This study introduces the Limen Experiences in Tourism Scale, a paired-percentage instrument that operationalizes Turner’s liminal-liminoid framework as five bipolar continua Exploration-Familiarity, Freedom to-Constraint, Freedom from Routine-Attachment, Individualism-Collectivism, and Personality Change-Status Quo. Validation with 2,432 adult travelers from panel and university samples confirmed a stable five-factor structure and revealed clear age gradients: respondents aged 18 to 34 located themselves over 20 percentage-points nearer the liminoid pole on both Freedom continua than those aged 65+. The scale enables destinations to pinpoint visitor positions – for example, 60% Exploration/40% Familiarity – and design calibrated offerings that range from “guided discovery” itineraries for ambivalent explorers to ritualized group formats for liminal seekers. By empirically demonstrating that liminal and liminoid coexist as measurable degrees rather than discrete states, the findings also resolve a long-standing conceptual divide in tourism studies. Generalizability remains constrained by the Hungary-centric sampling frame; future research should replicate the continuum across diverse cultural contexts and test how positional scores predict behavioral and affective outcomes.
AhnM. J.McKercherB. (2018). Hofstede’s cultural indices revisited: The relationship between cultural values and international tourism. Tourism Culture & Communication, 18(4), 241–250.
2.
AitchisonC. (2005). Feminist and gender research in sport and leisure management: Understanding the social-cultural nexus of gender-power relations. Journal of Sport Management, 19(4), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.19.4.422
3.
AitchisonC. (2012). Gendered embodiment and the feminist agenda for tourism research. In WilsonJ.MüllerD. K. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of tourism geographies, (pp. 50–59). Routledge.
4.
AlexanderM.BryceD.MurdyS. (2017). Delivering the past: Providing personalized ancestral tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 56(4), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516643414
5.
AndrewsH.RobertsL. (2012). Liminal landscapes: Travel, experience and spaces in-between. Routledge.
6.
BaltaciM.CakiciA. C. (2022a). Liminoid behaviour in tourism. In BuhalisD. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of tourism management and marketing (pp. 57–60). Edward Elgar Publishing.
7.
BrookerE.JoppeM. (2014). Developing a tourism innovation typology: Leveraging liminal insights. Journal of Travel Research, 53(4), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513497839
ChengT. M.HuangM. Y.HuangL. M. (2013). The influence of place attachment on the relationship between destination attractiveness and environmentally responsible behavior for island tourism in Penghu, Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(8), 1166–1187.
10.
CheungG. W.LauR. S. (2012). A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111421987
11.
ChowI.MurphyP. (2011). Predicting intended and actual travel behaviors: An examination of Chinese outbound tourists to Australia. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2011.563166
CollinsonE.BaxterI. (2022). Liminality and contemporary engagement: Knockando Wool Mill – A cultural heritage case study. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 17(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873x.2020.1828428
19.
ContiE.Heldt CasselS. (2020). Liminality in nature-based tourism experiences as mediated through social media. Tourism Geographies, 22(2), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2019.1648544
Cruz-MilánO. (2023). Understanding psychographic tourist segments: A review and integration. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 100991.
22.
Cruz-MilánO. (2024). A review of empirical research on Plog’s psychographics in tourism. In Tourism planning and destination marketing (2nd ed., pp. 1–32). Emerald Publishing Limited
23.
DannG. M. (1981). Tourist motivation an appraisal. Annals of Tourism Research, 8(2), 187–219.
FengY.LaiI. K. W.ChenS. X. (2025). Exploring the impact of perceived liminal experiences on female tourists’ eudaimonic Well-Being through the mediation of travel satisfaction. International Journal of Tourism Research, 27, e70044. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.70044
28.
FerrandoP. J.Lorenzo-SevaU. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
GraburnN. H. H. (1977). Tourism: The sacred journey. In SmithV. L. (Ed.), Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism (pp. 17–31). University of Pennsylvania Press.
HanH.KiatkawsinK.KimW.LeeS. (2017). Investigating customer loyalty formation for wellness spa: Individualism vs. Collectivism. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 67, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.07.007
33.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
34.
HolmqvistJ.PonsignonF. (2025). Liminality in customer experiences: The uncertain outcome of employing liminal spaces for customer escapism. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115003
35.
