Cartographic Literacy can Support Social Change Approaches in Technical Communication Courses

Abstract

Instruction in cartographic or map literacy in technical communication courses can support pedagogies promoting social change. Students must develop an ability to read, understand, interpret, use, and critique maps in technical communication contexts. This article argues that attention to cartographic literacy can build on existing visual literacies to promote critical understanding of how to use and create maps that engage with issues related to social change. A description of a sample assignment is included to introduce cartographic literacy in undergraduate technical communication courses. Student map examples support the conclusion that students benefit from instruction in cartographic literacy and that cartographic literacy can be an important component of technical communication pedagogies that work toward social justice.

Keywords

visual literacy cartographic literacy pedagogy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Axon

Speake

Crawford

. (2012). ‘At the next junction, turn left’: Attitudes towards Sat nav use. Area, 44(2), 170–177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01086.x

Barton

B. F.

Barton

M. S.

(1993). Ideology and the map: Toward a postmodern visual design practice. In Blyler

N. R.

Thralls

(Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective. (pp. 49–78). Sage.

Begum

(2016). Mapping disease: John Snow and cholera. Royal College of Surgeons of England. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/library-and-publications/library/blog/mapping-disease-john-snow-and-cholera/

Black

(2000). Maps and politics. University of Chicago Press.

Brumberger

E. R

. (2007). Making the strange familiar: A pedagogical exploration of visual thinking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(4), 376–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907304021

Butts

Jones

. (2021). Deep mapping for environmental communication design. Communication Design Quarterly, 19(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3437000.3437001

Cargile Cook

. (2002). Layered literacies: A theoretical frame for technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1101_1

Clarke

. (2003). Are you functionally map literate? In Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference (ICC) Durban, South Africa (Vol. 10).

Craig

. (2020). (Dis)Placing White Supremacy at Auburn University. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/d815c5655b2a42f6bc3fb713ea5dbff4

10.

Dalton

C. M.

Thatcher

. (2019). Seeing by the Starbucks: The social context of mobile maps and users’ geographic knowledges. Cartographic Perspectives, (92), 2442. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP92.1447

11.

Dent

Torguson

Hodler

(2009). Cartography: Thematic map design (6th ed.). McGraw Hill.

12.

DeTora

(2021). Competing mentalities: Situating scientific content literacy within technical communication pedagogy. In Klein

. (Ed.), Effective teaching of technical communication: Theory, practice, and application (pp. 271–285). University Press of Colorado.

13.

Diehl

Grabill

J. T.

Hart-Davidson

Iyer

. (2008). Grassroots: Supporting the knowledge work of everyday life. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 413–434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572250802324937

14.

Duffelmeyer

B. B.

Ellertson

. (2005). Critical visual literacy: Multimodal communication across the curriculum. Across the Disciplines: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Learning, and Academic Writing, 2, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2006.3.2.02

15.

Eichberger

. (2019). Maps, silence, and standing rock: Seeking a visuality for the age of environmental crisis. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 7(1), 9–21 . https://doi.org/10.1145/3331558.3331560

16.

Elwood

. (2006). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10(5), 693–708 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x

17.

Fleming

Quill

. (2020). Visual literacy and maps: A librarian approach to combating the COVID-19 infodemic. Digital Culture and Education. https://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/reflections-on-covid19/visual-literacy-and-maps

18.

George

. (2002). From analysis to design: Visual communication in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 54 (1), 11–39 . https://doi.org/10.2307/1512100

19.

Gray

L. S

. (2020). Planned destruction: A brief history on land ownership, valuation and development in the City of Richmond and the maps used to destroy black communities. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/600d5cb0e0454b1a809da6d4f31db8ca

20.

Harley

J. B

. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 26(2), 1–20 . http://doi.org/10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53

21.

Harley

J. B

. (1991/2001). Can there be a cartographic ethics? In The new nature of maps: Essays in the history of cartography (pp. 198−207). Johns Hopkins University Press.

22.

Harley

J. B

. (1997/2001). Power and legitimation in the English geographical atlases of the eighteenth century. In The new nature of maps: Essays in the history of cartography (pp. 110–147). Johns Hopkins University Press.

23.

Henschel

Melonçon

. (2014). Of horsemen and layered literacies: Assessment instruments for aligning technical and professional communication undergraduate curricula with professional expectations. Programmatic Perspectives, 6(1), 3–26.

24.

