The role of heritage interpretation in cultural inheritance is increasingly recognized, yet how different types of heritage anthropomorphic interpretation affect tourists’ cultural inheritance intention remains unclear. Based on four experiments, this study explores the effects of heritage anthropomorphic interpretation (imagery, verbal, and integrated) on tourists’ cultural inheritance intention. Our findings include: (1) Heritage anthropomorphic interpretation enhances cultural inheritance intention, with the integrated type outperforming the imagery type, but not the verbal type. (2) Cultural involvement mediates the relationship between heritage anthropomorphic interpretation and cultural inheritance intention. (3) Situational awe moderates this relationship—under low awe, the imagery type is more effective than other types, whereas no significant differences emerge under high awe. This study introduces an anthropomorphic perspective to heritage interpretation and identifies the impacts of differentiated interpretation types on cultural inheritance intention. It extends dual coding and meaning transfer theories and contributes to effective interpretation design strategies.
BaiY.MaruskinL. A.ChenS.GordonA. M.StellarJ. E.McNeilG. D.PengK.KeltnerD. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000087
2.
CaiS.LinD.XiaoH. (2025). The collision of tradition and fashion: How anthropomorphizing museum exhibits influences cultural inheritance. Tourism Management, 109(4), 105133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105133
3.
ChengT. M.WuH. C. (2015). How do environmental knowledge, environmental sensitivity, and place attachment affect environmentally responsible behavior? An integrated approach for sustainable island tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.965177
4.
Ching-YuanH.Chia-JungC.Pei-ChingL. (2010). Involvement theory in constructing bloggers’ intention to purchase travel products. Tourism Management, 31(4), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.003
5.
ClarkJ. M.PaivioA. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01320076
6.
DansE. P.GonzálezP. A. (2019). Sustainable tourism and social value at World Heritage Sites: Towards a conservation plan for Altamira, Spain. Annals of Tourism Research, 74(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.10.011
7.
d’AstousA.LandrevilleV. (2003). An experimental investigation of factors affecting consumers’ perceptions of sales promotions. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1746–1761. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495447
8.
DingA.LeeR. H.LegendreT. S.MaderaJ. (2022). Anthropomorphism in hospitality and tourism: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52(3), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.07.018
9.
FörsterJ.DannenbergL. (2010). Glomosys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21(3), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2010.487849
10.
FowlerJ. G.MuncyJ. A.IyerR. (2017). The cultural meaning transfer of fashion aesthetics. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 38(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2017.1291380
11.
FredricksonB. L.BraniganC. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
12.
Frías-JamilenaD. M.Fernández-RuanoM. L.Polo-PeñaA. I. (2022). Gamified environmental interpretation as a strategy for improving tourist behavior in support of sustainable tourism: The moderating role of psychological distance. Tourism Management, 91(4), 104519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104519
GasperK.CloreG. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00406
15.
GrohsR.ReisingerH. (2014). Sponsorship effects on brand image: The role of exposure and activity involvement. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.008
16.
HavitzM. E.MannellR. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950048
17.
HuangS.WeilerB.AssakerG. (2015). Effects of interpretive guiding outcomes on tourist satisfaction and behavioral intention. Journal of Travel Research, 54(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513517426
18.
HuangT. L.LiuB. S. C. (2021). Augmented reality is human-like: How the humanizing experience inspires destination brand love. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170(6), 120853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120853
19.
HuangZ.WengL.BaoJ. (2022). How do visitors respond to sustainable tourism interpretations? A further investigation into content and media format. Tourism Management, 92(5), 104535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104535
20.
JiF.WangF.WuB. (2023). How does virtual tourism involvement impact the social education effect of cultural heritage?Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 28(2), 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100779
21.
JianY.ZhouZ.ZhouN. (2019). Brand cultural symbolism, brand authenticity, and consumer well-being: The moderating role of cultural involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(4), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-08-2018-1981
22.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
23.
KimA. J.JohnsonK. K. P. (2016). Power of consumers using social media: Examining the influences of brand-related user-generated content on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 58(5), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.047
24.
KimJ.ChoiY.LeeW. S. (2023). Effects of knowledge and perceived image on willingness-to-pay for access to world cultural heritage sites in Korea: Using the dual coding theory of learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 28(8), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2023.2264967
25.
KimW. H.MalekK.RobertsK. R. (2019). The effectiveness of green advertising in the convention industry: An application of a dual coding approach and the norm activation model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.007
LeeT. H. (2011). How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(7), 895–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.570345
28.
LeiS. I.YeS.WangD.LawR. (2020). Engaging customers in value co-creation through mobile instant messaging in the tourism and hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019893066
29.
LiB.JinL.LiJ. (2025). Impact of awe on sustainable tourism consumption decisions: Roles of diminished self-importance and regulatory focus. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33, 2132–2152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2427816
30.
LiY.WanL. C.LuoX.WuC. (2023). If museum treasures could talk: How anthropomorphism increases favorable visitor responses. Annals of Tourism Research, 99(2), 103540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103540
31.
LinZ.RuanH.ZhangH.XiaoX. (2024). Antecedents, manifestations, and environmental consequences of destination anthropomorphism: The case of nature-based destinations. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 58(1), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.03.001
32.
LiuH.XuS.ChenZ.HouY. (2023). The impact of social distancing on tourists’ preferences for anthropomorphism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 55(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.05.002
33.
LiuY.NingS.ZhangM.FontX.ZengH. (2024). Can anthropomorphic interpretation cues motivate tourists to have civilized behavioral intentions? The roles of meaningful experience and narrative. Tourism Management, 103(4), 104905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104905
34.
