The online P2P accommodation market, including Airbnb, encourages accommodation hosts to upload profile photos. However, the inclusion of a profile photo may carry consequences such as appearance discrimination. Using secondary Airbnb data from Beijing, China, this study investigates the presence of the “beauty premium” in the relatively low-priced accommodation market and examines the extent to which consumers discriminate based on hosts’ facial appearance from a supply perspective. Three experiments were conducted to respectively examine the impacts of hosts’ facial beauty on customers’ willingness-to-pay, boundary conditions, and underlying mechanisms. The findings emphasize the importance of hosts’ visual self-disclosure in reducing appearance-based discrimination. By providing practical implications for P2P platform operators and accommodation hosts, this research contributes to a better understanding of appearance-based biases in the online accommodation market and reveals strategies for mitigating negative effects.
AmaldossW.ShinW. (2011). Competing for low-end markets. Marketing Science, 30(5), 776–788.
2.
AtkinsonA. C.RianiM.TortiF. (2016). Robust methods for heteroskedastic regression. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 104, 209–222.
3.
BanerjeeS.LensM.PalA. (2022). Put on your sunglasses and smile: The secret of Airbnb hosts’ profile photos?International Journal of Hospitality Management, 103, 103219.
4.
BarM.NetaM.LinzH. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6(2), 269–278.
5.
BarnesS. J. (2021). Understanding the overvaluation of facial trustworthiness in Airbnb host images. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102265.
6.
BarnesS. J.KirshnerS. N. (2021). Understanding the impact of host facial characteristics on Airbnb pricing: Integrating facial image analytics into tourism research. Tourism Management, 83, 104235.
7.
BazarovaN. N.ChoiY. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635–657.
8.
BergerC. R.CalabreseR. J. (1974). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.
9.
BertiniM.HalbheerD.KoenigsbergO. (2020). Price and quality decisions by self-serving managers. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(2), 236–257.
10.
BroederP.CrijnsK. (2019). Self-disclosure and trust on Airbnb: A cross-cultural perspective. In ZimandSheinerD.StrovskyD. (Eds.), Storytelling across platforms: Managing corporate and marketing communications from a storytelling perspective (pp. 160–171). Ariel University.
11.
CaoY.GuanF.LiZ.YangY. G. (2020). Analysts’ beauty and performance. Management Science, 66(9), 4315–4335.
12.
CarrE. W.BradyT. F.WinkielmanP. (2017). Are you smiling, or have I seen you before? Familiarity makes faces look happier. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1087–1102.
13.
Čekrlija RokvićN. MDinićB. MSchermerJ. A. (2023). Relationship between the inferiority and superiority complex and the big five and dark triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 206, 112123.
14.
ChattopadhyayM.MitraS. K. (2019). Do Airbnb host listing attributes influence room pricing homogenously?International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 54–64.
15.
CryderC.BottiS.SimonyanY. (2017). The charity beauty premium: Satisfying donors’ “want” versus “should” desires. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 605–618.
16.
DionK.BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.
17.
DolnicarS. (2019). A review of research into paid online peer-to-peer accommodation: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research curated collection on peer-to-peer accommodation. Annals of Tourism Research, 75, 248–264.
18.
EdelmanB.LucaM.SvirskyD. (2017). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 9(2), 1–22.
19.
EdelmanB. G.LucaM. (2014). Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper (14-054).
20.
ErtE.FleischerA. (2020). What do Airbnb hosts reveal by posting photographs online and how does it affect their perceived trustworthiness?. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 630–640.
21.
ErtE.FleischerA.MagenN. (2016). Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism Management, 55, 62–73.
22.
FagerstrømA.PawarS.SigurdssonV.FoxallG. R.Yani-de-SorianoM. (2017). That personal profile image might jeopardize your rental opportunity! On the relative impact of the seller’s facial expressions upon buying behavior on Airbnb™. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 123–131.
23.
FarmakiA.KladouS. (2020). Why do Airbnb hosts discriminate? Examining the sources and manifestations of discrimination in host practice. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 42, 181–189.
24.
GladstoneJ. J.GarbinskyE. N.MatzS. C. (2022). When does psychological fit matter? The moderating role of price on self-brand congruity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 595–607.
25.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Anchor Books.
26.