HorvathA.ThomassenB.WydraH. (Eds.) (2022). Breaking boundaries: Varieties of liminality. Berghahn Books.
36.
HuangX.WangP.WuL. (2024). Well-being through transformation: An integrative framework of transformative tourism experiences and hedonic versus eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Travel Research, 63(4), 974–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231171670
IbarraH.ObodaruO. (2016). Betwixt and between identities: Liminal experience in contemporary careers. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.003
39.
Iso-AholaS. E.AllenJ. R. (1982). The dynamics of leisure motivation: The effects of outcome on leisure needs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1982.10605240
40.
KahanaN. (2024). Providing a platform for self-transformation: Existential authentication and the inward gaze. Annals of Tourism Research, 108, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103815
41.
KimJ. H.RitchieJ. R. B.McCormickB. (2012). Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510385467
LamondI. R.MossJ. (2020). Liminality and critical event studies: Borders, boundaries, and contestation. Springer.
44.
LeeC. K.LeeY. K.WicksB. E. (2004). Segmentation of festival motivation by nationality and satisfaction. Tourism Management, 25(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00060-8
45.
LeeS.InS.SeoW. J. (2015). Repeat attendance as a function of liminality, communitas and team identification. South African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation, 37(1), 59–76.
LiM.ZhangH.MaoI.DengC. (2011). Segmenting Chinese outbound tourists by perceived constraints. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(6), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2011.598747
51.
LimC.MacGregorC. A.PutnamR. D. (2010). Secular and liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01533.x
52.
LiuS.LaiD.HuangS.LiZ. (2021). Scale development and validation of anime tourism motivations. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(20), 2939–2954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1854198
53.
LuoJ.JianI. Y.YungE. H. K.ChanE. H. W.ChenW. (2024). Pursuing social cohesion in cultural tourism destinations: Liminality as a mediator. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(15), 2499–2515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2235878
54.
MacCannellD. (1992). Empty meeting grounds: The tourist papers. Routledge.
55.
MagrizosS.KostopoulosI.PowersL. (2021). Volunteer tourism as a transformative experience: A mixed methods empirical study. Journal of Travel Research, 60, 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520913630
56.
MamédioD. F.CunhaM. P. E.RegoA.CleggS. (2025). Paradoxes of authenticity in liminal consumption: The case of Casablanca’s Rick’s Café. Journal of Travel Research, 64, 1376–1392. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875241249414
MeadeA. W.LautenschlagerG. J.HechtJ. E. (2005). Establishing measurement equivalence and invariance in longitudinal data with item response theory. International Journal of Testing, 5(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_6
59.
MeethanK. (2012). Walking the edges: Towards a visual ethnography of beachscapes. In AndrewsH.RobertsL. (Eds.), Liminal landscapes: Travel, experience and spaces in-between (pp. 69–86). Routledge.
MilazzoL. (2023). From home to Hogsmeade: A phenomenological study of liminoidity in media tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 103, 103679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103679
62.
MilazzoL.SoulardJ. (2024). Bridging disciplinary perspectives on transformation: Epistemologically evaluating liminality and transformative learning. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103710
OECD. (2024). OECD tourism trends and policies 2024. OECD Publishing.
66.
PearceP. L.LeeU. I. (2005). Developing the travel career approach to tourist motivation. Journal of Travel Research, 43(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504272020
67.
PicardD.RobinsonM. (2016). Tourism and the power of otherness: Seductions of difference. Channel View Publications.
68.
PlogS. C. (1974). Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 14(4), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/001088047401400409
69.
PrayagG.OzanneL. K.SpectorS. (2021). A psychological wellbeing perspective of long-term disaster recovery following the Canterbury earthquakes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102438
70.
ReisingerY.MavondoF. (2006). Cultural differences in travel risk perception. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 20(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v20n01_02
71.
RubinsteinR. Y.KroeseD. P. (2004). The cross-entropy method: a unified approach to combinatorial optimization, Monte-Carlo simulation and machine learning. Springer Science & Business Media.
72.
SantosH. C.VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617700622
73.
SelänniemiT. (2003). On holiday in the liminoid playground: Place, time, and self in tourism. In BauerT. G.McKercherB. (Eds.), Sex and tourism: Journeys of romance, love, and lust (pp. 19–31). Haworth Press.
