Urban and nature visuals are ubiquitous in tourism marketing. Although most research documents a “nature-superiority” pattern, the influence of urban imagery on marketing effectiveness remains underexplored. We propose that, relative to nature, urban visuals increase preference for high-construal messages by heightening the need for eudaimonic well-being—a need left unmet under urban exposure. Across five studies manipulating destination visuals (urban vs. nature) and message construal, we consistently find evidence for this effect. These findings refine the nature–urban dichotomy and extend Construal Level Theory beyond its traditional emphasis on psychological distance. Practically, they offer actionable guidance for optimizing the use of urban and nature visuals in tourism campaigns.
AucklandM. E.CaveK. R.DonnellyN. (2007). Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194073
2.
BallewM. T.OmotoA. M. (2018). Absorption: How nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology, 10(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2017.0044
3.
BaskinE.WakslakC. J.TropeY.NovemskyN. (2014). Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/675737
4.
ByunJ.JangS. (2015). Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type. Tourism Management, 50, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.005
5.
CannifordR.ShankarA. (2013). Purifying practices: How consumers assemble romantic experiences of nature. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1086/667202
6.
CannonH. M.YaprakA. (2002). Will the real-world citizen please stand up! The many faces of cosmopolitan consumer behavior. Journal of International Marketing, 10(4), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.10.4.30.19550
7.
CarpenterT. P.PogacarR.PulligC.KourilM.AguilarS.LaBouffJ.IsenbergN.ChakroffA. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2194–2208. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3
8.
ChangY.DuranteK. M. (2022). Why consumers have everything but happiness: An evolutionary mismatch perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101347
FilepS.MoyleB. D.SkavronskayaL. (2024). Tourist wellbeing: Re-thinking hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(1), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221087964
11.
FisherR.AckermanD. (1998). The effects of recognition and group need on volunteerism: A social norm perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/209538
12.
FurnhamA.HendersonM. (1982). The good, the bad and the mad: Response bias in self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 3(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(82)90051-4
13.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464
14.
GuéguenN.StefanJ. (2016). “Green altruism” short immersion in natural green environments and helping behavior. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514536576
15.
HanD.DuhachekA.AgrawalN. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1086/678300
16.
HanksL.ZhangL.LineN.McGinleyS. (2016). When less is more: Sustainability messaging, destination type, and processing fluency. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 58, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.07.002
17.
HannaP.WijesingheS.PaliatsosI.WalkerC.AdamsM.KimbuA. (2019). Active engagement with nature: Outdoor adventure tourism, sustainability and wellbeing. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(9), 1355–1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1621883
18.
HartmannP.ApaolazaV.AlijaP. (2013). Nature imagery in advertising: Attention restoration and memory effects. International Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.2501/ija-32-2-183-210
19.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process Analysis – A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
20.
HirschmanE. C.HolbrookM. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600314
21.
HutaV. (2015). The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice. In JosephS. (Ed.), Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life (pp. 159–182). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118996874.ch10
22.
JiaL.YangX.JiangY. (2022). The pet exposure effect: Exploring the differential impact of dogs versus cats on consumer mindsets. Journal of Marketing, 86(5), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221078036
23.
JoyeY.BolderdijkJ. W.KösterM. A. F.PiffP. K. (2020). A diminishment of desire: Exposure to nature relative to urban environments dampens materialism. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126783
24.
JoyeY.KösterM.LangeF.FischerM.MoorsA. (2024). A goal-discrepancy account of restorative nature experiences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102192
25.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
26.
KassinisG.PanayiotouA. (2018). Visuality as greenwashing: The case of BP and deepwater horizon. Organization & Environment, 31(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616687014
27.
KimJ.KimP. B.KimJ. E.MagniniV. P. (2016). Application of construal-level theory to promotional strategies in the hotel industry. Journal of Travel Research, 55(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514550097
28.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.PierroA.MannettiL. (2002). When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.648
29.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
LiF.MaJ. (2023). The effectiveness of the destination logo: Congruity effect between logo typeface and destination stereotypes. Tourism Management, 98, 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104772
33.
LiF.MaJ. (2024). The effect of implied motion in travel photographs on visit intention: The mediating role of mental imagery. Tourism Management, 104, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104919
34.
LiH.CaoY. (2022). Exposure to nature leads to a stronger natural-is-better bias in Chinese people. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101752
LiuJ.XuX.WangL. (2024). How do travel experience sharing type, tourism activity type, and temporal distance shape online viewers’ travel intentions? An application of construal level theory. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2214357
38.