GuanS. S. A.SubrahmanyamK.LinaresK.ChengR. (2015). Beauty in the eye of the beholder? Attractiveness in a virtual world. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(2), article 2. doi: 10.5817/CP2015-2-2.
27.
HamermeshD. S.BiddleJ. E. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174–1194.
28.
HartmanR. S. (1989). Hedonic methods for evaluating product design and pricing strategies. Journal of Economics and Business, 41(3), 197–212.
29.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
30.
HillD. (2015). How much is your spare room worth?IEEE Spectrum, 52(9), 32–58.
31.
HongY.PavlouP. A. (2014). Product fit uncertainty in online markets: Nature, effects, and antecedents. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 328–344.
32.
HosodaM.Stone-RomeroE. F.CoatsG. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462.
33.
HuangM.WangW. (2019). Does mobile shopping make fast decisions? The role of contextual factors and thinking style. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(5), 612–624.
34.
JaegerB. (2020). Facial discrimination: The irresistible influence of first impressions. Proefschriftmaken.
35.
JaegerB.EvansA. M.StelM.van BeestI. (2019). Explaining the persistent influence of facial cues in social decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 148(6), 1008–1021.
36.
JaegerB.SleegersW. W. A.EvansA. M.StelM.van BeestI. (2019). The effects of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness in online peer-to-peer markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, 102125.
37.
JiangZ.XuJ.GorlinM.DharR. (2021). Beautiful and confident: How boosting self-perceived attractiveness reduces preference uncertainty in context-dependent choices. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 58, 908–924.
38.
JourardS. M. (1971). Self-disclosure. An experimental analysis of the transparent self. Wiley.
39.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
40.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press (Vol. 49 (49–81), pp. 74).
41.
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. E.Jr. (2016). Psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Routledge.
42.
LaFranceM.HechtM. A. (1995). Why smiles generate leniency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 207–214.
43.
LangloisJ. H.KalakanisL.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.
44.
LemayE. P.JrClarkM. S.GreenbergA. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 339–353.
45.
LiH.WangQ.LiG.CaiD. (2023). Do looks matter for hosts on the peer-to-peer sharing accommodation market?Annals of Tourism Research, 98, 103510.
46.
LiY.PengL.MaS.ZhouX. (2022). Beauty premium or beauty penalty in sharing accommodation situations based on lay theories. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(3), 929–950.
47.
LiY.ZhangC.LarocheM. (2019). Is beauty a premium? A study of the physical attractiveness effect in service encounters. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 215–225.
48.
LiangL.LinL.JinL.XieD.LiM. (2018, August). Scut–fbp5500: A diverse benchmark dataset for multi-paradigm facial beauty prediction [Conference session]. 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (pp.1598–1603). IEEE.
49.
LordeT.JacobJ.WeekesQ. (2019). Price-setting behavior in a tourism sharing economy accommodation market: A hedonic price analysis of AirBnB hosts in the caribbean. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 251–261.
50.
MarozzoV.RaimondoM. A.MiceliG.ScopellitiI. (2020). Effects of au naturel packaging colors on willingness to pay for healthy food. Psychology and Marketing, 37(7), 913–927.
51.
MaS.CuiX.XiaoX.ZhaoX. (2022). The impact of photo verification service on sales performance in the peer-to-peer economy: Moderating role of customer uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 142, 45–55.
52.
MaX.HancockJ. T.Lim MingjieK.NaamanM. (2017, February). Self-disclosure and perceived trustworthiness of Airbnb host profiles [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 2397–2409).
53.
MobiusM. M.RosenblatT. S. (2006). Why beauty matters. American Economic Review, 96(1), 222–235.
54.
ModyM. A.HanksL.ChengM. (2021). Sharing economy research in hospitality and tourism: A critical review using bibliometric analysis, content analysis and a quantitative systematic literature review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1711–1745.
55.
MosaadM.BenoitS.JayawardhenaC. (2023). The dark side of the sharing economy: A systematic literature review of externalities and their regulation. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114186.
56.
Nieto GarcíaM.Muñoz-GallegoP. A.VigliaG.González-Benito. (2020). Be social! The impact of self-presentation on peer-to-peer accommodation revenue. Journal of Travel Research, 59(7), 1268–1281.
57.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.
58.
