The results from three advertising conversion studies are presented. Mail questionnaires were sent to advertising coupon inquirers in each study. Nonrespon dents of first and second questionnaire mailings were less likely to visit compared to the respondents of the first questionnaire mailings. Respondents from second and third compared to first mailings who did convert into visitors had different travel behavior patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Assael, Henry and John Keon (1982), "Nonsampling vs. Sampling Errors in Survey Research ," Journal of Marketing46 (Spring), 114-123.
2.
Ellerbrock, Michael J. (1981), "Improving Coupon Conversion Studies," Journal of Travel Research19 (Spring), 37-38.
3.
Heberlein, T.A. and R.A. Baumgartner (1978), "Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature ," American Sociological Review43 (August), 447-462.
4.
Houston, Michael J. and Neil M. Ford (1976), "Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research in Mail Surveys," Journal of Marketing Research13 (November), 397-403.
5.
Houston, Michael J. and John Nevin (1977), "The Effects of Source and
6.
Appeal on Mail Survey Response Patterns," Journal of Marketing Research14 (August), 374-378.
7.
Hunt, John D. and Michael J. Dalton (1983), "Comparing Mail and Telephone for Conducting Coupon Conversion Studies," Journal of Travel Research, 21 (Winter) 16-18.
8.
Kanuk, Leslie and Conrad Berenson (1975), "Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review," Journal of Marketing Research12 (November), 440-453.
9.
Leslie, Larry (1972), "Are High Response Rates Essential to Valid Surveys? " Social Science ResearchI (September), 323-334.
