Previous findings that the hotel room tax can be passed on are contradicted in this re-examination of the tax. Tax incidence analysis is used to illustrate the extent to which hotel operators can pass on the tax, and evidence is presented that tourists are moreprice sensitive than previously believed. The suggestion is made that earmarking the tax funds to develop the tourist industry may help overcome negative effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbel, A. and S.A. Ravid (1983a), "An Industry Energy Price Impact Model: The Case of the Hotel Industry," Applied Economics15, 705-714.
2.
—( 1983b), "The Differential Impact of Gas Shortages and Fuel Price Increases on Demand: The Case of the Hotel Industry in New York State," The Energy Journal4, 165-171.
3.
Combs, J.P. and B. Elledge (1979), "Effects of Room Tax on Resort Hotels/ Motels ," National Tax Journal32, 201-207.
4.
Ebel, R. and J. Mak (1974), "The Economics of Higher Tourist Taxes," in Current Issues in Hawaii's Economy, Honolulu : Cross Roads Press, pp.13-14.
5.
Fukii, E., M. Khaled, and J. Mak (1985), "The Exportability of Hotel Occupancy and Other Tourist Taxes," National Tax Journal, 169-177.
6.
Lin, T.B. (1984), "A Comparative Econometric Study of Tourist Expenditure Behavior in Asia," Hong Kong Economic Papers. No. 15, pp. 35-66.
7.
Mak, J. and E. Nishimura (1979), "The Economics of a Hotel Room Tax," Journal of travel Research, 17 (4), 2-6.
8.
Musgrave, R. and P. Musgrave (1976), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw Hill.
9.
Sakai, Y. (1985), A Micro-Analysis of Demand for Travel Goods: An Application to the Business Traveler, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
