Abstract
During online purchases, tourists typically begin by retrieving the names of accommodations and subsequently proceed to explore additional information such as peer reviews and the host’s gender. However, it remains unclear whether and how name cues bias tourists’ attitudes and purchase decisions, and how additional information may modify these biases. In a series of studies, we find, firstly, that tourists perceive accommodations with feminine names as being warmer, while those with masculine names are seen as more competent. Secondly, the host’s gender and peers’ ambivalent reviews, can moderately adjust but cannot reverse the initial judgments of warmth or competence induced by the names. Thirdly, this effect is consistent across different tourists’ genders. These findings contribute to our understanding of how tourists formulate judgments in contexts of uncertainty and abundant information, underscore the significance of the initial cues given by the names of accommodations, and expand upon the heuristic bias theory.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
