A critical gap exists in the tourism marketing literature due to the lack of systematic evidence regarding the optimal matching of influencer types (human and virtual) with creative tourism subtypes (traditional and contemporary) to enhance tourist immersion and participation. This study conducted an electroencephalography experiment and two online surveys. Results confirm human influencers enhance effectiveness for traditional creative tourism, while virtual influencers perform better for contemporary creative tourism. These matches were associated with lower theta and alpha activity, a pattern consistent with more efficient processing and stronger engagement within the video-viewing context. Further, novelty perception is primarily driven by tourism content rather than influencer type, and creative self-efficacy negatively moderates the positive effect of immersion on participation intention. Practically, marketers should pair human influencers with traditional activities and virtual influencers with contemporary experiences. Furthermore, campaigns should use highly immersive content to engage tourists with lower creative self-efficacy.
AgarwalR.KarahannaE. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 665–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
2.
AikateriniM.IsabelleU.VolkerK. (2024). The travel influencer construct: An empirical exploration and validation. Tourism Management, 101, Article 104858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104858
AliI.SaleemM. U.KhanA. A.NazA.NawazM.KhanH. (2025). An enhanced artificial intelligence generated virtual influencer framework: Examining the effects of emotional display on user engagement based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(4), 184–209. https://doi.org/10.63075/mnt2cn93
5.
AmeenN.CheahJ.-H.AliF.El-ManstrlyD.KulyciuteR. (2024). Risk, trust, and the roles of human versus virtual influencers. Journal of Travel Research, 63(6), 1370–1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231190601
6.
AndonopoulosV.LeeJ. J.MathiesC. (2023). Authentic isn’t always best: When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, Article 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103521
7.
AudrezetA.KolesB. (2023). Virtual influencer as a brand avatar in interactive marketing. In WangC. L. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of interactive marketing (pp. 353–376). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14961-0_16
8.
BaixinhoA.SantosC.CoutoG.AlbergariaI. S. d.SilvaL. S. d.MedeirosP. D.SimasR. M. N. (2021). Islandscapes and sustainable creative tourism: A conceptual framework and guidelines for best practices. Land, 10(12), Article 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121302
9.
BerendsH.WolkorteR.IjzermanM.Van PuttenM. (2013). Differential cortical activation during observation and observation-and-imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3571-8
10.
BeverlandM. B.LindgreenA.VinkM. W. (2008). Projecting authenticity through advertising: Consumer judgments of advertisers’ claims. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370101
BlomstervikI. H.OlsenS. O. (2022). Progress on novelty in tourism: An integration of personality, attitudinal and emotional theoretical foundations. Tourism Management, 93, Article 104574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104574
13.
BooyensI.RogersonC. M. (2015). Creative tourism in Cape Town: An innovation perspective. Urban Forum, 26, 405–424
14.
BuhalisD.LeungD.LinM. (2023). Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing. Tourism Management, 97, Article 104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104724
15.
BulumullaD.EpaU.GamageT. (2023). Effect of social media influencer involvement on tourists’ travel intentions: Mediating role of traveler authenticity and destination image. South Asian Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 3(2), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.4038/sajth.v3i2.74
16.
ButlerR.PearceD. G. (1993). Tourism research: Critiques and challenges. Routledge.
17.
ByunK. J.AhnS. J. (2023). A systematic review of virtual influencers: Similarities and differences between human and virtual influencers in interactive advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/0000-0002-4377-1222
18.
ChenJ.WuX.LaiI. K. W. (2023). A systematic literature review of virtual technology in hospitality and tourism (2013–2022). SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231193297. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193297
19.
ChenJ.ZhangY.CaiH.LiuL.LiaoM.FangJ. (2024). A comprehensive overview of micro-influencer marketing: Decoding the current landscape, impacts, and trends. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), Article 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030243
20.
ChoiM.ChoiY.LeeH. (2024). Gen Z travelers in the Instagram marketplace: Trust, influencer type, post type, and purchase intention. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(6), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480231180938
21.
ChuK.LeeD.-H.KimJ. Y. (2018). The effect of non-stereotypical gender role advertising on consumer evaluation. In YoonS.OhS. (Eds.), Social and environmental issues in advertising (pp. 116–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1110942
22.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. BMC Gastroenterol, 11, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-32
23.