LuciforaC.SchembriM.PoggiF.GrassoG. M.GangemiA. (2023). Virtual reality supports perspective taking in cultural heritage interpretation. Computers in Human Behavior, 148(12), 107911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107911
35.
LvX.LiuY.XuS.LiQ. (2021). Welcoming host, cozy house? The impact of service attitude on sensory experience. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95(4), 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102949
36.
MaJ.LuY.GongY.LiR. (2024). Diversity in online self-organizing teams: Longitudinal evidence from an open innovation community. Management Decision, 62(1), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2022-1182
37.
ManiscalcoU.MinutoloA.StornioloP.EspositoM. (2024). Towards a more anthropomorphic interaction with robots in museum settings: An experimental study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 171(1), 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2023.104561
38.
MaozE.TyboutA. M. (2002). The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1202_05
39.
McCrackenG. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/209217
40.
PackerJ.BallantyneR.HughesK. (2014). Chinese and Australian tourists’ attitudes to nature, animals and environmental issues: Implications for the design of nature-based tourism experiences. Tourism Management, 44(5), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.02.013
41.
PaivioA. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
42.
PearceJ.Strickland-MunroJ.MooreS. A. (2017). What fosters awe-inspiring experiences in nature-based tourism destinations?Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(3), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1213270
43.
RadomskayaV.PearceP. L. (2021). Adding character: The role of destination mascots in tourism development. Tourism Management, 84(3), 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104248
44.
RuanW. Q.WangM. Y.ZhangS. N.LiY. Q.SuX. (2024). Knowledge-based or affection-based? The influence mechanism of heritage tourism interpretation content on tourists’ willingness to inherit culture. Tourism Management, 102(3), 104876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104876
ScarpiD.PizziG.RaggiottoF. (2019). The extraordinary attraction of being ordinary: A moderated mediation model of purchase for prototypical products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.006
47.
SchafferV.HucksteppT.Kannis-DymandL. (2024). Awe: A systematic review within a cognitive behavioural framework and proposed cognitive behavioural model of awe. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 9(1), 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-023-00116-3
48.
ShiotaM. N.KeltnerD.MossmanA. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition & Emotion, 21(5), 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600923668
49.
SuL.TangB.NawijnJ. (2021). How tourism activity shapes travel experience sharing: Tourist well-being and social context. Annals of Tourism Research, 91(6), 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103316
50.
SuQ.LiF. S. (2023). How cute mascots affect relationships with tourism destinations: A moderated mediation model. Tourism Management, 99(6), Article 104782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104782
51.
TownsendC.KahnB. E. (2014). The “visual preference heuristic”: The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993–1015. https://doi.org/10.1086/673521
52.
TsepapadakisM.GavalasD. (2023). Are you talking to me? An Audio Augmented Reality conversational guide for cultural heritage. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 92(5), 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2023.101797
53.
TsiakaliK. (2018). User-generated-content versus marketing-generated-content: Personality and content influence on traveler’s behavior. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27(8), 946–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2018.1477643
54.
WangA.PanJ.JiangC.JinJ. (2023). Create the best first glance: The cross-cultural effect of image background on purchase intention. Decision Support Systems, 170(7), 113962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.113962
55.
WangF.HuangS.MorrisonA. M.WuB. (2022). The effects of virtual reality tourism involvement on place attachment and behavioral intentions: Virtual reality tourism of the yellow crane tower in Wuhan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 27(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2022.2061363
WangM. Y.LiY. Q.RuanW. Q.ZhangS. N.LiR.ZhangK. F. (2025). To understand or to touch? Evoking tourists’ cultural preservation commitment through heritage tourism interpretation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(1), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2316299
58.
WaytzA.CacioppoJ.EpleyN. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369336
59.
WyerR. S.HungI. W.JiangY. (2008). Visual and verbal processing strategies in comprehension and judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(4), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.002
XuX.HuH. (2025). Exploration of the roles of awe at temple sites: Findings from structural equation modelling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, 28, 3208–3222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2422047
62.
YanA.JiaW. (2021). The influence of eliciting awe on pro-environmental behavior of tourist in religious tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48(3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.05.007
63.
YanY. Q.ShenH. J.YeB. H.ZhouL. (2022). From axe to awe: Assessing the co-effects of awe and authenticity on industrial heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(17), 2821–2837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1996543
64.
YangS. B.HleeS.LeeJ.KooC. (2017). An empirical examination of online restaurant reviews on Yelp.com. A dual coding theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 817–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-11-2015-0643
65.
YinJ.ChenH.NiY. (2024). Vloggers and consumer choices in the hotel and hospitality sector: The double-edged sword of discounts. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 58(1), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.02.006
66.
ZaichkowskyJ. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/208520
67.
ZengG.CaoX.LinZ.XiaoS. H. (2020). When online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking. Annals of Tourism Research, 81(2), 102860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102860
68.
ZhangS.ChanE. S. W. (2020). A modernism-based interpretation of sustainable tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 22(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2330
69.
ZhangS. N.RuanW. Q.LiY. Q.LiR.WangM. Y. (2024). How to avoid the cultural distortion risk at heritage sites? A configuration analysis perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 63(6), 1490–1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231194275
70.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G. ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
71.
ZhouZ.HeY.XieY.MehmoodS. (2024). How cultural involvement in different brand types influences willingness to pay premium: The mediating role of brand happiness. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100908
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