OzanneM.LiuS. Q.MattilaA. S. (2019). Are attractive reviewers more persuasive? Examining the role of physical attractiveness in online reviews. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(6), 728–739.
59.
PengL.CuiG.ChungY.ZhengW. (2020). The Faces of success: Beauty and ugliness premiums in e-Commerce platforms. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 67–85.
60.
PennebakerJ. W.BoydR. L.JordanK.BlackburnK. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.
61.
PinoG.ZhangC. X.WangZ. (2020). (S)he’s so hearty”: Gender cues, stereotypes, and expectations of warmth in peer-to-peer accommodation services. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102650.
62.
RenJ.RaghupathiV.RaghupathiW. (2021). Effect of crowd wisdom on pricing in the asset-based sharing platform: An attribute substitution perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102874.
63.
RiesA.TroutJ. (2001). Positioning: The battle for your mind. McGraw Hill.
64.
RoethkeK.KlumpeJ.AdamM.BenlianA. (2020). Social influence tactics in e-commerce onboarding: The role of social proof and reciprocity in affecting user registrations. Decision Support Systems, 131, 113268.
65.
RosenS. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.
66.
SchamelG. (2012). Weekend vs. Midweek stays: Modelling hotel room rates in a small market. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1113–1118.
67.
SchwarzN.CloreG. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296–303.
68.
SimonH. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and organization, 1(1), 161–176.
69.
SolakiA.BertoF.SmetsS. (2021). The logic of fast and slow thinking. Erkenntnis, 86(3), 733–762.
70.
SuL.YangX.HuangY. (2022). How do tourism goal disclosure motivations drive Chinese tourists' goal-directed behaviors? The influences of feedback valence, affective rumination, and emotional engagement. Tourism Management, 90, 104483.
71.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.
72.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452–460.
73.
TidwellL. C.WaltherJ. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.
74.
TodorovA.SaidC. P.EngellA. D.OosterhofN. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460.
75.
TorkzadehG.DhillonG. (2002). Measuring factors that influence the success of Internet commerce. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 187–204.
76.
TussyadiahI. P. (2016). Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 70–80.
77.
TussyadiahI. P.PesonenJ. (2016). Impacts of peer-to-peer accommodation use on travel patterns. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 1022–1040.
78.
Van Der HeideB.D’AngeloJ. D.SchumakerE. M. (2012). The effects of verbal versus photographic self-presentation on impression formation in Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 98–116.
79.
Van KleefG. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188.
80.
VigliaG.DolnicarS. (2020). A review of experiments in tourism and hospitality. Annals of Tourism Research, 80, 102858.
81.
WaltherJ. B.ParksM. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In Handbook of interpersonal communication (MillerG. R., Ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage. (Vol. 3, pp. 529–563).
82.
WangD.NicolauJ. L. (2017). Price determinants of sharing economy based accommodation rental: A study of listings from 33 cities on airbnb.com. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 62, 120–131.
83.
WangX.JiangM.HanW.QiuL. (2022). Do emotions sell? The impact of emotional expressions on sales in the space–sharing economy. Production and Operations Management, 31(1), 65–82.
84.
WangX.SunJ.WenH. (2019). Tourism seasonality, online user rating and hotel price: A quantitative approach based on the hedonic price model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 79, 140–147.
85.
YangT.ZhaoX.WangX.LvH. (2020). Evaluating facial recognition web services with adversarial and synthetic samples. Neurocomputing, 406, 378–385.
86.
YanR.GongX. (2023). Mitigating property quality uncertainty and property fit uncertainty in online peer-to-peer accommodation platforms: An uncertainty reduction theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 302–320.
87.
ZhangL.XiongS.ZhangL.BaiL.YanQ. (2022). Reducing racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Empirical results from Airbnb. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103151.
88.
ZhangM.WangL.YangW.LiY.BaiY. (2021). Host facial features and Airbnb listing prices: a spatial hedonic pricing approach. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 38(9), 991–1003.
89.
ZhangS.FriedmanE.ZhangX.SrinivasanK.DharR. (2020). Serving with a smile on Airbnb: Analyzing the economic returns and behavioral underpinnings of the host’s smile. Available at SSRN 3692623.
90.
ZinkoR.StolkP.FurnerZ.AlmondB. (2020). A picture is worth a thousand words: how images influence information quality and information load in online reviews. Electronic Markets, 30, 775–789.
