The Effects of Psychological Ownership of Tourism Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) on Tourist Behavioral Outcomes

Abstract

Digital technology has reshaped the concept of ownership in the digital realm. This study explores non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as innovative offerings from heritage sites, focusing on how psychological ownership of these digital assets influences tourists’ real-world behaviors. Four scenario-based experiments across different cultural heritage contexts demonstrate that psychological ownership of tourism NFTs (high-level vs. low-level) influences tourists’ visit intention and stewardship behavioral intentions. The mechanism involves the transfer of psychological ownership from tourism NFTs (the proximal target) to the original cultural heritage (the distal target), which subsequently leads to increased cultural heritage attachment. Furthermore, these effects are attenuated for individuals with a low construal level. These findings advance current knowledge on psychological ownership and NFT implementations in heritage tourism while providing practical guidance for heritage organizations to leverage NFTs.

Keywords

non-fungible tokens (NFTs)digital collectibles psychological ownership cultural heritage stewardship behavioral intentions construal level theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AbedRabbo

AlMalak

Ellis-Chadwick

Oliveira

(2025). Luxury Fashion Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs): Drivers of Ownership and Spillover Effect on Physical Luxury Products. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(6), 3062–3081. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70040

Ali

Momin

Shrestha

Das

Alhajj

Dwivedi

Y. K.

(2023). A review of the key challenges of non-fungible tokens. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, Article 122248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122248

Anton

C. E.

Lawrence

(2016). The relationship between place attachment, the theory of planned behaviour and residents’ response to place change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.010

Atasoy

Morewedge

C. K.

(2018). Digital goods are valued less than physical goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx102

Bardhi

Eckhardt

G. M.

(2017). Liquid Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx050

Baxter

W. L.

Aurisicchio

Childs

P. R. N.

(2015). A psychological ownership approach to designing object attachment. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(4–6), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1030371

Belk

Humayun

Brouard

(2022). Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and Wild Markets. Journal of Business Research, 153, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.031

Boukis

(2024). The effect of tokenized rewards on customer loyalty programs. Annals of Tourism Research, 109, Article 103851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103851

Buhalis

Leung

Lin

(2023). Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing. Tourism Management, 97, Article 104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104724

10.

Cai

Wang

Y.-C.

Zhang

C. (Christina). (2025). Does metaverse stimulate tourism prosocial behavior? A mindfulness-driven model with a psychological ownership perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(4), 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-08-2023-1130

11.

Chen

(2024). Exploring the role of psychological ownership in tourists’ shift toward sustainable behavior in cultural tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(11), 2403–2422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2341890

12.

Chen

X.-J.

Zhou

Zhang

C.-M.

(2024). Investigating the impact of digital collectibles involvement on tourists’ on-sites visit intentions. Current Psychology, 43(13), 11651–11662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05287-5

13.

Cheng

C.-K.

Kuo

H.-Y.

(2015). Bonding to a new place never visited: Exploring the relationship between landscape elements and place bonding. Tourism Management, 46, 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.006

14.

China Insights Industry Research Institute. (2025, July 12). The 2025–2030 China Digital Culture and Tourism Industry Investment Outlook & Supply–Demand Forecast Report. https://www.chinairn.com/report/20250211/172516123.html?id=1915563&name=XuYuWei

15.

Claus

Eelen

Warlop

(2025). This tree in the forest is mine: The effect of concreteness on psychological ownership. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.05.003

16.

Cohen

T. R.

Panter

A. T.

Turan

Morse

Kim

(2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037245

17.

Danckwerts

Kenning

(2019). “It’s MY Service, it’s MY Music”: The role of psychological ownership in music streaming consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 36(9), 803–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21213

18.

Euronews. (2025 July 20). The French city of Cannes has sold its landmarks as NFTs and made €330,000. https://www.euronews.com/culture/2022/06/22/the-french-city-of-cannes-has-sold-its-landmarks-as-nfts-and-made-330000

19.

Fenigstein

Scheier

M. F.

Buss

A. H.

(1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076760

20.

Fortagne

M. A.

Lis

(2024). Determinants of the purchase intention of non-fungible token collectibles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 1032–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2264

21.

Gifford

Nilsson

(2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034

22.

Gong

Huang

Liu

(2025). A socio-ecological perspective on drivers and inhibitors of purchasing NFTs in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2025.2495061

23.

Goodman

J. K.

Malkoc

S. A.

(2012). Choosing here and now versus there and later: The moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preferences. J. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1086/665047

24.

