Developing a Typology for Understanding Visiting Friends and Relatives Markets

Abstract

This study seeks to classify visiting friends and relatives (VFR) travel and to explore the linkage between VFR travel types and commercial tourism in an empirical study. The VFR phenomenon is multifaceted, making it hard to integrate research findings. This article proposes an initial typology of VFR travel and positions the major existing studies within this typology. Using data from Queensland, Australia, an examination is made of the relationships between the proposed variables and VFR travel and behavior patterns. The data set gave the researchers the ability to identify VFR as either a prime trip motive or one of a set of activities or regional attractions. The study provides an activities-based segmentation of this type of VFR traveler and attempts to connect different segments to both travel patterns and the variables in the proposed typology.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Braunlich, C. G. , and N. Nadkarni (1995). “The Importance of the VFR Market to the Hotel Industry.” Journal of Tourism Studies, 6 (1): 38-47.

Hay, B. (1996). “An Insight into the European Experience: A Case Study on Domestic VFR Tourism within the U.K.” InVFR Tourism: Issues and Implications, edited by H. R. Yaman . Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology, pp. 52-66.

Heath, E. , and G. Wall (1992).Marketing Tourism Destinations: A Strategic Planning Approach. New York: John Wiley.

Jackson, R. (1990). “VFR Tourism: Is It Underestimated?” Journal of Tourism Studies, 1 (2): 10-17.

King, B. (1996). “VFR: A Future Research Agenda.” InVFR Tourism: Issues and Implications, edited by H. R. Yaman . Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology, pp. 86-89.

Meis, S. , S. Joyal , and A. Trites (1995). “The U.S. Repeat and VFR Visitor to Canada.” Journal of Tourism Studies, 6 (1): 27-37.

Mill, R. C. , and A. M. Morrison (1998).The Tourism System: An Introductory Text. 3rd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

Morrison, A. M. , S. Hsieh , and J. T. O’Leary (1995). “Segmenting the Visiting Friends and Relatives Market by Holiday Activity Participation.” Journal of Tourism Studies, 6 (1): 48-63.

Morrison, A. M. , and J. T. O’Leary (1995). “The VFR Market: Desperately Seeking Respect.” Journal of Tourism Studies, 6 (1): 2-5.

10.

Paci, E. (1994). “Market Segments: The Major International VFR Markets.” EIU Travel and Tourism Analyst, 6: 36-50.

11.

Seaton, A. V. (1994). “Are Relatives Friends? Reassessing the VFR Category in Segmenting Tourism Markets.” InTourism: The State of the Art, edited by A. V. Seaton . Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 316-321.

12.

Seaton, A. V. (1996). “Making (Even More) Sense of the VFR Category in Tourism Analysis.” InVFR Tourism: Issues and Implications, edited by H. R. Yaman . Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology, pp. 27-51.

13.

Seaton, A. V. , and S. Tagg (1995). “Disaggregating Friends and Relatives in VFR Tourism Research.” Journal of Tourism Studies, 6 (1): 6-18.

14.

White, Chris (1996). “The VFR: The International Market Perspective.” In VFR Tourism: Issues and Implications, edited by H. R. Yaman . Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology, pp. 67-70.

15.

Yuan, T.-F. , J. D. Fridgen , S. Hsieh , and J. T. O’Leary (1995). “Visiting Friends and Relatives Travel Market: The Dutch Case.” Journal of Tourism Studies, 6 (1): 19-26.