Guide dogs, as working animals assisting individuals with visual impairments, significantly enhance their travel experiences. However, the dimensions and influencing factors of memorable travel experiences when traveling with guide dogs remain underexplored. This study, grounded in attachment theory, analyzed 200 videos of interactions between individuals with visual impairments and guide dogs, 20 semi-structured interviews, and 124 survey questionnaires (including 56 pre-survey and 68 formal survey responses). The findings reveal that memorable travel experiences for guide dog users are composed of three-party social experiences, emotional experiences with the guide dog, environmental perception experiences, and therapeutic experiences. Influencing factors include human-dog compensatory factors, destination contextual factors, and cognitive factors. Using fsQCA, two effective conditional configurations were identified, confirming that no single factor alone can lead to memorable travel experiences. The study provides practical insights for improving travel environments for guide dog users, including public education on guide dogs, enhancing destination inclusivity.
BarnesS. J.MattssonJ.SørensenF. (2016). Remembered experiences and revisit intentions: A longitudinal study of safari park visitors. Tourism Management, 57, 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.014
BrethertonI.MunhollandK. A.CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (2008). Internal working models in attachment relationships. The Guilford Press.
5.
CastroG. M. D.Delgado-VerdeM.Amores-SalvadóJ.Navas-LópezJ. E. (2013). Linking human, technological, and relational assets to technological innovation: exploring a new approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.8
ChanV. H. T.TungV. W. S. (2023). Traveling with pets: Investigating the urban, staycation tourism experience. Journal of China Tourism Research, 19(4), 725–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2022.2125469
8.
CharmazK.BelgraveL. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In GubriumJ. F. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (Vol. 2, pp. 347–365). Sage.
9.
ChungJ. Y.LeeH. (2019). Desired recreation companionship and travel behaviour of people with disabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1564343
10.
CoelhoM. D. F.GoslingM. D. S.AlmeidaA. S. A. D. (2018). Tourism experiences: Core processes of memorable trips. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.08.004
11.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00988593
12.
CraigonP. J.Hobson-WestP.EnglandG. C. W.WhelanC.LethbridgeE.AsherL. (2017). “She’s a dog at the end of the day”: Guide dog owners’ perspectives on the behaviour of their guide dog. PLoS One, 12(4), e0176018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176018
13.
DanielsM. J.HarmonL. K.BrayleyR. E.VeseR.ParkM.(2019). Honor flight: Recognition of preeminent-mature tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 74, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.10.006
14.
DarcyS.CameronB.PeggS. (2010). Accessible tourism and sustainability: A discussion and case study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003690668
FanD. X. F.TsaurS. H.LinJ. H.ChangT. Y.TsaY. R. T. (2022). Tourist intercultural competence: A multidimensional measurement and its impact on tourist active participation and memorable cultural experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520982372
Florido-BenítezL. (2024). The accessibility of beaches for blind people and their guide dogs: Accessible tourism and inclusion in Spain. Tourism Review, 79(3), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-05-2023-0302
19.
FraleyR. C.DavisK. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x
20.
GarrodB.FennellD. A. (2023). Strategic approaches to accessible ecotourism: Small steps, the domino effect and not paving paradise. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(3), 760–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.2016778
21.
GaunetF.BesseS. (2019). Guide dogs’ navigation after a single journey: A descriptive study of path reproduction, homing, shortcut and detour. PLoS One, 14(7), e0219816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219816
22.
GiulianiM. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In BonnesM.LeeT.BonaiutoM. (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137–172). Aldershot.
23.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2017). Theoretical sampling. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), Sociological methods (pp. 105–114). Routledge.
24.
GlenkL. M.PřibylováL.StetinaB. U.DemirelS.WeissenbacherK. (2019). Perceptions on health benefits of guide dog ownership in an Austrian population of blind people with and without a guide dog. Animals, 9(7), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070428
GravrokJ.HowellT.BendrupsD.BennettP. (2018). Adapting the traditional guide dog model to enable vision-impaired adolescents to thrive. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 24, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.01.003
27.
HallS. S.MacMichaelJ.TurnerA.MillsD. S. (2017). A survey of the impact of owning a service dog on quality of life for individuals with physical and hearing disability: A pilot study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15, 59–9.
28.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
29.
HershM. (2022). Wearable travel aids for blind and partially sighted people: A review with a focus on design issues. Sensors, 22(14), 5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145454
30.
HosanyS.SthapitE.BjörkP. (2022). Memorable tourism experience: A review and research agenda. Psychology and Marketing, 39(8), 1467–1486. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21665
31.
HosseiniS.Cortes MaciasR.Almeida GarciaF. (2023). Memorable tourism experience research: A systematic review of the literature. Tourism Recreation Research, 48(3), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.1922206
32.
