issues.
