Tourism emerges as a focal point under the “new mobilities” paradigm. Current research, however, needs to address how groups with limited mobility navigate their travel experiences. This study delves into the tourism patterns of tourists with physical disabilities—a prominent mobility-limited demographic. Utilizing constructivist grounded theory through interviews, participatory observation, and online data collection, we discern that the tourism experience of those with physical disabilities is shaped dynamically by “comparison” across four orientations: time, space, self, and others. This multidimensional comparison transitions from tangible tourism to profound experiential realms, defining their unique travel experiences. “Comparison” is identified as a core microgenetic mechanism, challenging existing psychological theories and potentially reshaping our understanding of the experiential processes for all tourist groups, not just those with mobility limitations. The findings enrich our understanding of mobility-constrained tourism within the “new mobilities” paradigm, offering insights and practical implications for the tourism industry. This article is also available in [Chinese]. See supplemental material for details.
AdeyP.BissellD.HannamK.MerrimanP.ShellerM. (2014). The Routledge handbook of mobilities. Routledge.
2.
Adu-AmpongE. A.AdamsE. A. (2019). “But you are also Ghanaian, you should know”: Negotiating the insider–outsider research positionality in the fieldwork encounter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 583–592.
3.
BandyopadhyayR. (2012). “ To be an Englishman for a day”: Marketing colonial nostalgia in India. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 1245–1248.
4.
BargemanB.RichardsG. (2020). A new approach to understanding tourism practices. Annals of Tourism Research, 84, 102988.
5.
BaumanZ. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Columbia University Press.
6.
BigneE.Fuentes-MedinaM. L.Morini-MarreroS. (2020). Memorable tourist experiences versus ordinary tourist experiences analysed through user-generated content. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 309–318.
7.
BohnsackR. (2009). The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Historische Sozialforschung [Historical Social Research], 34(2), 296–321.
8.
BonehillJ.von BenzonN.ShawJ. (2020). “The shops were only made for people who could walk”: Impairment, barriers and autonomy in the mobility of adults with Cerebral Palsy in urban England. Mobilities, 15(3), 341–361.
9.
BurnsN.PatersonK.WatsonN. (2009). An inclusive outdoors? Disabled people’s experiences of countryside leisure services. Leisure Studies, 28(4), 403–417.
10.
Cerdán-ChiscanoMDarcyS. (2021). C2C co-creation of inclusive tourism experiences for customers with disability in a shared heritage context experience. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(21), 3072–3089.
11.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
12.
CharmazK. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 397–412). The Gulford Press.
13.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
14.
CharmazK. (2017). Special invited paper: Continuities, contradictions, and critical inquiry in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–8.
15.
CharmazK.ThornbergR. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327.
16.
ChenJ. F.ChangT. C. (2020). Touring as labour: Mobilities and reconsideration of tour guiding in everyday life. Tourism Geographies, 22(4–5), 813–831.
17.
ContiE.CasselS. H. (2020). Liminality in nature based tourism experiences as mediated through social media. Tourism Geographies, 22(2), 413–432.
18.
CresswellT. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31.
19.
CresswellT.MerrimanP. (2011). Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects. Ashgate.
20.
CresswellT.UtengT. P. (2016). Gendered mobilities: Towards an holistic understanding. In UtengT. P. (Ed.), Gendered mobilities (pp. 1–12). Ashgate.
21.
Das NevesB.UnsworthC.BrowningC. (2023). “Being treated like an actual person”: Attitudinal accessibility on the bus. Mobilities, 18(3), 425–444.
22.
Den HoedW. (2020). Where everyday mobility meets tourism: An age-friendly perspective on cycling in the Netherlands and the UK. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(2), 185–203.
23.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
24.
De PascaleA.MeledduM.AbbateT.PellicanoM. (2023). Is there a gender gap in the propensity to travel of people with disabilities?Journal of Travel Research, 62(3), 517–539.
25.
De PickerM. (2020). Rethinking inclusion and disability activism at academic conferences: Strategies proposed by a PhD student with a physical disability. Disability & Society, 35(1), 163–167.