DaliriM. R.TaghizadehM.NiksiratK. S. (2013). EEG signature of object categorization from event-related potentials. Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors, 3(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.4103/2228-7477.114318
24.
DangV. T. (2020). Information confusion and intention to stop using social networking site: A moderated mediation study of psychological distress and perceived novelty. Information Technology and People, 33(5), 1427–1452. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2020-0117
25.
DiniH.SimonettiA.BigneE.BruniL. E. (2022). EEG theta and N400 responses to congruent versus incongruent brand logos. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 4490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08363-1
DuffyB. E.HundE. (2019). Gendered visibility on social media: Navigating Instagram’s authenticity bind. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4983–5002.
28.
EisendM. (2007). Understanding two-sided persuasion: An empirical assessment of theoretical approaches. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20176
29.
El HedhliK.ZourrigH.Al KhateebA.AlnawasI. (2023). Stereotyping human-like virtual influencers in retailing: Does warmth prevail over competence?Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, Article 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103459
EvansR. I. (1989). Albert Bandura: The man and his ideas—a dialogue. Praeger Publishers.
32.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
33.
FrankeC.Groeppel-KleinA. (2024). The role of psychological distance and construal level in explaining the effectiveness of human-like vs. cartoon-like virtual influencers. Journal of Business Research, 185, Article 114916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114916
34.
FrankeC.Groeppel-KleinA.MüllerK. (2023). Consumers’ responses to virtual influencers as advertising endorsers: Novel and effective or uncanny and deceiving?Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2154721
35.
FüllerJ.HutterK.FaullantR. (2011). Why co-creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R&D Management, 41(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00640.x
36.
GargM.BakshiA. (2024). Exploring the impact of beauty vloggers’ credible attributes, parasocial interaction, and trust on consumer purchase intention in influencer marketing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02760-9
37.
GhalyM. I. (2023). The influence of user-generated content and social media travel influencers credibility on the visit intention of Generation Z. Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality, 24(2), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaauth.2023.218047.1477
38.
GrönroosC.RavaldA. (2011). Service as business logic: Implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111106893
39.
GuoS.DengN.HeZ. (2025). Influential and worthy: A video-centric exploration of travel influencers’ value chain logic. Journal of Travel Research, 64(6), 1355–1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875241249428
40.
HeY.SongH. (2009). A mediation model of tourists’ repurchase intentions for packaged tour services. Journal of Travel Research, 47(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508321206
41.
Hernández-MéndezJ.Baute-DíazN. (2024). Influencer marketing in the promotion of tourist destinations: Mega, macro and micro-influencers. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(8), 1332–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2214354
42.
Hernández-MéndezJ.Baute-DíazN.Gutiérrez-TañoD. (2026). The effectiveness of virtual versus human influencer marketing for tourism destinations. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 32(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667241276212
43.
HornD.SalvendyG. (2006). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 16(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20047
44.
HortonD.Richard WohlR. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
45.
HuangL.KrasikovaD. V.LiuD. (2016). I can do it, so can you: The role of leader creative self-efficacy in facilitating follower creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.12.002
46.
HyuckK. S.KyungS. M.ChangsupS. (2020). Storytelling by medical tourism agents and its effect on trust and behavioral intention. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(6), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2020.1795046
47.
IslamN.SadhukhanS. (2024). Progress in creative tourism research: A review for the period 2002–2023. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 29(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2024.2333489
48.
JangW.KimJ.KimS.ChunJ. W. (2021). The role of engagement in travel influencer marketing: The perspectives of dual process theory and the source credibility model. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(17), 2416–2420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1845126
JayaT. N. (2022). Role of social media influencers in tourism destination image: How does digital marketing affect purchase intention?Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vocational Higher Education (ICVHE 2018). Atlantis Press.
51.
JhawarA. (2026). Can virtual influencers induce destination visit intentions? A mediation analysis journey through the Uncanny Valley. Journal of Travel Research, 65(2), 354–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875241291144
52.
JiangK.ZhengJ.LuoS. (2024). Green power of virtual influencer: The role of virtual influencer image, emotional appeal, and product involvement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, Article 103660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103660
53.
JuN.KimT.ImH. (2024). Fake human but real influencer: The interplay of authenticity and humanlikeness in Virtual Influencer communication?Fashion and Textiles, 11(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-024-00380-0
54.