Hadi

Melumad

Park

E. S.

(2024). The Metaverse: A new digital frontier for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1356

25.

Halpenny

E. A.

(2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.006

26.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100

27.

Liu

Yang

. (2022). The development of digital collection platform under responsible innovation framework: A study on China’s non-fungible token (NFT) industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 203.

28.

Henderson

M. D.

(2013). When seeing the forest reduces the need for trees: the role of construal level in attraction to choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.001

29.

Hernandez

(2012). Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0363

30.

Hosany

Buzova

Sanz-Blas

(2020). The influence of place attachment, ad-evoked positive affect, and motivation on intention to visit: Imagination proclivity as a moderator. Journal of Travel Research, 59(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519830789

31.

Ioannidis

Kontis

A.-P.

(2023). Metaverse for tourists and tourism destinations. Information Technology & Tourism, 25(4), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-023-00271-y

32.

Jami

Kouchaki

Gino

(2021). I own, so I help out: How psychological ownership increases prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(5), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa040

33.

Jussila

Tarkiainen

Sarstedt

Hair

J. F.

(2015). Individual psychological ownership: Concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002330

34.

Kamleitner

Feuchtl

(2015). “As if it were mine”: Imagery works by inducing psychological ownership. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2015.1002337

35.

Kim

Ryoo

Kim

(2025). Self-Discrepancy as a Motive for Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Acquisition: A Psychological Ownership Perspective. Journal of Advertising, 54(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2024.2441310

36.

Kock

Berbekova

Assaf

A. G.

(2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, Article 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330

37.

Lee

C.-K.

Ahmad

M. S.

Petrick

J. F.

Park

Y.-N.

Park

Kang

C.-W.

(2020). The roles of cultural worldview and authenticity in tourists’ decision-making process in a heritage tourism destination using a model of goal-directed behavior. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 18, Article 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100500

38.

Lermer

Streicher

Sachs

Raue

Frey

(2015). The effect of construal level on risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2067

39.

Liang

Huang

Shen

Law

(2024). Evaluating tourist perceptions of architectural heritage values at a World Heritage Site in South-East China: The case of Gulangyu Island. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 60, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.06.018

40.

Liburd

J. J.

Becken

(2020). Values in nature conservation, tourism and UNESCO World Heritage Site stewardship. In Protected areas, sustainable tourism and neo-liberal governance policies (pp. 23–39). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1293067

41.

Lin

Hong

W. C. H.

Xiao

(2024). Slowing down in “Little Shanghai”: A nostalgia-induced framework of reciprocity between psychological ownership and heritage preservation. Journal of Travel Research, 63(4), 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231171678

42.

Lin

Wong

I. A.

Zhang

Chen

(2022). Longing for the heritage treasure: Reconnecting the self and the heritage site through nostalgic reminiscences and psychological ownership. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 39(3), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2022.2089953

43.

Liu

Zhang

(2023). Authenticity, psychological ownership and tourist commitment in heritage tourism: The moderating effect of cultural intelligence. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(24), 3955–3972. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2153650

44.

Lyu

Jiang

Balaji

M. S.

(2023). Travelers’ psychological ownership: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Travel Research, 62(8), 1623–1646. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231151395

45.

Manetti

Bellucci

Oliva

Cesa Bianchi

(2024). Art-based religious tourism after the pandemic: innovations in sustainable tourism or return to precrisis business models? Current Issues in Tourism, 27(22), 3732–3753. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2272729

46.

Mardon

Denegri-Knott

Molesworth

(2023). “Kind of mine, kind of not”: Digital possessions and affordance misalignment. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucac057

47.

Milligan

M. J.

(1998). Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic Interaction, 21(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1998.21.1.1

48.

Morewedge

C. K.

(2021). Psychological ownership: implicit and explicit. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.10.003

49.

Morewedge

C. K.

Monga

Palmatier

R. W.

Shu

S. B.

Small

D. A.

(2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920957007

50.

Nguyen

Grinfeld

Liberman

Wakslak

C. J.

(2023). Effects of temporal distance on a dynamic measure of action identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 108, Article 104493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104493

51.

Nijs

Martinovic

Verkuyten

(2024). The two routes of collective psychological ownership: Rights and responsibilities explain intentions to exclude outsiders and engage in stewardship behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(2), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221129757

52.

Onder

Treiblmaier

(2023). Transforming tourism and hospitality: The innovative potential of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). In Onder

Acikgoz

(Eds.), Blockchain for tourism and hospitality industries (pp. 51–65). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003351917-5

53.