26.
DevileE.KastenholzE. (2018). Accessible tourism experiences: The voice of people with visual disabilities. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 10(3), 265–285.
27.
DickinsonJ. E.PeetersP. (2014). Time, tourism consumption and sustainable development. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(1), 11–21.
28.
DueB. L. (2023). Guide dog versus robot dog: Assembling visually impaired people with non-human agents and achieving assisted mobility through distributed co-constructed perception. Mobilities, 18(1), 148–166.
29.
EdwardsR.HollandJ. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing?Bloomsbury Academic.
30.
EvcilA. N. (2017). Barriers and preferences to leisure activities for wheelchair users in historic places. Tourism Geographies, 20(4), 698–715.
31.
FeldmanB.WiltonR.Fudge SchormansA. (2020). Including people with intellectual disabilities in the mobilities turn: Mobile interviews in Toronto, Canada. Mobilities, 15(3), 362–379.
32.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
33.
FigueiredoE.EusébioC.KastenholzE. (2012). How diverse are tourists with disabilities? A pilot study on accessible leisure tourism experiences in Portugal. International Journal of Tourism Research, 14(6), 531–550.
34.
GedechoE. K.KimS.SenbetoD. L. (2023). Emotional and hedonic well-being experiences of diaspora festival visitors: A contemporary migrants’ perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 63(7), 1797–1816.
35.
Germann MolzJ.ParisC. M. (2015). The social affordances of flashpacking: Exploring the mobility nexus of travel and communication. Mobilities, 10(2), 173–192.
36.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
37.
GillenJ.MostafanezhadM. (2019). Geopolitical encounters of tourism: A conceptual approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 75, 70–78.
38.
GleesonB. (2002). Geographies of disability. Routledge.
39.
GoethalsG. R.AllisonS. J.FrostM. (1979). Perceptions of the magnitude and diversity of social support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(6), 570–581.
40.
GogginG. (2016). Disability and mobilities: Evening up social futures. Mobilities, 11(4), 533–541.
41.
GrenierA.GriffinM.AndrewsG.WiltonR.BurkeE.OjembeB.FeldmanB.PapaioannouA. (2019). Meanings and feelings of (im) mobility in later life: Case study insights from a “new mobilities” perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 51, 100819.
42.
HannamK.ButlerG.ParisC. M. (2014). Developments and key issues in tourism mobilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 171–185.
43.
HannamK.ShellerM.UrryJ. (2006). Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22.
44.
HuaC.ColeS.ZhangY.WangW.ZhaoH. (2023). Exploring needed support as a motivational factor for travelers with mobility impairments: A sequential mixed-methods exploration. Journal of Travel Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231215017
45.
HunterA.MurphyK.GrealishA.CaseyD.KeadyJ. (2011). Navigating the grounded theory terrain. Part I. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 5–10.
46.
ImrieR. (2016). Disability and discourses of mobility and movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(9), 1641–1656.
47.
ImrieR.EdwardsC. (2007). The geographies of disability: Reflections on the development of a sub-discipline. Geography Compass, 1(3), 623–640.
48.
JamalT.HighamJ. (2021). Justice and ethics: Towards a new platform for tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(2–3), 143–157.
49.
JamesW. (1980). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt.
50.
JensenM. T.ChambersD.WilsonS. (2023). The future of deaf tourism studies: An interdisciplinary research agenda. Annals of Tourism Research, 100, 103549.
51.
JensenM. T.ScarlesC.CohenS. A. (2015). A multisensory phenomenology of interrail mobilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 53, 61–76.
52.
JensenO. B. (2013). Staging mobilities. Routledge.
53.
JinH.MoscardoG.MurphyL. (2020). Exploring Chinese outbound tourist shopping: A social practice framework. Journal of Travel Research, 59(1), 156–172.
54.
KaaristoM.RhodenS. (2017). Everyday life and water tourism mobilities: Mundane aspects of canal travel. Tourism Geographies, 19(1), 78–95.
