The rise of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) threatens to upend traditional teaching and learning practices. Writing, speaking, and communication instruction will all need to evolve. This article presents a case study of one institution's efforts to design and implement a communication curriculum responsive to the unique demands of the EMI environment. The curriculum proposed enacts an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach to the teaching of communication. We discuss the specifics of the curriculum, the process of its creation, the principles underlying it, and how these principles play out in practice. In doing so, we hope to provide a model both for global communication instruction and future curricular design efforts.
Al-BatainehA.GallagherK. (2021). Attitudes towards translanguaging: How future teachers perceive the meshing of Arabic and English in children’s storybooks. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1471039
2.
BrunerJ. S. (1960). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press.
3.
CanagarajahS. (2018). Materializing ‘competence’: Perspectives from international STEM scholars. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12464
4.
DannelsD.Housley GaffneyA. (2009). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy. Communication Education, 58(1), 124–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802527288
5.
DeardenJ. (2018). The changing roles of EMI academics and English language specialists. In KırkgözY.DikilitaşK. (Eds.), Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 323–338). Springer.
6.
DressmanM. (2019). Multimodality and language learning. In DressmanM.SadlerR. (Eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 39–55). John Wiley & Sons.
7.
DressmanM. (2021). “After TESOL: Model of language education for an IDLE generation,” Keynote at International Association of Applied Linguistics World Congress.
8.
DusenberryL.HutterL.RobinsonJ. (2015). Filter. Remix. Make. Cultivating adaptability through multimodality. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(3), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615578851
9.
ElolaI.OskozA. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
10.
GonzalesL. (2020). Building transdisciplinary connections between composition studies and technical communication to understand multilingual writing processes. College English, 82(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce202030751
HodgesA.SeawrightL. (2019). Writing in transnational workplaces: Teaching strategies for multilingual engineers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2930178
13.
HopkynsS.ZoghborW.HassallP. J. (2021). The use of English and linguistic hybridity among Emirati millennials. World Englishes, 40(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12506
14.
JiangL. (2017). The affordances of digital multimodal composing for EFL learning. ELT Journal, 71(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw098
15.
KedrowiczA. A.TaylorJ. L. (2013). Engineering communication and the global workplace. ConneXions, International Professional Communication Journal, 1(2), 81–105.
KressG. (1999). English at the crossroads. In HawisherG.SelfeC. (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 66–88). Utah State UP.
MacaroE.CurleS.PunJ.AnJ.DeardenJ. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
21.
MartinK.GaffneyA. (2016). INSIGHT Telling and showing: The intersection of visual communication content knowledge and pedagogical strategies in STEM. Visual Communication Quarterly, 23(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2016.1178582
22.
NorthcutK. (2007). Introduction: Visual communication in life sciences. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(4), 375–378.
23.
ParkinsonJ. (2013). English For science and technology. In PalridgeB.StarfieldS. (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 155–173). Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
PecorariD.MalmströmH. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.470
25.
PlastinaA. (2013). Multimodality in English for specific purposes: Reconceptualizing meaning-making practices. LFE. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos.
26.
PriorP. (2013). Multimodality and ESP research. In PalridgeB.StarfieldS. (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 519–534). Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
SelfeC. (2009). The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing. College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 616–663.
28.
ShinD. S.CimaskoT.YiY. (eds) (2021). Multimodal composing in K-16 ESL and EFL education: multilingual perspectives. Springer Nature.
29.
SiemundP.Al-IssaA.LeimgruberJ. R. (2021). Multilingualism and the role of English in the United Arab Emirates. World Englishes, 40(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12507
TraceJ.HudsonT.BrownJ. D. (2015). An overview of language for specific purposes. In TraceJ.HudsonT.BrownJ. D. (Eds.), Developing courses in languages for specific purposes (pp. 1–23). National Foreign Language Resource Center.