JungN.ImS. (2021). The mechanism of social media marketing: Influencer characteristics, consumer empathy, immersion, and sponsorship disclosure. International Journal of Advertising, 40(8), 1265–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1991107
55.
KaminsM. A.GuptaK. (1994). Congruence between spokesperson and product type: A matchup hypothesis perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 11(6), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110605
56.
KapitanS.SilveraD. H. (2016). From digital media influencers to celebrity endorsers: Attributions drive endorser effectiveness. Marketing Letters, 27, 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9363-0
57.
KapoorP. S.BalajiM.JiangY.JebarajakirthyC. (2022). Effectiveness of travel social media influencers: A case of eco-friendly hotels. Journal of Travel Research, 61(5), 1138–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211019469
58.
KetterE. (2020). Millennial travel: Tourism micro-trends of European Generation Y. Journal of Tourism Futures, 7(2), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-10-2019-0106
59.
KockF.BerbekovaA.AssafA. G. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, Article 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330
60.
LeeE.-J. (2020). Authenticity model of (mass-oriented) computer-mediated communication: Conceptual explorations and testable propositions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz025
61.
LiH.LeiY.ZhouQ.YuanH. (2023). Can you sense without being human? Comparing virtual and human influencers endorsement effectiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, Article 103456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103456
62.
LiP. Q.KovacsJ. F. (2024). Creative tourism and visitor motivation. International Journal of Tourism Research, 26(1), Article e2601. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2601
63.
LiuF.LeeY.-H. (2024). Virtually authentic: Examining the match-up hypothesis between human vs virtual influencers and product types. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 33(2), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2023-4418
64.
LiuS. W.WangJ.KimH. C. (2022). A convergent study on the impact mechanism of social media influencers traits on users travel intention in the field. [Korea Science & Art Forum] 한국과학예술융합학회, 40(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2022.09.30.311
65.
LiuX. S.WanL. C.HouY. (2024). Relaxing or challenging? How social crowding influences the effectiveness of activity-based destination advertising. Tourism Management, 100, Article 104839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104839
66.
LouC.KiewS. T. J.ChenT.LeeT. Y. M.OngJ. E. C.PhuaZ. (2023). Authentically fake? How consumers respond to the influence of virtual influencers. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641
67.
LouC.YuanS. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
68.
Ma’arifL. A. A.RatnawatiK.HapsariR. D. V. (2023). The authenticity and social media effect on revisit intention mediated by destination image. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 12(4), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i4.2660
69.
MaJ.LiF. S. (2023). How does self-construal shape tourists’ image perceptions of paradox destinations? The mediating roles of cognitive flexibility and destination involvement. Tourism Management, 95, Article 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104664
70.
MaghrifaniD.LiuF.SneddonJ. (2022). Understanding potential and repeat visitors’ travel intentions: The roles of travel motivations, destination image, and visitor image congruity. Journal of Travel Research, 61(5), 1121–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211018508
71.
MainolfiG.Lo PrestiL.MarinoV.FilieriR. (2022). “YOU POST, I TRAVEL.” Bloggers’ credibility, digital engagement, and travelers’ behavioral intention: The mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1022–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21638
72.
MaitlandR. (2008). Conviviality and everyday life: The appeal of new areas of London for visitors. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.621
73.
MaoZ.GuanZ.GuX. (2023). How do level of novelty and camera angle of tourism-themed short videos on Douyin influence potential travelers’ behavioral intentions?Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(9), 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0108
74.
MengL. M.BieY.YangM.WangY. (2025). The effect of human versus virtual influencers: The roles of destination types and self-referencing processes. Tourism Management, 106, Article 104978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104978
75.
MirowskaA.ArsenyanJ. (2023). Sweet escape: The role of empathy in social media engagement with human versus virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 174, Article 103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103008
76.
MisraS.BeattyS. E. (1990). Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence: An assessment of recall and affect. Journal of Business Research, 21(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90050-N
77.
MoT.WangW. (2025). The virtual new or the real old? The effect of temporal alignment between influencer virtuality and brand heritage narration on consumers’ luxury consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 42(2), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22132
78.