55.
KantI. (1998). Critique of pure reason (GuyerP.WoodA. W., Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
56.
KennyM.FourieR. (2015). Contrasting classic, Straussian, and constructivist grounded theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270–1289.
57.
KimS.FilimonauV.DickinsonJ. E. (2023). Tourist perception of the value of time on holidays: Implications for the time use rebound effect and sustainable travel practice. Journal of Travel Research, 62(2), 362–381.
58.
KromidhaE.GannonM.TaheriB. (2021). A profile-based approach to understanding social exchange: Authentic tour-guiding in the sharing economy. Journal of Travel Research, 62(2), 324–344.
59.
LamersM.van der DuimR.SpaargarenG. (2017). The relevance of practice theories for tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 62, 54–63.
60.
LamontM.SwidlerA. (2014). Methodological pluralism and the possibilities and limits of interviewing. Qualitative Sociology, 37(2), 153–171.
61.
LarsenJ.BastosM. S. G.HansenL. I. S.HevinkL. M.JostovaK.SmagurauskaiteD. (2021). Bubble-wrapped sightseeing mobilities: Hop on-hop off bus experiences in Copenhagen. Tourist Studies, 21(3), 387–403.
62.
LehtoX.LuoW.MiaoL.GhiselliR. F. (2018). Shared tourism experience of individuals with disabilities and their caregivers. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8, 185–193.
63.
LeiperN. (1979). The framework of tourism: Towards a definition of tourism, tourist, and the tourist industry. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 390–407.
64.
LyonsG.UrryJ. (2005). Travel time use in the information age. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 257–276.
65.
MatteucciX. (2014). Forms of body usage in tourists’ experiences of flamenco. Annals of Tourism Research, 46, 29–43.
66.
McKercherB.DarcyS. (2018). Re-conceptualizing barriers to travel by people with disabilities. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 59–66.
67.
Merleau-PontyM. (1996). Phenomenology of perception. Motilal Banarsidass Publisher.
68.
MillsJ.BonnerA.FrancisK. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25–35.
69.
MouraA.EusébioC.DevileE. (2023). The “why” and “what for” of participation in tourism activities: Travel motivations of people with disabilities. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(6), 941–957.
70.
NealeD. C.SonstroemR. J.MetzK. F. (1969). Physical fitness, self-esteem, and attitudes toward physical activity. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 40(4), 743–749.
71.
NiggJ. J.PetersM. (2022). The evolution of ICTs in accessible tourism: A stakeholder collaboration analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52, 287–294.
72.
NiggJ. J.PlaiknerA.PetersM.HaidM. (2024). Leisure constraints towards accessible tourism: Self-characteristics of people with disability along tourism value chains. Current Issues in Tourism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2024.2394965
73.
OliverM. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026.
74.
PaananenK.MinoiaP. (2019). Cruisers in the city of Helsinki: Staging the mobility of cruise passengers. Tourism Geographies, 21(5), 801–821.
75.
ParentL. (2016). The wheeling interview: Mobile methods and disability. Mobilities, 11(4), 521–532.
76.
PoriaY.ReichelA.BrandtY. (2009a). The flight experiences of people with disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Travel Research, 49(2), 216–227.
77.
PoriaY.ReichelA.BrandtY. (2009b). People with disabilities visit art museums: An exploratory study of obstacles and difficulties. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 4(2), 117–129.
78.
PoriaY.ReichelA.BrandtY. (2011). Dimensions of hotel experience of people with disabilities: An exploratory study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(5), 571–591.
79.
PyerM.TuckerF. (2017). “With us, we, like, physically can’t”: Transport, mobility and the leisure experiences of teenage wheelchair users. Mobilities, 12(1), 36–52.
80.
QiaoG.HouS.ChenQ.XiangG.PrideauxB. (2024). Role of body in travel: Wheelchair users’ experience from a multi-sensory perspective. Journal of Travel Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875241249391
81.