HuangL.LauN. (2020). Enhancing the smart tourism experience for people with visual impairments by gamified application approach through needs analysis in Hong Kong. Sustainability, 12(15), 6213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156213
JensenM. T.ChambersD.WilsonS. (2023). The future of deaf tourism studies: An interdisciplinary research agenda. Annals of Tourism Research, 100, 103549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103549
36.
JiangS.MoyleB.YungR.TaoL.ScottN. (2023). Augmented reality and the enhancement of memorable tourism experiences at heritage sites. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(2), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2026303
37.
KastenholzE.EusébioC.FigueiredoE. (2015). Contributions of tourism to social inclusion of persons with disability. Disability & Society, 30(8), 1259–1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1075868
38.
KimH.ChenJ. S. (2019). The memorable travel experience and its reminiscence functions. Journal of Travel Research, 58(4), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518772366
39.
KimJ. H.Badu-BaidenF.KimS.KoseogluM. A.BaahN. G. (2024). Evolution of the memorable tourism experience and future research prospects. Journal of Travel Research, 63(6), 1315–1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231206545
40.
KimJ. H.RitchieJ. R. B. (2014). Cross-cultural validation of a memorable tourism experience scale (MTES). Journal of Travel Research, 53(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513496468
41.
KimJ. H.RitchieJ. R. B.McCormickB. (2012). Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510385467
42.
KimY.RibeiroM. A.LiG. (2022). Tourism memory characteristics scale: Development and validation. Journal of Travel Research, 61(6), 1308–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211033355
43.
KodaN.KuboM.IshigamiT.FuruhashiH. (2011). Assessment of dog guides by users in Japan and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(10), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1110501006
44.
KongW. H.LoiK. I. (2017). The barriers to holiday-taking for visually impaired tourists and their families. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 32, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.06.001
45.
KrausS.Ribeiro-SorianoD.SchüsslerM. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 15–33.
46.
KwongM. J.BartholomewK. (2011). “Not just a dog”: An attachment perspective on relationships with assistance dogs. Attachment & Human Development, 13(5), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2011.584410
47.
LamK. L.ChanC. S.PetersM. (2020). Understanding technological contributions to accessible tourism from the perspective of destination design for visually impaired visitors in Hong Kong. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 17, 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100434
48.
LawsonA.BeckettA. E. (2020). The social and human rights models of disability: Towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533
49.
LehtoX.LuoW.MiaoL.GhiselliR. F. (2018). Shared tourism experience of individuals with disabilities and their caregivers. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.04.001
50.
LevyK. N.BlattS. J.ShaverP. R. (1998). Attachment styles and parental representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.407
51.
LourensH.WatermeyerB.SwartzL. (2019). Ties that bind, and double-bind: visual impairment, help, and the shaping of relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(16), 1890–1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1450454
52.
LubinA.DekaD. (2012). Role of public transportation as job access mode: Lessons from survey of people with disabilities in New Jersey. Transportation Research Record, 2277(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.3141/2277-11
53.
ManduchiR.KurniawanS. (2010). Watch your head, mind your step: mobility-related accidents experienced by people with visual impairment. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Tech. Rep, 1.
54.
MatsunakaK.KodaN. (2008). Acceptance of dog guides and daily stress levels of dog guide users and nonusers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(5), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x0810200505
55.
McClimensA.PartridgeN.SextonE. (2014). How do people with learning disability experience the city centre? A Sheffield case study. Health & Place, 28, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.02.014
McIverS.HallS.MillsD. S. (2020). The impact of owning a guide dog on owners’ quality of life: A longitudinal study. Anthrozoös, 33(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1694315
58.
McKercherB.DarcyS. (2018). Re-conceptualizing barriers to travel by people with disabilities. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.01.003
MuñozK. E.ArellanoP. A.BarrocaA. M.De CastroJ. M.EncarnacionC. J.IgnacioJ. (2025). Through their lens: A visual inquiry into people with disabilities’ memorable tourism experience. Journal of Vacation Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667251382410
61.
NoghanN.O’ConnorP.SigalaM. (2024). Accessible tourism: how people with vision impairment and blindness experience tourism and “see” the invisible. Tourism Review, 79(7), 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-06-2023-0408
62.
PantelidisC.Tom DieckM. C.JungT. H.SmithP.MillerA. (2024). Place attachment theory and virtual reality: The case of a rural tourism destination. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(11), 3704–3727. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-09-2023-1489
63.
PappasI. O.WoodsideA. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
64.
ParkS.SantosC. A. (2017). Exploring the tourist experience: A sequential approach. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515624017
65.
PattersonM. E.WilliamsD. R. (2005). Maintaining research traditions on place: Diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.001
66.
PembertonN. (2019). Cocreating guide dog partnerships: Dog training and interdependence in 1930s America. Medical Humanities, 45(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011626
67.
Prato-PrevideE.Basso RicciE.ColomboE. S. (2022). The complexity of the human-animal bond: Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism in human-animal relationships and animal hoarding. Animals, 12(20), 2835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202835
68.