Hurley

E. V.

(2018). Spatial orientations: Cultivating critical spatial perspectives in technical communication pedagogy. In Haas

. & Eble

. (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 93–113). Utah State University Press.

25.

Janks

. (2012). The importance of critical literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 150–163.

26.

Kimball

M. A

. (2006). London through rose-colored graphics: Visual rhetoric and information graphic design in Charles booth’s maps of London poverty. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36(4), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.2190/K561-40P2-5422-PTG2

27.

Lawrence

Hutter

(2021). Confronting methodological stasis: Re-examining approaches to technical communication pedagogical literacy frameworks. In Klein

. (Ed.), Effective teaching of technical communication: Theory, practice, and application (pp. 91–110). University Press of Colorado.

28.

Melonçon

. (2018). Critical postscript: On the future of the service course in technical and professional communication. Programmatic Perspectives, 10(1), 202–230.

29.

Moore

. (2013). Exposing hidden relations: Storytelling, pedagogy, and the study of policy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(1), 63–78. . https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.43.1.d

30.

Moriarty

Fox

. (2021). Play mini golf to see how politicians tilt elections using maps. Washington Post , https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2022/redistricting-mini-golf/

31.

Morrow

Mock

Papendieck

Kocmich

. (2011). Independent evaluation of the Ushahidi Haiti project. Development Information Systems International (pp. 1–36).

32.

Northcut

K. M

. (2007). The relevance of Feenberg’s critical theory of technology to critical visual literacy: The case of scientific and technical illustrations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.37.3.b

33.

Northcut

K. M.

Brumberger

E. R

. (2010). Resisting the lure of technology-driven design: Pedagogical approaches to visual communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40(4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.40.4.f

34.

Ooms

De Maeyer

Dupont

Van der Veken

Van de Weghe

Verplaetse

. (2016). Education in cartography: What is the status of young people’s map-reading skills? Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43(2), 134–153 . https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2015.1021713

35.

Phillips

N. C.

(2013). Investigating adolescents’ interpretations and productions of thematic maps and map argument performances in the media. [Doctoral Dissertation, Vanderbilt University].

36.

Portewig

T. C

. (2004). Making sense of the visual in technical communication: A visual literacy approach to pedagogy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.2190/FGJ6-UETB-9CA6-5PC3

37.

Princeton Gerrymandering Project. (2021). https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/about

38.

Propen

. (2007). Visual communication and the map: How maps as visual objects convey meaning in specific contexts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 233–254. http://doi.org/10.1080/10572250709336561

39.

Raynes

Heiser

. (2019). Cartographic literacy through object-based learning: The value of primary sources in instruction. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 15(2–3), 187–209. http://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2020.1739188

40.

Rude

C. D

. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 174–215. http://doi.org/10.1177/1050651908329562

41.

Santee

. (2022). Cartographic composition across the curriculum: Promoting cartographic literacy using maps as written texts. Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments, 6(2), 87-101. http://doi.org/10.31719/pjaw.v6i2.95

42.

Selfe

C.L.

(2004). Toward new media texts: Taking up the challenges of visual literacy. In Wysocki

A. F.

., Johnson-Eilola

., Selfe

C. L.

., & Sirc

(Eds.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 66–110). Utah State University Press.

43.

Speake

Axon

. (2012). “I never use ‘maps’ anymore”: Engaging with Sat Nav technologies and the implications for cartographic literacy and spatial awareness. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 326–336. http://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000021

44.

Stephens

S. H.

Richards

D. P

. (2020). Story mapping and sea level rise: Listening to global risks at street level. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 8(1), 5–18. http://doi.org/10.1145/3375134.3375135

45.

The New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In Cope

. & Kalantzis

. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

46.

Walton

Moore

Jones

(2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.

47.

Welhausen

C. A

. (2015). Power and authority in disease maps: Visualizing medical cartography through yellow fever mapping. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(3), 257–283. http://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915573942

48.

Welhausen

C. A

. (2017). At your own risk: User-contributed flu maps, participatory surveillance, and an emergent DIY risk assessment ethic. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(2), 51–61. http://doi.org/10.1145/3131201.3131206

49.

Wilber

. (2019) Planning and outlining your story map: How to set yourself up for success. ESRI ArcGIS Blog , https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-storymaps/sharing-collaboration/planning-and-outlining-your-story-map-how-to-set-yourself-up-for-success/

50.

Xie

Reader

Vacher

H. L.

(2021). Rethinking Map Literacy. Springer Nature.