LiY.WanL. C. (2025). Inspiring tourists’ imagination: How and when human presence in photographs enhances travel mental simulation and destination attractiveness. Tourism Management, 106, 104969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104969
39.
LuoX.WanL. C.LiuX. S. (2023). HARNESSING ROMANCE: The effect of exposure to romance-themed attractions on tourists’ impulsive buying. Tourism Management, 96, 104717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104717
40.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00251-7
41.
MarvierM.KareivaP.FelixD.FerranteB. J.BillingtonM. B. (2023). The benefits of nature exposure: The need for research that better informs implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(44), e2304126120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304126120
42.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M.Bruehlman-SenecalE.DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745
43.
McGregorI.LittleB. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.2.494
44.
MeadN. L.WilliamsL. E. (2022). Can't buy me meaning? Lay theories impede people from deriving meaning and well-being from consumption. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101332
45.
MehmetogluM. (2007). Typologising nature-based tourists by activity—Theoretical and practical implications. Tourism Management, 28(3), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.02.006
46.
MengL.BieY.YangM.WangY. (2025). The effect of human versus virtual influencers: The roles of destination types and self-referencing processes. Tourism Management, 106, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104978
47.
MoorsA.BoddezY.De HouwerJ. (2017). The power of goal-directed processes in the causation of emotional and other actions. Emotion Review, 9(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669595
48.
MorrisonA. M. (2018). Marketing and managing tourism destinations. Routledge.
49.
MouratidisK. (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229
50.
O’GuinnT. C.TannerR. J.MaengA. (2015). Turning to space: Social density, social class, and the value of things in stores. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv010
51.
PearceK.HutaV.VoloacaM. (2021). How eudaimonic and hedonic orientations map onto seeing beyond the ‘me, now, and tangible’. Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(5), 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1791943
PritchardA.RichardsonM.SheffieldD.McEwanK. (2019). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(3), 1145–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
RobinsonJ. M.JorgensenA.CameronR.BrindleyP. (2020). Let nature be thy medicine: A socioecological exploration of green prescribing in the UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3460. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103460
56.
RussellR.GuerryA. D.BalvaneraP.GouldR. K.BasurtoX.ChanK. M. A.KlainS.LevineJ.TamJ. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38(1), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838
57.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
58.
SackettA. M.MeyvisT.NelsonL. D.ConverseB. A.SackettA. L. (2010). You’re having fun when time flies: The hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychological Science, 21(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609354832
59.
SinhaJ.LuF.-C. (2019). Ignored or rejected: Retail exclusion effects on construal levels and consumer responses to compensation. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz021
60.
SrnkaK. J.KoeszegiS. T. (2007). From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59, 29–57.
61.
SuL.TangB.NawijnJ. (2021). How tourism activity shapes travel experience sharing: Tourist well-being and social context. Annals of Tourism Research, 91, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103316
62.
SuL.YeC.HuangY. (2024). Does destination nostalgic advertising enhance tourists’ intentions to visit? The moderating role of destination type. Tourism Management, 100, 104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104810
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7
68.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.94.1.3
69.
WanE. W.AgrawalN. (2011). Carryover effects of self-control on decision making: A construal-level perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/658471
70.
WangJ.ZouP.YuB. (2024). How online exposure to nature affects customer engagement: Evidence from Sina Weibo. Electronic Markets, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00728-w
71.
WedelM.PietersR. (2007). Visual marketing: From attention to action. Psychology Press.
WhiteM. P.AlcockI.GrellierJ.WheelerB. W.HartigT.WarberS. L.BoneA.DepledgeM. H.FlemingL. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 7730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3
74.
WhiteM. P.PahlS.WheelerB. W.DepledgeM. H.FlemingL. E. (2017). Natural environments and subjective wellbeing: Different types of exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health & Place, 45, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.008
75.
WolchJ. R.ByrneJ.NewellJ. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
76.
XuD.ChenT.PearceJ.MohammadiZ.PearceP. L. (2021). Reaching audiences through travel vlogs: The perspective of involvement. Tourism Management, 86, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104326
77.
YamimA. P.MaiR.WerleC. O. C.KirmaniA.ReczekR. W. (2020). Make it hot? How food temperature (mis)guides product judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(4), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa017
78.
YangY.SedikidesC.WangY.CaiH. (2024). Nature nurtures authenticity: Mechanisms and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126, 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000432
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