QiaoG.CaoY.ZhangJ. (2023). Accessible Tourism – understanding blind and vision-impaired tourists’ behaviour towards inclusion. Tourism Review, 78(2), 531–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-03-2022-0129
QiaoG.ShaoZ.GuJ.ChenX. (2026). Accessible tourism for tourists with visual impairment: The role of auditory perception in shaping behavioral attitudes. Tourism Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-08-2025-0902
71.
QiaoG.SongH.PrideauxB.HuangS. (2023). The “unseen” tourism: Travel experience of people with visual impairment. Annals of Tourism Research, 99, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103542
72.
QiaoG.XuJ.DingL.ChenQ. (2023). The impact of volunteer interaction on the tourism experience of people with visual impairment based on a mixed approach. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(17), 2794–2811. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2098093
73.
QuinteroC. (2022). A review: Accessible technology through participatory design. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 17(4), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1785564
74.
RamuluP. Y.van LandinghamS. W.MassofR. W.ChanE. S.FerrucciL.FriedmanD. S. (2012). Fear of falling and visual field loss from glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 119(7), 1352–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.037
75.
RasoolimaneshS. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM.OlyaH. (2021). The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1571–1592. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2020-1164
RicklyJ. M.HalpernN.HansenM.WelsmanJ. (2021). Travelling with a guide dog: Experiences of people with vision impairment. Sustainability, 13(5), 2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052840
78.
RicklyJ. M.HalpernN.HansenM.WelsmanJ. (2022). Traveling with a guide dog: Confidence, constraints and affective qualities of the human-guide dog relationship. Tourism Management, 93, 104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104617
79.
RobersonP. N. E.SaboM.WickelK. (2011). Internal working models of attachment and postdivorce coparent relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 52(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2011.569442
80.
RockettB.CarrS. (2014). Animals and attachment theory. Society and Animals, 22(4), 415–433.
81.
RooneyN. J.ClarkC. C. A.CaseyR. A. (2016). Minimizing fear and anxiety in working dogs: A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 16, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.11.001
82.
SieL.PeggS.PhelanK. V. (2021). Senior tourists’ self-determined motivations, tour preferences, memorable experiences and subjective well-being: An integrative hierarchical model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.03.006
83.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. E. (1998). Attachment theory and close relationships. The Guilford Press.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Sage.
86.
SuL.ChengJ.SwansonS. R. (2020). The impact of tourism activity type on emotion and storytelling: The moderating roles of travel companion presence and relative ability. Tourism Management, 81, 104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104138
87.
SurmiakA. D. (2018). Confidentiality in qualitative research involving vulnerable participants: Researchers’ perspectives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), 3099. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099
88.
TangJ.YingT.YeS. (2022). Chinese pet owners traveling with pets: Motivation-based segmentation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.12.006
89.
TaoC. B.LinZ. C.ZhangX. (2025). Unlocking eudaimonic well-being: The transformative power of memorable travel experiences for people with physical disabilities. Tourism Management, 109, 105135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105135
90.
TasciA. D. A.UsluA.StylidisD.WoosnamK. M. (2022). Place-oriented or people-oriented concepts for destination loyalty: Destination image and place attachment versus perceived distances and emotional solidarity. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520982377
91.
TungV. W. S.LinP.Qiu ZhangH.ZhaoA. (2017). A framework of memory management and tourism experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(7), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1260521
92.
TungV. W. S.RitchieJ. R. B. (2011). Investigating the memorable experiences of the senior travel market: An examination of the reminiscence bump. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2011.563168
93.
ValentineD. P.KiddooM.LaFleurB. (1993). Psychosocial implications of service dog ownership for people who have mobility or hearing impairments. Social Work in Health Care, 19(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v19n01_07
94.
VerschuerenK.MarcoenA.SchoefsV. (1996). The internal working model of the self, attachment, and competence in five-year-olds. Child Development, 67(5), 2493–2511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01870.x
WongJ. Y.LaiT. C. (2015). Celebrity attachment and behavioral intentions: The mediating role of place attachment. International Journal of Tourism Research, 17(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1974
97.
YeungP.TowersA.La GrowS.PhilippM.AlpassF.StephensC. (2015). Mobility, satisfaction with functional capacity and perceived quality of life (PQOL) in older persons with self-reported visual impairment: The pathway between ability to get around and PQOL. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.910559
98.
ZhaoX.Lynch JrJ. G. ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
99.
ZhengY.WeiW.LineN.ZhangL. (2021). Integrating the tourist gaze with the social servicescape: Implications for creating memorable theme park experiences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93, 102782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102782
100.
Zilcha-ManoS.MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2011). An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.04.001
101.
ZimmermannP. (1999). Structure and functions of internal working models of attachment and their role for emotion regulation. Attachment & Human Development, 1(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616739900134161