MorhartF.MalärL.GuèvremontA.GirardinF.GrohmannB. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006
MoustakasE.LambaN.MahmoudD.RanganathanC. (2020). Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. 2020 international conference on cyber security and protection of digital services (cyber security). IEEE.
81.
NadanyiovaM.GajanovaL.MajerovaJ. (2020). Green marketing as a part of the socially responsible brand’s communication from the aspect of generational stratification. Sustainability, 12(17), Article 7118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177118
82.
NadlifatinR.PersadaS. F.MuntheJ. H.ArdiansyahmirajaB.RediA. A. N. P.PrasetyoY. T.BelgiawanP. F. (2022). Understanding factors influencing traveler’s adoption of travel influencer advertising: An Information Adoption Model approach. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 131–140.
83.
NazirM.WaniT. A. (2025). Human vs virtual influencers and message framing: Enhancing environmental awareness, activism and sustainable purchase intentions through effective messaging. Management Research Review, 48(5), 685–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-08-2024-0630
84.
NewmanA.HermanH.SchwarzG.NielsenI. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001
85.
NgT. W.LucianettiL. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social–cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000029
OngY. X.SunT.ItoN. (2022). Beyond influencer credibility: The power of content and parasocial relationship on processing social media influencer destination marketing campaigns. ENTER22 e-Tourism conference. Springer.
88.
OzdemirO.KolfalB.MessingerP. R.RizviS. (2023). Human or virtual: How influencer type shapes brand attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, Article 107771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107771
89.
PerdomoY. (2016). Global report on the transformative power of tourism: A paradigm shift towards a more responsible traveller. World Tourism Organization.
90.
PradhanD.DuraipandianI.SethiD. (2016). Celebrity endorsement: How celebrity-brand-user personality congruence affects brand attitude and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(5), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2014.914561
91.
PrayagG.HosanyS.MuskatB.Del ChiappaG. (2017). Understanding the relationships between tourists’ emotional experiences, perceived overall image, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515620567
92.
PuozzoI. C.AudrinC. (2021). Improving self-efficacy and creative self-efficacy to foster creativity and learning in schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100966
93.
RehmanF. U.Al-GhazaliB. M. (2022). Evaluating the influence of social advertising, individual factors, and brand image on the buying behavior toward fashion clothing brands. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221088858. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221088858
RicklyJ. M. (2022). A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 92, Article 103349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103349
97.
RobinsonB. (2020). Towards an ontology and ethics of virtual influencers. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2807
98.
RoyS.DrylW.de Araujo GilL. (2021). Celebrity endorsements in destination marketing: A three country investigation. Tourism Management, 83, Article 104213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104213
99.
SandsS.CampbellC. L.PlanggerK.FerraroC. (2022). Unreal influence: Leveraging AI in influencer marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1721–1747. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2019-0949
100.
SausengP.KlimeschW. (2008). What does phase information of oscillatory brain activity tell us about cognitive processes?Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(5), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.014
101.
SausengP.KlimeschW.SchabusM.DoppelmayrM. (2005). Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.018
102.
SchoormansJ. P.RobbenH. S. (1997). The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2–3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00008-1
103.
SheininD. A.VarkiS.AshleyC. (2011). The differential effect of ad novelty and message usefulness on brand judgments. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400301
104.
SÖKMENA.ARICIH. E.ÇALIŞKANG. (2024). Determinants of the usage of ChatGPT in the tourism and hospitality industry: A model proposal from the technology acceptance perspective. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 12(1), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2024.1398
105.
SongM.HongZ.WangY.DuanY. (2026). Friend or assistant? Matching effects between virtual influencer role types and well-being patterns based on construal level theory. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 32(2), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667241286528
106.
SongY.WangL.ZhangZ.HikkerovaL. (2024). AI or human: How endorser shapes online purchase intention?Computers in Human Behavior, 158, Article 108300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108300
107.
SorosrungruangT.AmeenN.HackleyC. (2024). How real is real enough? Unveiling the diverse power of generative AI-enabled virtual influencers and the dynamics of human responses. Psychology & Marketing, 41(12), 3124–3143. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22105
108.
ŠostarM.RistanovićV. (2023). Assessment of influencing factors on consumer behavior using the AHP model. Sustainability, 15(13), Article 10341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310341
109.