QuinnT.BousquetF.GuerboisC.SougratiE.TabutaudM. (2018). The dynamic relationship between sense of place and risk perception in landscapes of mobility. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 39–52.
82.
RalphK.MorrisE. A.KwonJ. (2022). Disability, access to out-of-home activities, and subjective well-being. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 163, 209–227.
83.
RemillardE. T.CampbellM. L.KoonL. M.RogersW. A. (2022). Transportation challenges for persons aging with mobility disability: Qualitative insights and policy implications. Disability and Health Journal, 15(1), 101209.
84.
RhodenS.KaaristoM. (2020). Mobile landscapes and transport tourism: The visual experience of mobility during cruises and coach tours. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14(3), 307–319.
85.
SaltesN. (2018). Navigating disabling spaces: Challenging ontological norms and the spatialization of difference through “embodied practices of mobility”. Mobilities, 13(1), 81–95.
86.
SchatzkiT. R.Knorr-CetinaK.Von SavignyE. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
87.
SchewelK. (2020). Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. International Migration Review, 54(2), 328–355.
88.
SchützA.LuckmannT. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Vol. 1. Northwestern University Press.
89.
ScuttariA. (2021). Tourism experiences in motion. Mobile, visual and psychophysiological methods to capture tourists “on the move.”Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100825.
ShellerM. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. Verso Books.
92.
ShellerM.UrryJ. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
93.
ShiL.ColeS.ChancellorH. C. (2012). Understanding leisure travel motivations of travelers with acquired mobility impairments. Tourism Management, 33(1), 228–231.
94.
ShieldsR. (1999). Lefebvre, love, and struggle: Spatial dialectics. Routledge.
95.
SmallJ. (2015). Interconnecting mobilities on tour: Tourists with vision impairment partnered with sighted tourists. Tourism Geographies, 17(1), 76–90.
96.
SmallJ.DarcyS. (2010). Tourism, disability and mobility. In ColeS.MorganN. (Eds.), Tourism and inequality problems and prospects (pp. 1–20). CABI.
97.
SmallJ.DarcyS.PackerT. (2012). The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: Management implications beyond the visual gaze. Tourism Management, 33(4), 941–950.
98.
SongS.ParkK. (2023). Observing disability inclusion in service provision. Annals of Tourism Research, 100, 103551.
99.
StevensonN.AireyD.MillerG. (2008). Tourism policy making: The policymakers’ perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(3), 732–750.
100.
StockR. (2023). Broken elevators, temporalities of breakdown, and open data: How wheelchair mobility, social media activism and situated knowledge negotiate public transport systems. Mobilities, 18(1), 132–147.
101.
TaoC. B.DengB.SunJ. (2024). Memorable interactive experiences between hosts and guests in B&Bs and their generation process: The host perspective. Tourism Management, 102, 104861.
102.
TaoC. B.HuangS.WangJ.QiaoG. (2024). Accessible tourism: Tourists with physical disability—Segmentation based on perceived travel barriers. Tourism Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-07-2023-0459
103.
TuanY.-F. (1979). Space and place: Humanistic perspective. In GaleS.OlssonG. (Eds.), Philosophy in geography (pp. 387–427). Springer Netherlands.
104.
TutuncuO. (2017). Investigating the accessibility factors affecting hotel satisfaction of people with physical disabilities. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 65, 29–36.
105.
UrryJ. (2002). The tourist gaze. Sage.
106.
UrryJ. (2007). Mobilities. Polity.
107.
VilaT. D.DarcyS.GonzálezE. A. (2015). Competing for the disability tourism market—A comparative exploration of the factors of accessible tourism competitiveness in Spain and Australia. Tourism Management, 47, 261–272.
108.
WaittG.HaradaT. (2023). Towards a relational spatial mobility justice of disability as territory. Mobilities, 18(1), 115–131.
109.
WhalenE. A. (2018). Understanding a shifting methodology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3423–3441.
110.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245–271.
111.
YiL.TongY.WuM.-Y.FuX. (2023). Taking aging parents on holiday: A social practice perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 62(8), 1722–1736.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