74.
SeunghwanL. E. E.SangwooI. N.SEOW. J. (2015). Repeat attendance as a function of liminality, communitas and team identification. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education & Recreation, 37(1), 59–76.
75.
SkandalisA.BanisterE.ByromJ. (2024). Spatial authenticity and extraordinary experiences: Music festivals and the everyday nature of tourism destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 63(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231159054
76.
SnepengerD.KingJ.MarshallE.UysalM. (2006). Modeling iso-Ahola’s motivation theory in the tourism context. Journal of Travel Research, 45(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287506291592
77.
SoulardJ.McGeheeN. G.SternM. J.LamoureuxK. M. (2021). Transformative tourism: Tourists’ drawings, symbols, and narratives of change. Annals of Tourism Research, 87, 103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103141
78.
SpiegelA. D. (2011). Categorical difference versus continuum: Rethinking Turner’s liminal-liminoid distinction. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34(1-2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2011.11500004
79.
TaheriB.FarringtonT.CurranR.O’GormanK. (2018). Retracted Article: Sustainability and the authentic experience. Harnessing brand heritage – A study from Japan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1310867
80.
TaheriB.GoriK.O’GormanK.HoggG.FarringtonT. (2016). Experiential liminoid consumption: The case of nightclubbing. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(1–2), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2015.1089309
81.
ThomassenB. (2014). Liminality and the modern: Living through the in-between. Routledge.
82.
ThomassenB. (2015). Liminality and the modern: Living through the in-between. Routledge.
83.
TingH.KahlC. (2016). Self discovery and backpackers: A conceptual paper about liminal experience. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage, 4(1), 49–58.
84.
TomazosK.MurdyS. (2024). The limits of transformation: Exploring liminality and the volunteer tourists’ limbo. Tourism Recreation Research, 49(6), 1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2162695
85.
ToyamaM.YamadaY. (2012). The relationships among tourist novelty, familiarity, satisfaction, and destination loyalty: Beyond the novelty-familiarity continuum. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(6), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v4n6p10
TsaurS. H.YenC. H.TengH. Y. (2018). Tourist-resident conflict: A scale development and empirical study. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 10, 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.09.002
88.
TurnerV. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing.
89.
TurnerV. (1974a). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Cornell University Press.
90.
TurnerV. (1974b). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice University Studies, 60(3), 53–92.
91.
TurnerV. (1979). Frame, flow and reflection: Ritual and drama as public liminality. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 6(4), 465–499. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.6.4.1979.465-499
92.
TurnerV. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. PAJ Publications.
93.
UrryJ. (1990). The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. Sage Publications.
94.
UysalM.GahanL.MartinB. (1993). An examination of event motivations: A case study. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 1(1), 5–10.
95.
UysalM.LiX.Sirakaya-TurkE. (2009). Push-pull dynamics in travel decisions. In OhH. (Ed.), Handbook of hospitality marketing management (pp. 412–439). Routledge.
96.
Van GennepA. (1909). The rites of passage. University of Chicago Press.
97.
WaittG.MarkwellK. (2020). Gay tourism: Culture and context. Routledge.
98.
WangD.ShenC.-C. (2024). Impact of liminality in organic agricultural tourism on well-being: The role of memorable tourism experiences as a mediating variable. Agriculture, 14(9), 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091508
World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of travel and tourism: Embracing sustainable and inclusive growth [briefing paper]. Author.
101.
World Travel & Tourism Council. (2023). A world in motion: Shifting consumer travel trends in 2022 and beyond [consumer trends report]. Author. In partnership with Trip.com Group and Deloitte Global.
XieH.CostaC. A.MoraisD. B. (2008). Gender differences in rural tourists’ motivation and activity participation. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 16(4), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10507050801951452
104.
YangX.ZhangL.FengZ. (2024). Personalized tourism recommendations and the E-tourism user experience. Journal of Travel Research, 63(5), 1183–1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231187332
105.
ZhaiX.ZhongD.LuoQ.LuP. (2024). Events as therapy: Connecting the liminal and everyday field to enhance mental wellness in urban destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 109, 103825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103825
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