SthapitE.Del ChiappaG.CoudounarisD. N.BjörkP. (2020). Tourism experiences, memorability and behavioural intentions: A study of tourists in Sardinia, Italy. Tourism Review, 75(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2019-0102
TangD.HuL.LiH.ZhangQ.ChenA. (2013). The neural dynamics of conflict adaptation within a look-to-do transition. PLoS One, 8(2), Article e57912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057912
TauscherJ.-P.SchottkyF. W.GrogorickS.BittnerP. M.MustafaM.MagnorM. (2019). Immersive EEG: Evaluating electroencephalography in virtual reality. 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) (pp. 1794–1800). IEEE.
114.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429
115.
ToyamaM.YamadaY. (2012). The relationships among tourist novelty, familiarity, satisfaction, and destination loyalty: Beyond the novelty-familiarity continuum. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v4n6p10
116.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
117.
TropeY.LibermanN.WakslakC. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
118.
UNESCO Creative Cities Network. (2006). Towards sustainable strategies for creative tourism: Discussion report of the planning meeting for 2008 international conference on creative tourism.
119.
VadaS.PrenticeC.FilepS.KingB. (2022). The influence of travel companionships on memorable tourism experiences, well-being, and behavioural intentions. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(5), 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2533
120.
VanciaA. P. P.BăltescuC. A.BrătucuG.TecăuA. S.ChițuI. B.DuguleanăL. (2023). Examining the Disruptive Potential of Generation Z Tourists on the Travel Industry in the Digital Age. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 8756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118756
121.
WangL.LiY.-Q.RuanW.-Q.ZhangS.-N. (2025). The congruence effect in tourism activity marketing: The difference between virtual influencers and human influencers. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(21), 3522–3540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2400180
122.
WellmanM. L.StoldtR.TullyM.EkdaleB. (2020). Ethics of authenticity: Social media influencers and the production of sponsored content. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1736078
Xie-CarsonL.MagorT.BenckendorffP.HughesK. (2023). All hype or the real deal? Investigating user engagement with virtual influencers in tourism. Tourism Management, 99, Article 104779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104779
125.
YangJ.ChuenterawongP.LeeH.ChockT. M. (2023). Anthropomorphism in CSR endorsement: A comparative study on humanlike vs. cartoonlike virtual influencers’ climate change messaging. Journal of Promotion Management, 29(5), 705–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2163041
126.
YeS.WeiW.WenJ.YingT.TanX. (2021). Creating memorable experience in rural tourism: A comparison between domestic and outbound tourists. Journal of Travel Research, 60(7), 1527–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520951641
127.
YimM. Y.-C.CicchirilloV. J.DrumwrightM. E. (2012). The impact of stereoscopic three-dimensional (3-D) advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367410208
128.
YinJ.QuX.NiY. (2024). The marketing of destination distinctiveness: The power of tourism short videos with enjoyability and authenticity. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(14), 2217–2229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2242559
129.
YouL.LiuF. (2024). From virtual voices to real impact: Authenticity, altruism, and egoism in social advocacy by human and virtual influencers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, Article 123650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123650
130.
ZhangH.XuH. (2024). Good match, deep love: Three studies examining the celebrity endorsement’s influence on destination brand love. Journal of Travel Research, 63(3), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231164968
131.
ZhangJ.ShaoZ.WangK. (2025). Does your company have the right influencer? Influencer type and tourism brand personality. Tourism Management, 107, Article 105079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105079
132.
ZhangK.SunX.LiG. (2025). Virtual influencer and cultural heritage destination: Endorsement effectiveness of virtual versus human influencers. Annals of Tourism Research, 110, Article 103873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103873
133.
ZhangY.ShaoZ.ZhangJ.WuB.ZhouL. (2024). The effect of image enhancement on influencer’s product recommendation effectiveness: The roles of perceived influencer authenticity and post type. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 18(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-09-2022-0286
134.
ZhouY.LiY.-Q.RuanW.-Q.ZhangS.-N.YangT.-T. (2024). Who should the spotlight be on? The interactive effects of celebrity endorser type and destination personality. Tourism Management, 105, Article 104957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104957
135.
ZhuC.Hoc Nang FongL.GaoH.BuhalisD.ShangZ. (2022). How does celebrity involvement influence travel intention? The case of promoting Chengdu on TikTok. Information Technology & Tourism, 24(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-022-00233-w
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