Park

Kim

(2025). Psychological ownership of avatars in the metaverse: Its key antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(1), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2417

54.

Peck

Kirk

C. P.

Luangrath

A. W.

Shu

S. B.

(2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920952084

55.

Peck

Luangrath

A. W.

(2023). A review and future avenues for psychological ownership in consumer research. Consumer Psychology Review, 6(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1084

56.

Peck

Shu

S. B.

(2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614

57.

Peng

Pierce

(2015). Job-and organization-based psychological ownership: Relationship and outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-07-2012-0201

58.

People’s Daily. (2026, February 14). NFTs featuring Chinese culture heat up as Chinese Lunar New Year nears. https://en.people.cn/n3/2022/0128/c90000-9950951.html

59.

Peres

Schreier

Schweidel

D. A.

Sorescu

(2023). Blockchain meets marketing: Opportunities, threats, and avenues for future research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.08.001

60.

Pierce

J. L.

Kostova

Dirks

K. T.

(2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028

61.

Preston

S. D.

Gelman

S. A.

(2020). This land is my land: Psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, Article 101443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101443

62.

Rashid Saeed

Khan

Lee

Lockshin

Bellman

Cohen

Yang

(2024). Construal level theory in advertising research: A systematic review and directions for future research. Journal of Business Research, 183, Article 114870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114870

63.

Rosenberg

(1979). Conceiving the self (p. 318). Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340091

64.

Ruan

W.-Q.

Wang

M.-Y.

Zhang

S.-N.

Y.-Q.

(2024). Knowledge-based or affection-based? The influence mechanism of heritage tourism interpretation content on tourists’ willingness to inherit culture. Tourism Management, 102, Article 104876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104876

65.

Shu

S. B.

Peck

(2011). Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002

66.

Stylos

Bellou

Andronikidis

Vassiliadis

C. A.

(2017). Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists. Tourism Management, 60, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.11.006

67.

Huang

(2024). Does destination nostalgic advertising enhance tourists’ intentions to visit? The moderating role of destination type. Tourism Management, 100, Article 104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104810

68.

Sung

Kwon

Sohn

(2023). NFT luxury brand marketing in the metaverse: Leveraging blockchain-certified NFTs to drive consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 40(11), 2306–2325. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21854

69.

Thomson

MacInnis

D. J.

Whan Park

(2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10

70.

Treiblmaier

(2021). The token economy as a key driver for tourism: Entering the next phase of blockchain research. Annals of Tourism Research, 91, Article 103177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103177

71.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

72.

Trope

Liberman

Wakslak

(2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70013-x

73.

Vallacher

R. R.

Wegner

D. M.

(1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660

74.

Wang

M.-Y.

Y.-Q.

Ruan

W.-Q.

Zhang

S.-N.

Zhang

K.-F.

(2025). To understand or to touch? Evoking tourists’ cultural preservation commitment through heritage tourism interpretation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(1), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2316299

75.

Wang

Fielding

K. S.

Dean

A. J.

(2022). Psychological ownership of nature: A conceptual elaboration and research agenda. Biological Conservation, 267, Article 109477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109477

76.

Watkins

R. D.

Sellen

Lindley

S. E.

(2015). Digital collections and digital collecting practices [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.270238

77.

Williams

D. R.

Vaske

J. J.

(2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.6.830

78.

Chen

Xin

(2025). The antecedents and consequences of tourists’ psychological ownership: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2025.2525525

79.

Xue

Wang

(2025). Trend of owning the intangible: the mediating role of psychological ownership in cultural consumption within blockchain ecosystems. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05286-w

80.

Xue

Zhang

(2020). The effect of distance on tourist behavior: A study based on social media data. Annals of Tourism Research, 82, Article 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102916

81.

Zhang

(2019). Impact of destination psychological ownership on residents’ “place citizenship behavior.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 14, Article 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100391

82.

Zhao

Zhan

(2024). Investigating the impact of cultural tourism NFTs’ perceived value and experiential evaluation on WOM of a tourism destination: A generational difference moderation approach [Conference session]. In Wuhan International Conference on E-business. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60260-3_3

83.

Zhao

Zhan

Long

(2025). Leveraging NFTs for destination brand love: the roles of gratifications, cultural contact and destination image. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2025-0624

84.

Zhou

Liu

. (2023). Is cash perceived as more valuable than digital money? The mediating effect of psychological ownership and psychological distance. Marketing Letters, 34(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-022-09624-9

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.92 MB

0.00 MB