Limited research has examined the travel experiences of Asian women living in patriarchal societies. This study explores the interrelationships between gender, patriarchy, culture, and the travel experiences of women in Brunei where Islam plays a central role religiously and culturally. Intersectionality served as a guiding theoretical framework. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 49 girls and women aged 18 to 64. Findings show that Bruneian men tend to be viewed as breadwinners, providers, protectors, decision makers, and leaders, while women are homemakers, housewives, cooks, care givers, and helpers. Interviewees said they encounter more restrictions than men in terms of travelling for leisure. These are of socio-cultural, religious, and gender-related nature, which cumulatively affect women’s holiday choices. While travelling abroad, their multiple identities (female, Muslim, Asian/Malay) often intersect, shaping how they are judged and treated in different cultural contexts. Implications are discussed for further research on gender and tourism.
AdibA.GuerrierY. (2003). The interlocking of gender with nationality, race, ethnicity and class: The narratives of women in hotel work. Gender Work and Organization, 10(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00204
2.
AdlerP. A.AdlerP. H. (2004). Paradise labourers: Hotel work in the Global Economy. Cornell University Press.
3.
AhmadN. (2019). Policy implications for working women in Brunei. Japan Labor Issues, 3(17), 39–46.
AitchisonC.ReevesC. (1998). Gendered (bed)spaces: The culture and commerce of women only tourism. In AitchisonC.JordanF. (Eds.), Gender, space and identity. Leisure, culture and Commerce (pp. 47–68). Leisure Studies Association.
6.
AlbertiG.IannuzziF. E. (2020). Embodied intersectionality and the intersectional management of hotel labour: The everyday experiences of social differentiation in customer-oriented work. Gender Work and Organization, 27, 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12454
7.
AustenJ. (1817/1993). Persuasion. Wordsworth.
8.
BilgeS. (2013). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Reviews, 10(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283
9.
BowlegL. (2021). Evolving intersectionality within public health: From analysis to action. American Journal of Public Health, 111(1), 88–90. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306031
ChhabraD.AndereckK.YamanoiK.PlunkettD. (2011). Gender equity and social marketing: An analysis of tourism advertisements. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2011.545739
13.
ChhabraD.JohnstonE. (2014). Dispelling gendered myths in tourism promotional materials: An upstream social marketing perspective. Tourism Analysis, 19, 775–780. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354214x14146846679646
14.
ChiangC. Y.JogaratnamG. (2006). Why do women travel solo for purposes of leisure?Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766706059041
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–168.
EnloeC. (1989). Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of International Politics. University of California Press.
22.
EspositoJ.Evans-WintersV. (2022). Introduction to intersectional qualitative research. Sage.
23.
GaoJ.KerstetterD. L. (2016). Using an intersectionality perspective to uncover older Chinese female’s perceived travel constraints and negotiation strategies. Tourism Management, 57, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.001
24.
GreerG. (1999). The whole woman. Anchor.
25.
GuanA.ThomasM.VittinghoffE.BowlegL.MangurianC.WessonP. (2021). An investigation of quantitative methods for assessing intersectionality in health research: A systematic review. SSM – Population Health, 16, 100977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100977
HendersonK. A.GibsonH. J. (2013). An integrative review of women, gender, and leisure: Increasing complexities. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i2-3008
28.
JablonkaV. (2023). A history of masculinity from patriarchy to Gender Justice. Penguin.
29.
JordanF.AitchisonC. (2008). Tourism and the sexualisation of the gaze: Solo female tourists’ experiences of gendered power, surveillance and embodiment. Leisure Studies, 27(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360802125080
30.
JordanF.GibsonH. (2005). “We'Re Not Stupid . . . But We'Ll Not Stay Home Either”: Experiences of Solo Women Travelers. Tourism Review International, 9(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427205774791663
31.
KaragözD.IşıkC.DogruT.ZhangL. (2021). Solo female travel risks, anxiety and travel intentions: Examining the moderating role of online psychological-social support. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(11), 1595–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1816929
32.
LahmanM. K. E. (2025). An Introduction to qualitative research: Becoming culturally responsive. Sage.
33.
LucenaR.Vorobjovas-PintaO.CaiW. (2021). Introduction to gender and sexuality in tourism and hospitality. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 21(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584211052100
34.
MadkhaliH.LugosiP.HawkinsR. (2024). Socio-cultural drivers of Saudi tourists’ outbound destination decisions. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 30(3), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667231152937
35.
McDowellL. (2011). Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities. Wiley.
36.
Ministry of Primary Resources and Tourism (MPRT). (2022). Brunei Tourism Performance Final Report. Retrieved 15 September 2023, from http://www.tourism.gov.bn.
MoufakkirO.AlSalehD. (2017). A conceptual framework for studying recreational travel motivation from an Arab perspective. Tourism Recreation Research, 42(4), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2017.1354496
OsmanH.BrownL.PhungT. M. T. (2020). The travel motivations and experiences of female Vietnamese solo travellers. Tourist Studies, 20(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797619878307
41.
PritchardA.MorganN.AteljevicI.HarrisC. (2007). Editors’ introduction: Tourism, gender, embodiment and experience. In PritchardA.MorganN.AteljevicI.HarrisC. (Eds.), Tourism and Gender: Embodiment, sensuality, and experience (pp. 1–12). CABI.
42.
RiceC.HarrisonE.FriedmanM. (2019). Doing justice to intersectionality in research. Cultural Studie Critical Methodologies, 19(6), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708619829779
SwainM. B.WilsonE.YangE. C. L.ChambersD. (2024). An intergenerational dialogue about gender in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103706
46.
TapiaM.LeeT. L.FilipovitchM. (2017). Supra-union and intersectional organizing: An examination of two prominent cases in the low-wage US restaurant industry. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59(4), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185617714817
47.
TetreaultM. K. T. (1985). Feminist phase theory: An experience-derived evaluation model. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 363–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981301
48.
TruongV. D.SaundersS. G.TkaczynskiA.Rundle-ThieleS. (2024). Tourism and social marketing: An integrative review. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(12), 2698–2717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2309729
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2003). UNESCO’s Gender Mainstreaming Implementation Framework (GMIF) for 2002-2007. UNESCO.
51.
ValentineG. (1992). Images of danger: Women’s sources of information about the spatial distribution of male violence. Area, 24(1), 22–29.
WilsonE.LittleD. E. (2008). The solo female travel experience: Exploring the ‘geography of women’s fear. Current Issues in Tourism, 11(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.2167/cit342.0
54.
WinterT. (2009). Asian tourism and the retreat of Anglo-western centrism in tourism theory. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500802220695
55.
WoyoE.VenganaiH. (Eds.). (2022). Gender, Disability and Tourism in Africa: Intersectional Perspectives. Springer Nature.
56.
YangE. C. L.Khoo-LattimoreC.ArcodiaC. (2018a). Power and empowerment: How Asian solo female travellers perceive and negotiate risks. Tourism Management, 68, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.017
57.
YangE. C. L.Khoo-LattimoreC.ArcodiaC. (2018b). Constructing space and self through risk taking: A case of Asian solo female travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 57(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517692447
58.
YangE. C. L.Khoo-LattimoreC.ArcodiaC. (2017). A narrative review of Asian female travellers: Looking into the future through the past. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(10), 1008–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1208741
59.
YusofB.AzalieI. (2025). Jawi and cultural heritage conservation: A case study of Brunei’s Yayasan Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Islamic Calligraphy and Arts Study Centre. In TruongV. D.KnightD. W. (Eds.), Heritage Tourism Vietnam and Asia (pp. 235–252). Springer.
60.
ZhangY.HitchcockM. J. (2017). The Chinese female tourist gaze: A netnography of young women’s blogs on Macao. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.904845
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
